UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse

A possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments

A. L. Lyubarsky, B. Falsini, Mark Pennesi, P. Valentini, E. N. Pugh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

221 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Molecular biological, histological and flicker electroretinographic results have established that mice have two cone photopigments, one peaking near 350 nm (UV-cone pigment) and a second near 510 nm [midwave (M)-cone pigment]. The goal of this investigation was to measure the action spectra and absolute sensitivities of the UV-cone- and M-cone-driven b-wave responses of C57BL/6 mice. To achieve this goal, we suppressed rod-driven signals with steady or flashed backgrounds and obtained intensity-response relations for cone-driven b-waves elicited by narrowband flashes between 340 and 600 nm. The derived cone action spectra can be described as retinal pigments with peaks at 355 and 508 nm. The UV peak had an absolute sensitivity of ~8 nV/(photon μm2) at the cornea, approximately fourfold higher than the M peak. In an attempt to isolate UV-cone-driven responses, it was discovered that an orange conditioning flash (λ > 530 nm) completely suppressed ERG signals driven by both M pigment- and UV pigment-containing cones. Analysis showed that the orange flash could not have produced a detectable response in the UV-cone pathway were their no linkage between M pigment- and UV pigment- generated signals. Because cones containing predominantly the UV and M pigments have been shown to be located largely in separate parts of the mouse retina (Szel et al., 1992), the most probable linkage is coexpression of M pigment in cones primarily expressing UV pigment. New histological evidence supports this interpretation (Gloesman and Ahnelt, 1998). Our data are consistent with an upper bound of ~3% coexpression of M pigment in the cones that express mostly the UV pigment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-455
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
Phenotype
Retinal Pigments
Inbred C57BL Mouse
Photons
Cornea
Retina
Action Spectrum

Keywords

  • Cone photoreceptors
  • Cone pigments
  • Cones
  • Electroretinogram
  • Gene coexpression
  • Murine retina
  • Retinal circuitry
  • Retinal sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse : A possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments. / Lyubarsky, A. L.; Falsini, B.; Pennesi, Mark; Valentini, P.; Pugh, E. N.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.01.1999, p. 442-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d01b296919294ccca07d438e6d9ac914,
title = "UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse: A possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments",
abstract = "Molecular biological, histological and flicker electroretinographic results have established that mice have two cone photopigments, one peaking near 350 nm (UV-cone pigment) and a second near 510 nm [midwave (M)-cone pigment]. The goal of this investigation was to measure the action spectra and absolute sensitivities of the UV-cone- and M-cone-driven b-wave responses of C57BL/6 mice. To achieve this goal, we suppressed rod-driven signals with steady or flashed backgrounds and obtained intensity-response relations for cone-driven b-waves elicited by narrowband flashes between 340 and 600 nm. The derived cone action spectra can be described as retinal pigments with peaks at 355 and 508 nm. The UV peak had an absolute sensitivity of ~8 nV/(photon μm2) at the cornea, approximately fourfold higher than the M peak. In an attempt to isolate UV-cone-driven responses, it was discovered that an orange conditioning flash (λ > 530 nm) completely suppressed ERG signals driven by both M pigment- and UV pigment-containing cones. Analysis showed that the orange flash could not have produced a detectable response in the UV-cone pathway were their no linkage between M pigment- and UV pigment- generated signals. Because cones containing predominantly the UV and M pigments have been shown to be located largely in separate parts of the mouse retina (Szel et al., 1992), the most probable linkage is coexpression of M pigment in cones primarily expressing UV pigment. New histological evidence supports this interpretation (Gloesman and Ahnelt, 1998). Our data are consistent with an upper bound of ~3{\%} coexpression of M pigment in the cones that express mostly the UV pigment.",
keywords = "Cone photoreceptors, Cone pigments, Cones, Electroretinogram, Gene coexpression, Murine retina, Retinal circuitry, Retinal sensitivity",
author = "Lyubarsky, {A. L.} and B. Falsini and Mark Pennesi and P. Valentini and Pugh, {E. N.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "442--455",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse

T2 - A possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments

AU - Lyubarsky, A. L.

AU - Falsini, B.

AU - Pennesi, Mark

AU - Valentini, P.

AU - Pugh, E. N.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Molecular biological, histological and flicker electroretinographic results have established that mice have two cone photopigments, one peaking near 350 nm (UV-cone pigment) and a second near 510 nm [midwave (M)-cone pigment]. The goal of this investigation was to measure the action spectra and absolute sensitivities of the UV-cone- and M-cone-driven b-wave responses of C57BL/6 mice. To achieve this goal, we suppressed rod-driven signals with steady or flashed backgrounds and obtained intensity-response relations for cone-driven b-waves elicited by narrowband flashes between 340 and 600 nm. The derived cone action spectra can be described as retinal pigments with peaks at 355 and 508 nm. The UV peak had an absolute sensitivity of ~8 nV/(photon μm2) at the cornea, approximately fourfold higher than the M peak. In an attempt to isolate UV-cone-driven responses, it was discovered that an orange conditioning flash (λ > 530 nm) completely suppressed ERG signals driven by both M pigment- and UV pigment-containing cones. Analysis showed that the orange flash could not have produced a detectable response in the UV-cone pathway were their no linkage between M pigment- and UV pigment- generated signals. Because cones containing predominantly the UV and M pigments have been shown to be located largely in separate parts of the mouse retina (Szel et al., 1992), the most probable linkage is coexpression of M pigment in cones primarily expressing UV pigment. New histological evidence supports this interpretation (Gloesman and Ahnelt, 1998). Our data are consistent with an upper bound of ~3% coexpression of M pigment in the cones that express mostly the UV pigment.

AB - Molecular biological, histological and flicker electroretinographic results have established that mice have two cone photopigments, one peaking near 350 nm (UV-cone pigment) and a second near 510 nm [midwave (M)-cone pigment]. The goal of this investigation was to measure the action spectra and absolute sensitivities of the UV-cone- and M-cone-driven b-wave responses of C57BL/6 mice. To achieve this goal, we suppressed rod-driven signals with steady or flashed backgrounds and obtained intensity-response relations for cone-driven b-waves elicited by narrowband flashes between 340 and 600 nm. The derived cone action spectra can be described as retinal pigments with peaks at 355 and 508 nm. The UV peak had an absolute sensitivity of ~8 nV/(photon μm2) at the cornea, approximately fourfold higher than the M peak. In an attempt to isolate UV-cone-driven responses, it was discovered that an orange conditioning flash (λ > 530 nm) completely suppressed ERG signals driven by both M pigment- and UV pigment-containing cones. Analysis showed that the orange flash could not have produced a detectable response in the UV-cone pathway were their no linkage between M pigment- and UV pigment- generated signals. Because cones containing predominantly the UV and M pigments have been shown to be located largely in separate parts of the mouse retina (Szel et al., 1992), the most probable linkage is coexpression of M pigment in cones primarily expressing UV pigment. New histological evidence supports this interpretation (Gloesman and Ahnelt, 1998). Our data are consistent with an upper bound of ~3% coexpression of M pigment in the cones that express mostly the UV pigment.

KW - Cone photoreceptors

KW - Cone pigments

KW - Cones

KW - Electroretinogram

KW - Gene coexpression

KW - Murine retina

KW - Retinal circuitry

KW - Retinal sensitivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032938357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032938357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 442

EP - 455

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 1

ER -