Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures

Joel H. Hillelsohn, Brian Duty, Michael L. Blute, Zhamshid Okhunov, Mahyar Kashan, Robert Moldwin, Richard N. Ashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the variability of pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among American urologists. Materials and methods: A survey was electronically mailed to 3355 urologists around the country. Urologists were surveyed on their antibiotic prophylaxis choice, the route and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Additionally they were questioned about their knowledge of local antimicrobial resistance and if rectal enemas were routinely used. Results: There were 679 (21%) responses to the survey. The survey revealed differences in pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among urologists. Ten different classes of antibiotics were used orally, 4 classes intramuscular, 5 classes intravenous, and there was also 14 different duration regimens. Conclusion: Despite the initiation of the 2008 American Urological Association Guidelines on this topic, there still is a lack of uniformity in prostate biopsy prophylaxis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6573-6577
Number of pages5
JournalCanadian Journal of Urology
Volume19
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Prostate
Biopsy
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Enema
Guidelines
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Urologists
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Biopsy
  • Infection
  • Prophylaxis
  • Prostate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Hillelsohn, J. H., Duty, B., Blute, M. L., Okhunov, Z., Kashan, M., Moldwin, R., & Ashley, R. N. (2012). Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures. Canadian Journal of Urology, 19(6), 6573-6577.

Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures. / Hillelsohn, Joel H.; Duty, Brian; Blute, Michael L.; Okhunov, Zhamshid; Kashan, Mahyar; Moldwin, Robert; Ashley, Richard N.

In: Canadian Journal of Urology, Vol. 19, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 6573-6577.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hillelsohn, JH, Duty, B, Blute, ML, Okhunov, Z, Kashan, M, Moldwin, R & Ashley, RN 2012, 'Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures', Canadian Journal of Urology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 6573-6577.
Hillelsohn JH, Duty B, Blute ML, Okhunov Z, Kashan M, Moldwin R et al. Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures. Canadian Journal of Urology. 2012 Dec;19(6):6573-6577.
Hillelsohn, Joel H. ; Duty, Brian ; Blute, Michael L. ; Okhunov, Zhamshid ; Kashan, Mahyar ; Moldwin, Robert ; Ashley, Richard N. / Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures. In: Canadian Journal of Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 6573-6577.
@article{a58d6a10ce2540149a5ae4052642662a,
title = "Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures",
abstract = "Introduction: To assess the variability of pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among American urologists. Materials and methods: A survey was electronically mailed to 3355 urologists around the country. Urologists were surveyed on their antibiotic prophylaxis choice, the route and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Additionally they were questioned about their knowledge of local antimicrobial resistance and if rectal enemas were routinely used. Results: There were 679 (21{\%}) responses to the survey. The survey revealed differences in pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among urologists. Ten different classes of antibiotics were used orally, 4 classes intramuscular, 5 classes intravenous, and there was also 14 different duration regimens. Conclusion: Despite the initiation of the 2008 American Urological Association Guidelines on this topic, there still is a lack of uniformity in prostate biopsy prophylaxis.",
keywords = "Biopsy, Infection, Prophylaxis, Prostate",
author = "Hillelsohn, {Joel H.} and Brian Duty and Blute, {Michael L.} and Zhamshid Okhunov and Mahyar Kashan and Robert Moldwin and Ashley, {Richard N.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "6573--6577",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
issn = "1195-9479",
publisher = "Canadian Journal of Urology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy prophylactic measures

AU - Hillelsohn, Joel H.

AU - Duty, Brian

AU - Blute, Michael L.

AU - Okhunov, Zhamshid

AU - Kashan, Mahyar

AU - Moldwin, Robert

AU - Ashley, Richard N.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Introduction: To assess the variability of pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among American urologists. Materials and methods: A survey was electronically mailed to 3355 urologists around the country. Urologists were surveyed on their antibiotic prophylaxis choice, the route and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Additionally they were questioned about their knowledge of local antimicrobial resistance and if rectal enemas were routinely used. Results: There were 679 (21%) responses to the survey. The survey revealed differences in pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among urologists. Ten different classes of antibiotics were used orally, 4 classes intramuscular, 5 classes intravenous, and there was also 14 different duration regimens. Conclusion: Despite the initiation of the 2008 American Urological Association Guidelines on this topic, there still is a lack of uniformity in prostate biopsy prophylaxis.

AB - Introduction: To assess the variability of pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among American urologists. Materials and methods: A survey was electronically mailed to 3355 urologists around the country. Urologists were surveyed on their antibiotic prophylaxis choice, the route and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Additionally they were questioned about their knowledge of local antimicrobial resistance and if rectal enemas were routinely used. Results: There were 679 (21%) responses to the survey. The survey revealed differences in pre-prostate biopsy prophylaxis among urologists. Ten different classes of antibiotics were used orally, 4 classes intramuscular, 5 classes intravenous, and there was also 14 different duration regimens. Conclusion: Despite the initiation of the 2008 American Urological Association Guidelines on this topic, there still is a lack of uniformity in prostate biopsy prophylaxis.

KW - Biopsy

KW - Infection

KW - Prophylaxis

KW - Prostate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878466645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878466645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23228295

AN - SCOPUS:84878466645

VL - 19

SP - 6573

EP - 6577

JO - Canadian Journal of Urology

JF - Canadian Journal of Urology

SN - 1195-9479

IS - 6

ER -