"We've Learned It's a Medical Illness, Not a Moral Choice"

Qualitative Study of the Effects of a Multicomponent Addiction Intervention on Hospital Providers' Attitudes and Experiences

Honora Englander, Devin Collins, Sylvia Peterson Perry, Molly Rabinowitz, Elena Phoutrides, Christina Nicolaidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders (SUD) represent a national epidemic with increasing rates of SUD-related hospitalizations. However, most hospitals lack expertise or systems to directly address SUD. Healthcare professionals feel underprepared and commonly hold negative views toward patients with SUD. Little is known about how hospital interventions may affect providers' attitudes and experiences toward patients with SUD.

OBJECTIVE: To explore interprofessional hospital providers' perspectives on how integrating SUD treatment and care systems affect providers' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences.

DESIGN: In-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The study was part of a formative evaluation of the Improving Addiction Care Team (IMPACT), an interprofessional hospital-based addiction medicine service with rapid-access pathways to post-hospital SUD treatment.

SETTING: Single urban academic hospital in Portland, Oregon.

PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary hospital providers.

MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a thematic analysis using an inductive approach at a semantic level.

RESULTS: Before IMPACT, participants felt that hospitalization did not address addiction, leading to untreated withdrawal, patients leaving against medical advice, chaotic care, and staff "moral distress." Participants felt that IMPACT "completely reframes" addiction as a treatable chronic disease, improving patient engagement and communication, and humanizing care. Participants valued post-hospital SUD treatment pathways and felt having systems to address SUD reduced burnout and provided relief. Providers noted that IMPACT had limited ability to address poverty or engage highly ambivalent patients.

CONCLUSIONS: Providers' distress of caring for patients with SUD is not inevitable. Hospital-based SUD interventions can reframe providers' views of addiction and may have significant implications for clinical care and providers' well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)752-758
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hospital Medicine
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Hospitalization
Patient Participation
Aptitude
Urban Hospitals
Poverty
Focus Groups
Semantics
Chronic Disease
Therapeutics
Communication
Medicine
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Cite this

"We've Learned It's a Medical Illness, Not a Moral Choice" : Qualitative Study of the Effects of a Multicomponent Addiction Intervention on Hospital Providers' Attitudes and Experiences. / Englander, Honora; Collins, Devin; Perry, Sylvia Peterson; Rabinowitz, Molly; Phoutrides, Elena; Nicolaidis, Christina.

In: Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 752-758.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Englander, Honora ; Collins, Devin ; Perry, Sylvia Peterson ; Rabinowitz, Molly ; Phoutrides, Elena ; Nicolaidis, Christina. / "We've Learned It's a Medical Illness, Not a Moral Choice" : Qualitative Study of the Effects of a Multicomponent Addiction Intervention on Hospital Providers' Attitudes and Experiences. In: Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 13, No. 11. pp. 752-758.
@article{f814822972ee46139036efd2ed4b5762,
title = "{"}We've Learned It's a Medical Illness, Not a Moral Choice{"}: Qualitative Study of the Effects of a Multicomponent Addiction Intervention on Hospital Providers' Attitudes and Experiences",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders (SUD) represent a national epidemic with increasing rates of SUD-related hospitalizations. However, most hospitals lack expertise or systems to directly address SUD. Healthcare professionals feel underprepared and commonly hold negative views toward patients with SUD. Little is known about how hospital interventions may affect providers' attitudes and experiences toward patients with SUD.OBJECTIVE: To explore interprofessional hospital providers' perspectives on how integrating SUD treatment and care systems affect providers' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences.DESIGN: In-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The study was part of a formative evaluation of the Improving Addiction Care Team (IMPACT), an interprofessional hospital-based addiction medicine service with rapid-access pathways to post-hospital SUD treatment.SETTING: Single urban academic hospital in Portland, Oregon.PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary hospital providers.MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a thematic analysis using an inductive approach at a semantic level.RESULTS: Before IMPACT, participants felt that hospitalization did not address addiction, leading to untreated withdrawal, patients leaving against medical advice, chaotic care, and staff {"}moral distress.{"} Participants felt that IMPACT {"}completely reframes{"} addiction as a treatable chronic disease, improving patient engagement and communication, and humanizing care. Participants valued post-hospital SUD treatment pathways and felt having systems to address SUD reduced burnout and provided relief. Providers noted that IMPACT had limited ability to address poverty or engage highly ambivalent patients.CONCLUSIONS: Providers' distress of caring for patients with SUD is not inevitable. Hospital-based SUD interventions can reframe providers' views of addiction and may have significant implications for clinical care and providers' well-being.",
author = "Honora Englander and Devin Collins and Perry, {Sylvia Peterson} and Molly Rabinowitz and Elena Phoutrides and Christina Nicolaidis",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12788/jhm.2993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "752--758",
journal = "Journal of hospital medicine (Online)",
issn = "1553-5606",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "We've Learned It's a Medical Illness, Not a Moral Choice"

