Validation of FRC, a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, in a Cohort of Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study

Bruce Ettinger, Hau Liu, Terri Blackwell, Andrew R. Hoffman, Kristine E. Ensrud, Eric Orwoll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) in 5893 men who participated in the baseline visit (March 2000-April 2002) of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. FRC estimates for 10-yr hip and major osteoporotic (hip, clinical spine, forearm, and shoulder) fractures were calculated and compared with observed 10-yr fracture probabilities. Possible enhancement of the tool's performance when bone mineral density (BMD) was included was evaluated by comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and by Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). A total of 5893 men were followed-up for an average of 8.4. yr. For most quintiles of predicted fracture risk, the ratios of observed to predicted probabilities were close to unity. Area under the curves improved when BMD was included (p<0.001; 0.79 vs 0.71 for hip fracture and 0.70 vs 0.66 for major osteoporotic fracture, respectively). Using National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical treatment thresholds, BMD inclusion increased NRI significantly, 8.5% (p<0.01) for hip and 4.0% (p=0.01) for major osteoporotic fracture. We conclude that the FRC calibrates well with hip and major osteoporotic fractures observed among older men. Further, addition of BMD to the fracture risk calculation improves the tool's performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-342
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Osteoporotic Fractures
Bone Density
Hip
Shoulder Fractures
Hip Fractures
Forearm
ROC Curve
Osteoporosis
Area Under Curve
Spine
Odds Ratio
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Fracture
  • Men
  • Prediction
  • Risk assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Validation of FRC, a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, in a Cohort of Older Men : The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. / Ettinger, Bruce; Liu, Hau; Blackwell, Terri; Hoffman, Andrew R.; Ensrud, Kristine E.; Orwoll, Eric.

In: Journal of Clinical Densitometry, Vol. 15, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 334-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ettinger, Bruce ; Liu, Hau ; Blackwell, Terri ; Hoffman, Andrew R. ; Ensrud, Kristine E. ; Orwoll, Eric. / Validation of FRC, a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, in a Cohort of Older Men : The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. In: Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2012 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 334-342.
@article{96d4c2cad8114b17bf3466d84ec3dd4a,
title = "Validation of FRC, a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, in a Cohort of Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study",
abstract = "We evaluated the performance of the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) in 5893 men who participated in the baseline visit (March 2000-April 2002) of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. FRC estimates for 10-yr hip and major osteoporotic (hip, clinical spine, forearm, and shoulder) fractures were calculated and compared with observed 10-yr fracture probabilities. Possible enhancement of the tool's performance when bone mineral density (BMD) was included was evaluated by comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and by Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). A total of 5893 men were followed-up for an average of 8.4. yr. For most quintiles of predicted fracture risk, the ratios of observed to predicted probabilities were close to unity. Area under the curves improved when BMD was included (p<0.001; 0.79 vs 0.71 for hip fracture and 0.70 vs 0.66 for major osteoporotic fracture, respectively). Using National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical treatment thresholds, BMD inclusion increased NRI significantly, 8.5{\%} (p<0.01) for hip and 4.0{\%} (p=0.01) for major osteoporotic fracture. We conclude that the FRC calibrates well with hip and major osteoporotic fractures observed among older men. Further, addition of BMD to the fracture risk calculation improves the tool's performance.",
keywords = "Fracture, Men, Prediction, Risk assessment",
author = "Bruce Ettinger and Hau Liu and Terri Blackwell and Hoffman, {Andrew R.} and Ensrud, {Kristine E.} and Eric Orwoll",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "334--342",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Densitometry",
issn = "1094-6950",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of FRC, a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, in a Cohort of Older Men

T2 - The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study

AU - Ettinger, Bruce

AU - Liu, Hau

AU - Blackwell, Terri

AU - Hoffman, Andrew R.

AU - Ensrud, Kristine E.

AU - Orwoll, Eric

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - We evaluated the performance of the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) in 5893 men who participated in the baseline visit (March 2000-April 2002) of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. FRC estimates for 10-yr hip and major osteoporotic (hip, clinical spine, forearm, and shoulder) fractures were calculated and compared with observed 10-yr fracture probabilities. Possible enhancement of the tool's performance when bone mineral density (BMD) was included was evaluated by comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and by Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). A total of 5893 men were followed-up for an average of 8.4. yr. For most quintiles of predicted fracture risk, the ratios of observed to predicted probabilities were close to unity. Area under the curves improved when BMD was included (p<0.001; 0.79 vs 0.71 for hip fracture and 0.70 vs 0.66 for major osteoporotic fracture, respectively). Using National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical treatment thresholds, BMD inclusion increased NRI significantly, 8.5% (p<0.01) for hip and 4.0% (p=0.01) for major osteoporotic fracture. We conclude that the FRC calibrates well with hip and major osteoporotic fractures observed among older men. Further, addition of BMD to the fracture risk calculation improves the tool's performance.

AB - We evaluated the performance of the Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) in 5893 men who participated in the baseline visit (March 2000-April 2002) of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. FRC estimates for 10-yr hip and major osteoporotic (hip, clinical spine, forearm, and shoulder) fractures were calculated and compared with observed 10-yr fracture probabilities. Possible enhancement of the tool's performance when bone mineral density (BMD) was included was evaluated by comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves and by Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). A total of 5893 men were followed-up for an average of 8.4. yr. For most quintiles of predicted fracture risk, the ratios of observed to predicted probabilities were close to unity. Area under the curves improved when BMD was included (p<0.001; 0.79 vs 0.71 for hip fracture and 0.70 vs 0.66 for major osteoporotic fracture, respectively). Using National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical treatment thresholds, BMD inclusion increased NRI significantly, 8.5% (p<0.01) for hip and 4.0% (p=0.01) for major osteoporotic fracture. We conclude that the FRC calibrates well with hip and major osteoporotic fractures observed among older men. Further, addition of BMD to the fracture risk calculation improves the tool's performance.

KW - Fracture

KW - Men

KW - Prediction

KW - Risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864319253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864319253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 22445858

AN - SCOPUS:84864319253

VL - 15

SP - 334

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Clinical Densitometry

JF - Journal of Clinical Densitometry

SN - 1094-6950

IS - 3

ER -