What is the key to culturally competent care: Reducing bias or cultural tailoring?

Adolfo G. Cuevas, Kerth O’Brien, Somnath (Som) Saha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To gain a better understanding as to whether disparities in patient–provider relationships arise from ethnic minority patients being treated differently than European American patients while they would prefer to be treated the same, or whether disparities arise when ethnic minority patients are treated the same as European American patients while they would prefer to be treated differently. Method: African-American, Latina/Latino and European American community members were recruited to participate in one of 27 focus group discussions. Topics included what made a good or bad relationship with a doctor and what led one to trust a doctor. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results: Patients of all groups described experiences that reflected the concepts of patient-centred care, such as wanting a clinician who is attentive to patients’ needs. African-American patients reported experiences they viewed as discriminatory. Some African-American patients felt it was appropriate to racially/ethnically contextualise their care, and most Latina/Latino patients preferred language/culturally concordant clinicians. Conclusion: Health care disparities might be reduced through a patient-centred approach to cultural competency training, general knowledge of the cultural context of clinicians’ patient population, and attention to the effects of racial bias and discrimination among both clinicians and non-clinical staff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-507
Number of pages15
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2017

Fingerprint

Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Racism
Culturally Competent Care
Healthcare Disparities
Cultural Competency
Patient-Centered Care
European Union
Focus Groups
Language
Population

Keywords

  • clinician–patient relationships
  • cultural competency
  • ethnic minorities
  • focus groups
  • health care disparities
  • patient-centred care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

What is the key to culturally competent care : Reducing bias or cultural tailoring? / Cuevas, Adolfo G.; O’Brien, Kerth; Saha, Somnath (Som).

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 32, No. 4, 03.04.2017, p. 493-507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb7f33da4d5f4d5e93a4ab3d683a8221,
title = "What is the key to culturally competent care: Reducing bias or cultural tailoring?",
abstract = "Objective: To gain a better understanding as to whether disparities in patient–provider relationships arise from ethnic minority patients being treated differently than European American patients while they would prefer to be treated the same, or whether disparities arise when ethnic minority patients are treated the same as European American patients while they would prefer to be treated differently. Method: African-American, Latina/Latino and European American community members were recruited to participate in one of 27 focus group discussions. Topics included what made a good or bad relationship with a doctor and what led one to trust a doctor. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results: Patients of all groups described experiences that reflected the concepts of patient-centred care, such as wanting a clinician who is attentive to patients’ needs. African-American patients reported experiences they viewed as discriminatory. Some African-American patients felt it was appropriate to racially/ethnically contextualise their care, and most Latina/Latino patients preferred language/culturally concordant clinicians. Conclusion: Health care disparities might be reduced through a patient-centred approach to cultural competency training, general knowledge of the cultural context of clinicians’ patient population, and attention to the effects of racial bias and discrimination among both clinicians and non-clinical staff.",
keywords = "clinician–patient relationships, cultural competency, ethnic minorities, focus groups, health care disparities, patient-centred care",
author = "Cuevas, {Adolfo G.} and Kerth O’Brien and Saha, {Somnath (Som)}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2017.1284221",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "493--507",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the key to culturally competent care

T2 - Reducing bias or cultural tailoring?

AU - Cuevas, Adolfo G.

AU - O’Brien, Kerth

AU - Saha, Somnath (Som)

PY - 2017/4/3

Y1 - 2017/4/3

N2 - Objective: To gain a better understanding as to whether disparities in patient–provider relationships arise from ethnic minority patients being treated differently than European American patients while they would prefer to be treated the same, or whether disparities arise when ethnic minority patients are treated the same as European American patients while they would prefer to be treated differently. Method: African-American, Latina/Latino and European American community members were recruited to participate in one of 27 focus group discussions. Topics included what made a good or bad relationship with a doctor and what led one to trust a doctor. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results: Patients of all groups described experiences that reflected the concepts of patient-centred care, such as wanting a clinician who is attentive to patients’ needs. African-American patients reported experiences they viewed as discriminatory. Some African-American patients felt it was appropriate to racially/ethnically contextualise their care, and most Latina/Latino patients preferred language/culturally concordant clinicians. Conclusion: Health care disparities might be reduced through a patient-centred approach to cultural competency training, general knowledge of the cultural context of clinicians’ patient population, and attention to the effects of racial bias and discrimination among both clinicians and non-clinical staff.

AB - Objective: To gain a better understanding as to whether disparities in patient–provider relationships arise from ethnic minority patients being treated differently than European American patients while they would prefer to be treated the same, or whether disparities arise when ethnic minority patients are treated the same as European American patients while they would prefer to be treated differently. Method: African-American, Latina/Latino and European American community members were recruited to participate in one of 27 focus group discussions. Topics included what made a good or bad relationship with a doctor and what led one to trust a doctor. A thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results: Patients of all groups described experiences that reflected the concepts of patient-centred care, such as wanting a clinician who is attentive to patients’ needs. African-American patients reported experiences they viewed as discriminatory. Some African-American patients felt it was appropriate to racially/ethnically contextualise their care, and most Latina/Latino patients preferred language/culturally concordant clinicians. Conclusion: Health care disparities might be reduced through a patient-centred approach to cultural competency training, general knowledge of the cultural context of clinicians’ patient population, and attention to the effects of racial bias and discrimination among both clinicians and non-clinical staff.

KW - clinician–patient relationships

KW - cultural competency

KW - ethnic minorities

KW - focus groups

KW - health care disparities

KW - patient-centred care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011653984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011653984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2017.1284221

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2017.1284221

M3 - Article

C2 - 28165767

AN - SCOPUS:85011653984

VL - 32

SP - 493

EP - 507

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 4

ER -