Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain

Karleen Giannitrapani, Matthew McCaa, Marie Haverfield, Robert D. Kerns, Christine Timko, Steven Dobscha, Karl Lorenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Pain is a longstanding and growing concern among US military veterans. Although many individuals rely on medications, a growing body of literature supports the use of complementary non-pharmacologic approaches when treating pain. Our objective is to characterize veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing alternatives to medication (e.g., non-pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic approaches) for pain in primary care. Materials and Methods: Data for this qualitative analysis were collected as part of the Effective Screening for Pain (ESP) study (2012-2017), a national randomized controlled trial of pain screening and assessment methods. This study was approved by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central IRB and veteran participants signed written informed consent. We recruited a convenience sample of US military veterans in four primary care clinics and conducted semi-structured interviews (25-65 min) elucidating veteran experiences with assessment and management of pain in VA Healthcare Systems. We completed interviews with 36 veterans, including 7 females and 29 males, from three VA health care systems. They ranged in age from 28 to 94 yr and had pain intensity ratings ranging from 0 to 9 on the "pain now" numeric rating scale at the time of the interviews. We analyzed interview transcripts using constant comparison and produced mutually agreed upon themes. Results: Veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing complementary non-pharmacologic approaches for pain clustered into five main themes: communication with provider about complementary approaches ("one of the best things the VA has ever given me was pain education and it was through my occupational therapist"), care coordination ("I have friends that go to small clinic in [area A] and I still see them down in [facility in area B] and they're going through headaches upon headaches in trying to get their information to their primary care docs"), veteran expectations about pain experience ("I think as a society we have shifted the focus to if this doctor doesn't relieve me of my pain I will find someone who does"), veteran knowledge and beliefs about various complementary non-pharmacologic approaches ("how many people know that tai chi will help with pain?… Probably none. I saw them doing tai chi down here at the VA clinic and the only reason I knew about it was because I saw it being done"), and access ("the only physical therapy I ever did… it helped…but it was a two-and-a-half-hour drive to get there three times a week… I can't do this"). Specific access barriers included local availability, time, distance, scheduling flexibility, enrollment, and reimbursement. Conclusion: The veterans in this qualitative study expressed interest in using non-pharmacologic approaches to manage pain, but voiced complex multi-level barriers. Limitations of our study include that interviews were conducted only in five clinics and with seven female veterans. These limitations are minimized in that the clinics covered are diverse ranging to include urban, suburban, and rural residents. Future implementation efforts can learn from the veterans' voice to appropriately target veteran concerns and achieve more patient-centered pain care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e628-e634
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume183
Issue number11-12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Veterans
Pain
Interviews
Tai Ji
Primary Health Care
Pain Measurement
Headache
Veterans Health
Delivery of Health Care
Patient-Centered Care
Research Ethics Committees
Pain Management
Informed Consent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Giannitrapani, K., McCaa, M., Haverfield, M., Kerns, R. D., Timko, C., Dobscha, S., & Lorenz, K. (2018). Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain. Military Medicine, 183(11-12), e628-e634. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy018

Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain. / Giannitrapani, Karleen; McCaa, Matthew; Haverfield, Marie; Kerns, Robert D.; Timko, Christine; Dobscha, Steven; Lorenz, Karl.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 183, No. 11-12, 01.11.2018, p. e628-e634.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giannitrapani, K, McCaa, M, Haverfield, M, Kerns, RD, Timko, C, Dobscha, S & Lorenz, K 2018, 'Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain', Military Medicine, vol. 183, no. 11-12, pp. e628-e634. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy018
Giannitrapani K, McCaa M, Haverfield M, Kerns RD, Timko C, Dobscha S et al. Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain. Military Medicine. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e628-e634. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy018
Giannitrapani, Karleen ; McCaa, Matthew ; Haverfield, Marie ; Kerns, Robert D. ; Timko, Christine ; Dobscha, Steven ; Lorenz, Karl. / Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain. In: Military Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 183, No. 11-12. pp. e628-e634.
@article{1c31f8b307f24a60a25e98647b6525d7,
title = "Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain",
abstract = "Introduction: Pain is a longstanding and growing concern among US military veterans. Although many individuals rely on medications, a growing body of literature supports the use of complementary non-pharmacologic approaches when treating pain. Our objective is to characterize veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing alternatives to medication (e.g., non-pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic approaches) for pain in primary care. Materials and Methods: Data for this qualitative analysis were collected as part of the Effective Screening for Pain (ESP) study (2012-2017), a national randomized controlled trial of pain screening and assessment methods. This study was approved by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central IRB and veteran participants signed written informed consent. We recruited a convenience sample of US military veterans in four primary care clinics and conducted semi-structured interviews (25-65 min) elucidating veteran experiences with assessment and management of pain in VA Healthcare Systems. We completed interviews with 36 veterans, including 7 females and 29 males, from three VA health care systems. They ranged in age from 28 to 94 yr and had pain intensity ratings ranging from 0 to 9 on the {"}pain now{"} numeric rating scale at the time of the interviews. We analyzed interview transcripts using constant comparison and produced mutually agreed upon themes. Results: Veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing complementary non-pharmacologic approaches for pain clustered into five main themes: communication with provider about complementary approaches ({"}one of the best things the VA has ever given me was pain education and it was through my occupational therapist{"}), care coordination ({"}I have friends that go to small clinic in [area A] and I still see them down in [facility in area B] and they're going through headaches upon headaches in trying to get their information to their primary care docs{"}), veteran expectations about pain experience ({"}I think as a society we have shifted the focus to if this doctor doesn't relieve me of my pain I will find someone who does{"}), veteran knowledge and beliefs about various complementary non-pharmacologic approaches ({"}how many people know that tai chi will help with pain?… Probably none. I saw them doing tai chi down here at the VA clinic and the only reason I knew about it was because I saw it being done{"}), and access ({"}the only physical therapy I ever did… it helped…but it was a two-and-a-half-hour drive to get there three times a week… I can't do this{"}). Specific access barriers included local availability, time, distance, scheduling flexibility, enrollment, and reimbursement. Conclusion: The veterans in this qualitative study expressed interest in using non-pharmacologic approaches to manage pain, but voiced complex multi-level barriers. Limitations of our study include that interviews were conducted only in five clinics and with seven female veterans. These limitations are minimized in that the clinics covered are diverse ranging to include urban, suburban, and rural residents. Future implementation efforts can learn from the veterans' voice to appropriately target veteran concerns and achieve more patient-centered pain care.",
author = "Karleen Giannitrapani and Matthew McCaa and Marie Haverfield and Kerns, {Robert D.} and Christine Timko and Steven Dobscha and Karl Lorenz",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/milmed/usy018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "e628--e634",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",
number = "11-12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Veteran Experiences Seeking Non-pharmacologic Approaches for Pain

AU - Giannitrapani, Karleen

AU - McCaa, Matthew

AU - Haverfield, Marie

AU - Kerns, Robert D.