T2 - Qualitative Study of the Effects of a Multicomponent Addiction Intervention on Hospital Providers' Attitudes and Experiences

AU - Englander, Honora

AU - Collins, Devin

AU - Perry, Sylvia Peterson

AU - Rabinowitz, Molly

AU - Phoutrides, Elena

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders (SUD) represent a national epidemic with increasing rates of SUD-related hospitalizations. However, most hospitals lack expertise or systems to directly address SUD. Healthcare professionals feel underprepared and commonly hold negative views toward patients with SUD. Little is known about how hospital interventions may affect providers' attitudes and experiences toward patients with SUD.OBJECTIVE: To explore interprofessional hospital providers' perspectives on how integrating SUD treatment and care systems affect providers' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences.DESIGN: In-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The study was part of a formative evaluation of the Improving Addiction Care Team (IMPACT), an interprofessional hospital-based addiction medicine service with rapid-access pathways to post-hospital SUD treatment.SETTING: Single urban academic hospital in Portland, Oregon.PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary hospital providers.MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a thematic analysis using an inductive approach at a semantic level.RESULTS: Before IMPACT, participants felt that hospitalization did not address addiction, leading to untreated withdrawal, patients leaving against medical advice, chaotic care, and staff "moral distress." Participants felt that IMPACT "completely reframes" addiction as a treatable chronic disease, improving patient engagement and communication, and humanizing care. Participants valued post-hospital SUD treatment pathways and felt having systems to address SUD reduced burnout and provided relief. Providers noted that IMPACT had limited ability to address poverty or engage highly ambivalent patients.CONCLUSIONS: Providers' distress of caring for patients with SUD is not inevitable. Hospital-based SUD interventions can reframe providers' views of addiction and may have significant implications for clinical care and providers' well-being.

AB - BACKGROUND: Substance use disorders (SUD) represent a national epidemic with increasing rates of SUD-related hospitalizations. However, most hospitals lack expertise or systems to directly address SUD. Healthcare professionals feel underprepared and commonly hold negative views toward patients with SUD. Little is known about how hospital interventions may affect providers' attitudes and experiences toward patients with SUD.OBJECTIVE: To explore interprofessional hospital providers' perspectives on how integrating SUD treatment and care systems affect providers' attitudes, beliefs, and experiences.DESIGN: In-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The study was part of a formative evaluation of the Improving Addiction Care Team (IMPACT), an interprofessional hospital-based addiction medicine service with rapid-access pathways to post-hospital SUD treatment.SETTING: Single urban academic hospital in Portland, Oregon.PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary hospital providers.MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a thematic analysis using an inductive approach at a semantic level.RESULTS: Before IMPACT, participants felt that hospitalization did not address addiction, leading to untreated withdrawal, patients leaving against medical advice, chaotic care, and staff "moral distress." Participants felt that IMPACT "completely reframes" addiction as a treatable chronic disease, improving patient engagement and communication, and humanizing care. Participants valued post-hospital SUD treatment pathways and felt having systems to address SUD reduced burnout and provided relief. Providers noted that IMPACT had limited ability to address poverty or engage highly ambivalent patients.CONCLUSIONS: Providers' distress of caring for patients with SUD is not inevitable. Hospital-based SUD interventions can reframe providers' views of addiction and may have significant implications for clinical care and providers' well-being.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055832346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055832346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12788/jhm.2993

DO - 10.12788/jhm.2993

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 752

EP - 758

JO - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

JF - Journal of hospital medicine (Online)

SN - 1553-5606

IS - 11

ER -