Validation and Comparison of a Brief Instrument vs a Single-Item Screen to Predict Entry to Family Medicine at Matriculation to Medical School

Amanda Kost, Rebecca E. Cantone, Benjamin (Ben) Schneider, Tomoko Sairenji, Ryan Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A strong US primary care workforce is necessary to meet health care needs, yet fewer than 9% of allopathic medical students choose family medicine each year. No validated instrument exists to identify students likely to enter family medicine upon medical school matriculation.

METHODS: A subset of a larger survey at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) was used to create the Family Medicine Interest Survey (FMIS), a 15-item instrument to predict eventual practice in family medicine for a 2003-2007 matriculating cohort. A single-item screen asking about top specialty choice was administered at UWSOM for the same cohort and for a 2006-2012 matriculating cohort of students at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Test performance measures including D (discrimination) and Cronbach α were calculated. Logistic regression determined whether FMIS score or reporting family medicine as the top specialty choice predicted family medicine practice for 601 UWSOM graduates or family medicine residency match for 744 OHSU graduates.

RESULTS: The FMIS is reliable (Cronbach α=0.76). Both tests significantly predicted the probability of entering family medicine. Listing family medicine as the preferred specialty choice yielded a 47% predicted probability for UWSOM graduates entering family medicine. OHSU graduates listing family medicine first had an eightfold odds of matching to family medicine residencies. Combining the two instruments for UWSOM graduates showed a dose-response curve for predicted probability of entering family medicine with increasing levels of interest.

CONCLUSION: Each screening tool can predict students more likely to enter family medicine upon matriculation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)672-678
Number of pages7
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medical Schools
Medicine
Family Practice
Internship and Residency
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Validation and Comparison of a Brief Instrument vs a Single-Item Screen to Predict Entry to Family Medicine at Matriculation to Medical School. / Kost, Amanda; Cantone, Rebecca E.; Schneider, Benjamin (Ben); Sairenji, Tomoko; Palmer, Ryan.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 9, 01.10.2018, p. 672-678.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b69d92ca2ca49728021ecd539d25ea5,
title = "Validation and Comparison of a Brief Instrument vs a Single-Item Screen to Predict Entry to Family Medicine at Matriculation to Medical School",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A strong US primary care workforce is necessary to meet health care needs, yet fewer than 9{\%} of allopathic medical students choose family medicine each year. No validated instrument exists to identify students likely to enter family medicine upon medical school matriculation.METHODS: A subset of a larger survey at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) was used to create the Family Medicine Interest Survey (FMIS), a 15-item instrument to predict eventual practice in family medicine for a 2003-2007 matriculating cohort. A single-item screen asking about top specialty choice was administered at UWSOM for the same cohort and for a 2006-2012 matriculating cohort of students at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Test performance measures including D (discrimination) and Cronbach α were calculated. Logistic regression determined whether FMIS score or reporting family medicine as the top specialty choice predicted family medicine practice for 601 UWSOM graduates or family medicine residency match for 744 OHSU graduates.RESULTS: The FMIS is reliable (Cronbach α=0.76). Both tests significantly predicted the probability of entering family medicine. Listing family medicine as the preferred specialty choice yielded a 47{\%} predicted probability for UWSOM graduates entering family medicine. OHSU graduates listing family medicine first had an eightfold odds of matching to family medicine residencies. Combining the two instruments for UWSOM graduates showed a dose-response curve for predicted probability of entering family medicine with increasing levels of interest.CONCLUSION: Each screening tool can predict students more likely to enter family medicine upon matriculation.",
author = "Amanda Kost and Cantone, {Rebecca E.} and Schneider, {Benjamin (Ben)} and Tomoko Sairenji and Ryan Palmer",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22454/FamMed.2018.258795",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "672--678",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation and Comparison of a Brief Instrument vs a Single-Item Screen to Predict Entry to Family Medicine at Matriculation to Medical School

AU - Kost, Amanda

AU - Cantone, Rebecca E.

AU - Schneider, Benjamin (Ben)

AU - Sairenji, Tomoko

AU - Palmer, Ryan

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A strong US primary care workforce is necessary to meet health care needs, yet fewer than 9% of allopathic medical students choose family medicine each year. No validated instrument exists to identify students likely to enter family medicine upon medical school matriculation.METHODS: A subset of a larger survey at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) was used to create the Family Medicine Interest Survey (FMIS), a 15-item instrument to predict eventual practice in family medicine for a 2003-2007 matriculating cohort. A single-item screen asking about top specialty choice was administered at UWSOM for the same cohort and for a 2006-2012 matriculating cohort of students at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Test performance measures including D (discrimination) and Cronbach α were calculated. Logistic regression determined whether FMIS score or reporting family medicine as the top specialty choice predicted family medicine practice for 601 UWSOM graduates or family medicine residency match for 744 OHSU graduates.RESULTS: The FMIS is reliable (Cronbach α=0.76). Both tests significantly predicted the probability of entering family medicine. Listing family medicine as the preferred specialty choice yielded a 47% predicted probability for UWSOM graduates entering family medicine. OHSU graduates listing family medicine first had an eightfold odds of matching to family medicine residencies. Combining the two instruments for UWSOM graduates showed a dose-response curve for predicted probability of entering family medicine with increasing levels of interest.CONCLUSION: Each screening tool can predict students more likely to enter family medicine upon matriculation.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A strong US primary care workforce is necessary to meet health care needs, yet fewer than 9% of allopathic medical students choose family medicine each year. No validated instrument exists to identify students likely to enter family medicine upon medical school matriculation.METHODS: A subset of a larger survey at the University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) was used to create the Family Medicine Interest Survey (FMIS), a 15-item instrument to predict eventual practice in family medicine for a 2003-2007 matriculating cohort. A single-item screen asking about top specialty choice was administered at UWSOM for the same cohort and for a 2006-2012 matriculating cohort of students at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Test performance measures including D (discrimination) and Cronbach α were calculated. Logistic regression determined whether FMIS score or reporting family medicine as the top specialty choice predicted family medicine practice for 601 UWSOM graduates or family medicine residency match for 744 OHSU graduates.RESULTS: The FMIS is reliable (Cronbach α=0.76). Both tests significantly predicted the probability of entering family medicine. Listing family medicine as the preferred specialty choice yielded a 47% predicted probability for UWSOM graduates entering family medicine. OHSU graduates listing family medicine first had an eightfold odds of matching to family medicine residencies. Combining the two instruments for UWSOM graduates showed a dose-response curve for predicted probability of entering family medicine with increasing levels of interest.CONCLUSION: Each screening tool can predict students more likely to enter family medicine upon matriculation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054773660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054773660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22454/FamMed.2018.258795

DO - 10.22454/FamMed.2018.258795

M3 - Article

C2 - 30307584

AN - SCOPUS:85054773660

VL - 50

SP - 672

EP - 678

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 9

ER -