Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients

Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves, Ana Luiza Camozzato, Cláudia Godinho, Renata Kochhann, Artur Schuh, Vanessa Lopes De Almeida, Jeffrey Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and agreement analyses between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and dementia diagnostic criteria (gold standard), Blessed Dementia Rating scale (BDRS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition, Revised (DSM III-R) criteria for severity. In a sample of 343 Southern Brazilian participants, CDR was consecutively assessed in 295 dementia patients (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and questionable) and 48 healthy elderly. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable Alzheimer disease and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for probable vascular dementia were the gold standard. A battery of cognitive tests and the Mini Mental State Examination (as a screening test at study entry) were also applied. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained through contingency tables. Validity and reliability were measured through κ coefficient, Kendall b, and percent agreement. CDR agreement among raters was demonstrated by percent agreement. Agreement to gold standard was good (κ=0.75), as well as to the Blessed scale (κ=0.73), and excellent to the DSM III-R (κ=0.78). CDR detection of dementia among healthy elderly or questionable dementia was 86% and 80% sensitive, respectively, and 100% specific for both settings. In conclusion, agreement of CDR global score with the gold standard was good, and diagnostic values were high.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-217
Number of pages8
JournalAlzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007

Fingerprint

Dementia
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Alzheimer Disease
Vascular Dementia
Intelligence Tests
Neurosciences
Reproducibility of Results
Stroke
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Agreement analysis
  • Blessed Dementia Scale
  • Brazil
  • Clinical Dementia Rating Scale
  • Dementia
  • DSM III-R
  • MMSE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients. / Fagundes Chaves, Márcia Lorena; Camozzato, Ana Luiza; Godinho, Cláudia; Kochhann, Renata; Schuh, Artur; De Almeida, Vanessa Lopes; Kaye, Jeffrey.

In: Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, Vol. 21, No. 3, 07.2007, p. 210-217.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fagundes Chaves, Márcia Lorena ; Camozzato, Ana Luiza ; Godinho, Cláudia ; Kochhann, Renata ; Schuh, Artur ; De Almeida, Vanessa Lopes ; Kaye, Jeffrey. / Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients. In: Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 210-217.
@article{1ec703b3f1284082bcada1e7fabfa08d,
title = "Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and agreement analyses between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and dementia diagnostic criteria (gold standard), Blessed Dementia Rating scale (BDRS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition, Revised (DSM III-R) criteria for severity. In a sample of 343 Southern Brazilian participants, CDR was consecutively assessed in 295 dementia patients (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and questionable) and 48 healthy elderly. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable Alzheimer disease and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherch{\'e} et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for probable vascular dementia were the gold standard. A battery of cognitive tests and the Mini Mental State Examination (as a screening test at study entry) were also applied. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained through contingency tables. Validity and reliability were measured through κ coefficient, Kendall b, and percent agreement. CDR agreement among raters was demonstrated by percent agreement. Agreement to gold standard was good (κ=0.75), as well as to the Blessed scale (κ=0.73), and excellent to the DSM III-R (κ=0.78). CDR detection of dementia among healthy elderly or questionable dementia was 86{\%} and 80{\%} sensitive, respectively, and 100{\%} specific for both settings. In conclusion, agreement of CDR global score with the gold standard was good, and diagnostic values were high.",
keywords = "Agreement analysis, Blessed Dementia Scale, Brazil, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, Dementia, DSM III-R, MMSE",
author = "{Fagundes Chaves}, {M{\'a}rcia Lorena} and Camozzato, {Ana Luiza} and Cl{\'a}udia Godinho and Renata Kochhann and Artur Schuh and {De Almeida}, {Vanessa Lopes} and Jeffrey Kaye",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/WAD.0b013e31811ff2b4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "210--217",
journal = "Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders",
issn = "0893-0341",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of the clinical dementia rating scale for the detection and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients

AU - Fagundes Chaves, Márcia Lorena

AU - Camozzato, Ana Luiza

AU - Godinho, Cláudia

AU - Kochhann, Renata

AU - Schuh, Artur

AU - De Almeida, Vanessa Lopes

AU - Kaye, Jeffrey

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and agreement analyses between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and dementia diagnostic criteria (gold standard), Blessed Dementia Rating scale (BDRS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition, Revised (DSM III-R) criteria for severity. In a sample of 343 Southern Brazilian participants, CDR was consecutively assessed in 295 dementia patients (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and questionable) and 48 healthy elderly. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable Alzheimer disease and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for probable vascular dementia were the gold standard. A battery of cognitive tests and the Mini Mental State Examination (as a screening test at study entry) were also applied. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained through contingency tables. Validity and reliability were measured through κ coefficient, Kendall b, and percent agreement. CDR agreement among raters was demonstrated by percent agreement. Agreement to gold standard was good (κ=0.75), as well as to the Blessed scale (κ=0.73), and excellent to the DSM III-R (κ=0.78). CDR detection of dementia among healthy elderly or questionable dementia was 86% and 80% sensitive, respectively, and 100% specific for both settings. In conclusion, agreement of CDR global score with the gold standard was good, and diagnostic values were high.

AB - The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and agreement analyses between Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and dementia diagnostic criteria (gold standard), Blessed Dementia Rating scale (BDRS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition, Revised (DSM III-R) criteria for severity. In a sample of 343 Southern Brazilian participants, CDR was consecutively assessed in 295 dementia patients (Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, and questionable) and 48 healthy elderly. The National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria for probable Alzheimer disease and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherché et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) for probable vascular dementia were the gold standard. A battery of cognitive tests and the Mini Mental State Examination (as a screening test at study entry) were also applied. Sensitivity and specificity were obtained through contingency tables. Validity and reliability were measured through κ coefficient, Kendall b, and percent agreement. CDR agreement among raters was demonstrated by percent agreement. Agreement to gold standard was good (κ=0.75), as well as to the Blessed scale (κ=0.73), and excellent to the DSM III-R (κ=0.78). CDR detection of dementia among healthy elderly or questionable dementia was 86% and 80% sensitive, respectively, and 100% specific for both settings. In conclusion, agreement of CDR global score with the gold standard was good, and diagnostic values were high.

KW - Agreement analysis

KW - Blessed Dementia Scale

KW - Brazil

KW - Clinical Dementia Rating Scale

KW - Dementia

KW - DSM III-R

KW - MMSE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548426482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548426482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31811ff2b4

DO - 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31811ff2b4

M3 - Article

C2 - 17804953

AN - SCOPUS:34548426482

VL - 21

SP - 210

EP - 217

JO - Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

JF - Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

SN - 0893-0341

IS - 3

ER -