Validation of a novel smartphone application-enabled, patient-operated skin barrier device

Erin E. Grinich, Anuja V. Shah, Eric Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards. Materials and Methods: GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n = 50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (r s ) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability. Results: Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 r s :0.48; Trial 2 r s :0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 r s :0.63; Trial 2 r s :0.45). GPSkin demonstrated “good” test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators. Conclusion: Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSkin Research and Technology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cornea
Equipment and Supplies
Skin
Water
Research Personnel
Education
Industry
Smartphone
Atopic Dermatitis
Reproducibility of Results
Permeability
Healthy Volunteers
Clinical Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • atopic dermatitis
  • barrier
  • capacitance
  • device
  • hydration
  • transepidermal water loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Validation of a novel smartphone application-enabled, patient-operated skin barrier device. / Grinich, Erin E.; Shah, Anuja V.; Simpson, Eric.

In: Skin Research and Technology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a3c8011ae55047228d064dcaceaae0b2,
title = "Validation of a novel smartphone application-enabled, patient-operated skin barrier device",
abstract = "Background: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards. Materials and Methods: GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n = 50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (r s ) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability. Results: Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 r s :0.48; Trial 2 r s :0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 r s :0.63; Trial 2 r s :0.45). GPSkin demonstrated “good” test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators. Conclusion: Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.",
keywords = "atopic dermatitis, barrier, capacitance, device, hydration, transepidermal water loss",
author = "Grinich, {Erin E.} and Shah, {Anuja V.} and Eric Simpson",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/srt.12692",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Skin Research and Technology",
issn = "0909-752X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a novel smartphone application-enabled, patient-operated skin barrier device

AU - Grinich, Erin E.

AU - Shah, Anuja V.

AU - Simpson, Eric

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards. Materials and Methods: GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n = 50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (r s ) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability. Results: Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 r s :0.48; Trial 2 r s :0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 r s :0.63; Trial 2 r s :0.45). GPSkin demonstrated “good” test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators. Conclusion: Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.

AB - Background: Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards. Materials and Methods: GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n = 50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (r s ) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability. Results: Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 r s :0.48; Trial 2 r s :0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 r s :0.63; Trial 2 r s :0.45). GPSkin demonstrated “good” test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators. Conclusion: Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.

KW - atopic dermatitis

KW - barrier

KW - capacitance

KW - device

KW - hydration

KW - transepidermal water loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063784763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063784763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/srt.12692

DO - 10.1111/srt.12692

M3 - Article

JO - Skin Research and Technology

JF - Skin Research and Technology

SN - 0909-752X

ER -