Voluntary refusal of food and fluids: attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.

Theresa A. Harvath, Lois L. Miller, Elizabeth Goy, Ann Jackson, Molly Delorit, Linda Ganzini

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Scopus citations


    As the ethical debate about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) continues, one alternative that has been suggested is for the patient to voluntarily refuse all food and fluids (VRFF). The article describes the results of a study of hospice nurses' and social workers' attitudes towards VRFF and compares them with their attitudes towards PAS. In 2001, a questionnaire was posted to nurses and social workers who care for Oregon residents enrolled in hospice programmes to determine their attitudes towards PAS and VRFF. In general, hospice workers expressed support for patients who choose to hasten their death by VRFF; they were less supportive of PAS. The results from this study suggest that perceptions regarding VRFF are significantly different from those regarding PAS. These results may have important clinical implications for nurses and social workers involved in end-of-life care who encounter patients who wish to hasten their deaths.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)236-241; discussion 242-243
    JournalInternational journal of palliative nursing
    Issue number5
    StatePublished - May 2004

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Advanced and Specialized Nursing


    Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary refusal of food and fluids: attitudes of Oregon hospice nurses and social workers.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this