AU - Timko, Christine

AU - Dobscha, Steven

AU - Lorenz, Karl

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Introduction: Pain is a longstanding and growing concern among US military veterans. Although many individuals rely on medications, a growing body of literature supports the use of complementary non-pharmacologic approaches when treating pain. Our objective is to characterize veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing alternatives to medication (e.g., non-pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic approaches) for pain in primary care. Materials and Methods: Data for this qualitative analysis were collected as part of the Effective Screening for Pain (ESP) study (2012-2017), a national randomized controlled trial of pain screening and assessment methods. This study was approved by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central IRB and veteran participants signed written informed consent. We recruited a convenience sample of US military veterans in four primary care clinics and conducted semi-structured interviews (25-65 min) elucidating veteran experiences with assessment and management of pain in VA Healthcare Systems. We completed interviews with 36 veterans, including 7 females and 29 males, from three VA health care systems. They ranged in age from 28 to 94 yr and had pain intensity ratings ranging from 0 to 9 on the "pain now" numeric rating scale at the time of the interviews. We analyzed interview transcripts using constant comparison and produced mutually agreed upon themes. Results: Veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing complementary non-pharmacologic approaches for pain clustered into five main themes: communication with provider about complementary approaches ("one of the best things the VA has ever given me was pain education and it was through my occupational therapist"), care coordination ("I have friends that go to small clinic in [area A] and I still see them down in [facility in area B] and they're going through headaches upon headaches in trying to get their information to their primary care docs"), veteran expectations about pain experience ("I think as a society we have shifted the focus to if this doctor doesn't relieve me of my pain I will find someone who does"), veteran knowledge and beliefs about various complementary non-pharmacologic approaches ("how many people know that tai chi will help with pain?… Probably none. I saw them doing tai chi down here at the VA clinic and the only reason I knew about it was because I saw it being done"), and access ("the only physical therapy I ever did… it helped…but it was a two-and-a-half-hour drive to get there three times a week… I can't do this"). Specific access barriers included local availability, time, distance, scheduling flexibility, enrollment, and reimbursement. Conclusion: The veterans in this qualitative study expressed interest in using non-pharmacologic approaches to manage pain, but voiced complex multi-level barriers. Limitations of our study include that interviews were conducted only in five clinics and with seven female veterans. These limitations are minimized in that the clinics covered are diverse ranging to include urban, suburban, and rural residents. Future implementation efforts can learn from the veterans' voice to appropriately target veteran concerns and achieve more patient-centered pain care.

AB - Introduction: Pain is a longstanding and growing concern among US military veterans. Although many individuals rely on medications, a growing body of literature supports the use of complementary non-pharmacologic approaches when treating pain. Our objective is to characterize veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing alternatives to medication (e.g., non-pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic approaches) for pain in primary care. Materials and Methods: Data for this qualitative analysis were collected as part of the Effective Screening for Pain (ESP) study (2012-2017), a national randomized controlled trial of pain screening and assessment methods. This study was approved by the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central IRB and veteran participants signed written informed consent. We recruited a convenience sample of US military veterans in four primary care clinics and conducted semi-structured interviews (25-65 min) elucidating veteran experiences with assessment and management of pain in VA Healthcare Systems. We completed interviews with 36 veterans, including 7 females and 29 males, from three VA health care systems. They ranged in age from 28 to 94 yr and had pain intensity ratings ranging from 0 to 9 on the "pain now" numeric rating scale at the time of the interviews. We analyzed interview transcripts using constant comparison and produced mutually agreed upon themes. Results: Veteran experiences with and barriers to accessing complementary non-pharmacologic approaches for pain clustered into five main themes: communication with provider about complementary approaches ("one of the best things the VA has ever given me was pain education and it was through my occupational therapist"), care coordination ("I have friends that go to small clinic in [area A] and I still see them down in [facility in area B] and they're going through headaches upon headaches in trying to get their information to their primary care docs"), veteran expectations about pain experience ("I think as a society we have shifted the focus to if this doctor doesn't relieve me of my pain I will find someone who does"), veteran knowledge and beliefs about various complementary non-pharmacologic approaches ("how many people know that tai chi will help with pain?… Probably none. I saw them doing tai chi down here at the VA clinic and the only reason I knew about it was because I saw it being done"), and access ("the only physical therapy I ever did… it helped…but it was a two-and-a-half-hour drive to get there three times a week… I can't do this"). Specific access barriers included local availability, time, distance, scheduling flexibility, enrollment, and reimbursement. Conclusion: The veterans in this qualitative study expressed interest in using non-pharmacologic approaches to manage pain, but voiced complex multi-level barriers. Limitations of our study include that interviews were conducted only in five clinics and with seven female veterans. These limitations are minimized in that the clinics covered are diverse ranging to include urban, suburban, and rural residents. Future implementation efforts can learn from the veterans' voice to appropriately target veteran concerns and achieve more patient-centered pain care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057525025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057525025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/milmed/usy018

DO - 10.1093/milmed/usy018

M3 - Article

C2 - 29590422

AN - SCOPUS:85057525025

VL - 183

SP - e628-e634

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

IS - 11-12

ER -