Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: Is it safe?

Alison Cahill, David M. Stamilio, Emmanuelle Pare, Jeffrey P. Peipert, Erika J. Stevens, Deborah B. Nelson, George A. Macones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt, VBAC failure, and major maternal adverse outcomes in women with a previous cesarean with twin or singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study between the years 1996 and 2000. Subjects were identified by ICD-9 code. Trained research nurses collected medical record data on the outcome of VBAC attempts, and clinical outcomes, including uterine rupture and major operative injuries. We used bivariate and multivariable techniques to assess the association between twins and the outcomes. Results: Of 25,005 patients with at least 1 previous cesarean, there were 535 twin pregnancies and 24,307 singleton pregnancies. Compared with patients with singleton gestations, patients with twins were less likely to attempt a VBAC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but no more likely to have a VBAC failure (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), a uterine rupture (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.6), or a major maternal morbidity (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7). Conclusion: Women with twin gestations are less likely to attempt a VBAC, but they are no more likely to fail a VBAC trial or experience a major morbid event compared with women with singleton gestations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1050-1055
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume193
Issue number3 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
Twin Pregnancy
Pregnancy
Odds Ratio
Uterine Rupture
International Classification of Diseases
Mothers
Medical Records
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Nurses
Morbidity
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Twins
  • Vaginal birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Cahill, A., Stamilio, D. M., Pare, E., Peipert, J. P., Stevens, E. J., Nelson, D. B., & Macones, G. A. (2005). Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: Is it safe? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(3 SUPPL.), 1050-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038

Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies : Is it safe? / Cahill, Alison; Stamilio, David M.; Pare, Emmanuelle; Peipert, Jeffrey P.; Stevens, Erika J.; Nelson, Deborah B.; Macones, George A.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 193, No. 3 SUPPL., 09.2005, p. 1050-1055.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cahill, A, Stamilio, DM, Pare, E, Peipert, JP, Stevens, EJ, Nelson, DB & Macones, GA 2005, 'Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: Is it safe?', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 193, no. 3 SUPPL., pp. 1050-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038
Cahill, Alison ; Stamilio, David M. ; Pare, Emmanuelle ; Peipert, Jeffrey P. ; Stevens, Erika J. ; Nelson, Deborah B. ; Macones, George A. / Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies : Is it safe?. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 ; Vol. 193, No. 3 SUPPL. pp. 1050-1055.
@article{2596072bc8e64ea4b28606b1f85130eb,
title = "Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies: Is it safe?",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt, VBAC failure, and major maternal adverse outcomes in women with a previous cesarean with twin or singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study between the years 1996 and 2000. Subjects were identified by ICD-9 code. Trained research nurses collected medical record data on the outcome of VBAC attempts, and clinical outcomes, including uterine rupture and major operative injuries. We used bivariate and multivariable techniques to assess the association between twins and the outcomes. Results: Of 25,005 patients with at least 1 previous cesarean, there were 535 twin pregnancies and 24,307 singleton pregnancies. Compared with patients with singleton gestations, patients with twins were less likely to attempt a VBAC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.3, 95{\%} CI 0.2-0.4), but no more likely to have a VBAC failure (AOR 1.1, 95{\%} CI 0.8-1.6), a uterine rupture (AOR 1.2, 95{\%} CI 0.3-4.6), or a major maternal morbidity (AOR 1.6, 95{\%} CI 0.7-3.7). Conclusion: Women with twin gestations are less likely to attempt a VBAC, but they are no more likely to fail a VBAC trial or experience a major morbid event compared with women with singleton gestations.",
keywords = "Cesarean delivery, Twins, Vaginal birth",
author = "Alison Cahill and Stamilio, {David M.} and Emmanuelle Pare and Peipert, {Jeffrey P.} and Stevens, {Erika J.} and Nelson, {Deborah B.} and Macones, {George A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "193",
pages = "1050--1055",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies

T2 - Is it safe?

AU - Cahill, Alison

AU - Stamilio, David M.

AU - Pare, Emmanuelle

AU - Peipert, Jeffrey P.

AU - Stevens, Erika J.

AU - Nelson, Deborah B.

AU - Macones, George A.

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt, VBAC failure, and major maternal adverse outcomes in women with a previous cesarean with twin or singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study between the years 1996 and 2000. Subjects were identified by ICD-9 code. Trained research nurses collected medical record data on the outcome of VBAC attempts, and clinical outcomes, including uterine rupture and major operative injuries. We used bivariate and multivariable techniques to assess the association between twins and the outcomes. Results: Of 25,005 patients with at least 1 previous cesarean, there were 535 twin pregnancies and 24,307 singleton pregnancies. Compared with patients with singleton gestations, patients with twins were less likely to attempt a VBAC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but no more likely to have a VBAC failure (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), a uterine rupture (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.6), or a major maternal morbidity (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7). Conclusion: Women with twin gestations are less likely to attempt a VBAC, but they are no more likely to fail a VBAC trial or experience a major morbid event compared with women with singleton gestations.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt, VBAC failure, and major maternal adverse outcomes in women with a previous cesarean with twin or singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study between the years 1996 and 2000. Subjects were identified by ICD-9 code. Trained research nurses collected medical record data on the outcome of VBAC attempts, and clinical outcomes, including uterine rupture and major operative injuries. We used bivariate and multivariable techniques to assess the association between twins and the outcomes. Results: Of 25,005 patients with at least 1 previous cesarean, there were 535 twin pregnancies and 24,307 singleton pregnancies. Compared with patients with singleton gestations, patients with twins were less likely to attempt a VBAC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but no more likely to have a VBAC failure (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), a uterine rupture (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.6), or a major maternal morbidity (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7). Conclusion: Women with twin gestations are less likely to attempt a VBAC, but they are no more likely to fail a VBAC trial or experience a major morbid event compared with women with singleton gestations.

KW - Cesarean delivery

KW - Twins

KW - Vaginal birth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644462750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24644462750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038

M3 - Article

C2 - 16157110

AN - SCOPUS:24644462750

VL - 193

SP - 1050

EP - 1055

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3 SUPPL.

ER -