Variability of Capillary Refill Time among Physician Measurements

David C. Sheridan, Steven D. Baker, Susan A. Kayser, David Jones, Matthew Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The assessment of capillary refill time (CRT) is a common physical examination technique. However, despite its importance and its widespread use, there is little standardization, which can lead to inaccurate assessments. Objective: In this article, we assessed how different physicians estimate CRT. We hypothesized that when different physicians are presented with the same recordings of CRT, clinicians will, on average, provide different CRT estimates. Methods: Using recordings of different fingertip compressions, physicians assessed and documented when capillary refill had returned to normal. Videos were recorded of the fingertips only, with no other identifying markers or subject characteristics provided. Videos were shown at one-quarter speed to allow time for recognition and response to the capillary refill. The primary outcome was physician estimates of CRT for each video recording. Results: An analysis of variance regression revealed significant differences in physician estimates of CRT when examining the same CRT videos from 34 subjects. Further regression analyses reveal the importance of controlling for the physician that is examining the patient when predicting a patient's CRT. Conclusions: Results indicate that some physicians gave, on average, slower CRT estimates, whereas others gave, on average, faster CRT estimates. Objective approaches and innovations in assessment of capillary refill have the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of this important clinical examination finding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Physicians
Video Recording
Physical Examination
Analysis of Variance
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Capillary refill
  • Dehydration
  • Perfusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Variability of Capillary Refill Time among Physician Measurements. / Sheridan, David C.; Baker, Steven D.; Kayser, Susan A.; Jones, David; Hansen, Matthew.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sheridan, David C. ; Baker, Steven D. ; Kayser, Susan A. ; Jones, David ; Hansen, Matthew. / Variability of Capillary Refill Time among Physician Measurements. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017.
@article{d133fb95b6454a96a55d25e7f72c1240,
title = "Variability of Capillary Refill Time among Physician Measurements",
abstract = "Background: The assessment of capillary refill time (CRT) is a common physical examination technique. However, despite its importance and its widespread use, there is little standardization, which can lead to inaccurate assessments. Objective: In this article, we assessed how different physicians estimate CRT. We hypothesized that when different physicians are presented with the same recordings of CRT, clinicians will, on average, provide different CRT estimates. Methods: Using recordings of different fingertip compressions, physicians assessed and documented when capillary refill had returned to normal. Videos were recorded of the fingertips only, with no other identifying markers or subject characteristics provided. Videos were shown at one-quarter speed to allow time for recognition and response to the capillary refill. The primary outcome was physician estimates of CRT for each video recording. Results: An analysis of variance regression revealed significant differences in physician estimates of CRT when examining the same CRT videos from 34 subjects. Further regression analyses reveal the importance of controlling for the physician that is examining the patient when predicting a patient's CRT. Conclusions: Results indicate that some physicians gave, on average, slower CRT estimates, whereas others gave, on average, faster CRT estimates. Objective approaches and innovations in assessment of capillary refill have the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of this important clinical examination finding.",
keywords = "Capillary refill, Dehydration, Perfusion",
author = "Sheridan, {David C.} and Baker, {Steven D.} and Kayser, {Susan A.} and David Jones and Matthew Hansen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.035",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of Capillary Refill Time among Physician Measurements

AU - Sheridan, David C.

AU - Baker, Steven D.

AU - Kayser, Susan A.

AU - Jones, David

AU - Hansen, Matthew

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: The assessment of capillary refill time (CRT) is a common physical examination technique. However, despite its importance and its widespread use, there is little standardization, which can lead to inaccurate assessments. Objective: In this article, we assessed how different physicians estimate CRT. We hypothesized that when different physicians are presented with the same recordings of CRT, clinicians will, on average, provide different CRT estimates. Methods: Using recordings of different fingertip compressions, physicians assessed and documented when capillary refill had returned to normal. Videos were recorded of the fingertips only, with no other identifying markers or subject characteristics provided. Videos were shown at one-quarter speed to allow time for recognition and response to the capillary refill. The primary outcome was physician estimates of CRT for each video recording. Results: An analysis of variance regression revealed significant differences in physician estimates of CRT when examining the same CRT videos from 34 subjects. Further regression analyses reveal the importance of controlling for the physician that is examining the patient when predicting a patient's CRT. Conclusions: Results indicate that some physicians gave, on average, slower CRT estimates, whereas others gave, on average, faster CRT estimates. Objective approaches and innovations in assessment of capillary refill have the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of this important clinical examination finding.

AB - Background: The assessment of capillary refill time (CRT) is a common physical examination technique. However, despite its importance and its widespread use, there is little standardization, which can lead to inaccurate assessments. Objective: In this article, we assessed how different physicians estimate CRT. We hypothesized that when different physicians are presented with the same recordings of CRT, clinicians will, on average, provide different CRT estimates. Methods: Using recordings of different fingertip compressions, physicians assessed and documented when capillary refill had returned to normal. Videos were recorded of the fingertips only, with no other identifying markers or subject characteristics provided. Videos were shown at one-quarter speed to allow time for recognition and response to the capillary refill. The primary outcome was physician estimates of CRT for each video recording. Results: An analysis of variance regression revealed significant differences in physician estimates of CRT when examining the same CRT videos from 34 subjects. Further regression analyses reveal the importance of controlling for the physician that is examining the patient when predicting a patient's CRT. Conclusions: Results indicate that some physicians gave, on average, slower CRT estimates, whereas others gave, on average, faster CRT estimates. Objective approaches and innovations in assessment of capillary refill have the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of this important clinical examination finding.

KW - Capillary refill

KW - Dehydration

KW - Perfusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029578278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029578278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 28941555

AN - SCOPUS:85029578278

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

ER -