Using Maslow’s hierarchy to highlight power imbalances between visiting health professional student volunteers and the host community: An applied qualitative study

Tracey Evans, Orezioghene Akporuno, Katrina M. Owens, Brittany Lickers, Jazmin Marlinga, Henry Lin, Lawrence C. Loh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Health professional students from high-income countries increasingly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) conducted abroad. One common criticism of STEGH is the inherent power differential that exists between visiting learners and the local community. To highlight this power differential, this paper explores perceived benefits as described by volunteer and community respondents and applies Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to commonly identified themes in each respondent group. Methods: A semistructured survey was used to collect qualitative responses from both volunteers and community members located in a Dominican Republic community, that is, a hotspot for traditionally conducted STEGH. Thematic analysis identified themes of perceived benefits from both respondent groups; each group’s common themes were then classified and compared within Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Results: Each respondent group identified resource provision as a perceived benefit of STEGH, but volunteer respondents primarily focused on the provision of highly-skilled, complex resources while community respondents focused on basic necessities (food, water, etc.) Volunteer respondents were also the only group to also mention spiritual/religious/life experiences, personal skills development, and relationships as perceived benefits. Applying Maslow’s hierarchy thus demonstrates a difference in needs: community respondents focused on benefits that address deficiency needs at the bottom of the hierarchy while volunteers focused on benefits addressing self-transcendence/actualization needs at the top of the hierarchy. Conclusions: The perceived difference in needs met by STEGH between volunteers and the host community within Maslow’s hierarchy may drive an inherent power differential. Refocusing STEGH on the relationship level of the hierarchy (i.e., focusing on partnerships) might help mitigate this imbalance and empower host communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-139
Number of pages7
JournalEducation for Health: Change in Learning and Practice
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

health professionals
health
experience
community
student
Group
Dominican Republic
transcendence
resources
criticism
food
income
water

Keywords

  • Education
  • Ethics
  • Global health
  • Medical education
  • Medical missions
  • Volunteering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Using Maslow’s hierarchy to highlight power imbalances between visiting health professional student volunteers and the host community : An applied qualitative study. / Evans, Tracey; Akporuno, Orezioghene; Owens, Katrina M.; Lickers, Brittany; Marlinga, Jazmin; Lin, Henry; Loh, Lawrence C.

In: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 133-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, Tracey ; Akporuno, Orezioghene ; Owens, Katrina M. ; Lickers, Brittany ; Marlinga, Jazmin ; Lin, Henry ; Loh, Lawrence C. / Using Maslow’s hierarchy to highlight power imbalances between visiting health professional student volunteers and the host community : An applied qualitative study. In: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 133-139.
@article{0ae0963fc4fd4c579f35e7866b69f3af,
title = "Using Maslow’s hierarchy to highlight power imbalances between visiting health professional student volunteers and the host community: An applied qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: Health professional students from high-income countries increasingly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) conducted abroad. One common criticism of STEGH is the inherent power differential that exists between visiting learners and the local community. To highlight this power differential, this paper explores perceived benefits as described by volunteer and community respondents and applies Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to commonly identified themes in each respondent group. Methods: A semistructured survey was used to collect qualitative responses from both volunteers and community members located in a Dominican Republic community, that is, a hotspot for traditionally conducted STEGH. Thematic analysis identified themes of perceived benefits from both respondent groups; each group’s common themes were then classified and compared within Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Results: Each respondent group identified resource provision as a perceived benefit of STEGH, but volunteer respondents primarily focused on the provision of highly-skilled, complex resources while community respondents focused on basic necessities (food, water, etc.) Volunteer respondents were also the only group to also mention spiritual/religious/life experiences, personal skills development, and relationships as perceived benefits. Applying Maslow’s hierarchy thus demonstrates a difference in needs: community respondents focused on benefits that address deficiency needs at the bottom of the hierarchy while volunteers focused on benefits addressing self-transcendence/actualization needs at the top of the hierarchy. Conclusions: The perceived difference in needs met by STEGH between volunteers and the host community within Maslow’s hierarchy may drive an inherent power differential. Refocusing STEGH on the relationship level of the hierarchy (i.e., focusing on partnerships) might help mitigate this imbalance and empower host communities.",
keywords = "Education, Ethics, Global health, Medical education, Medical missions, Volunteering",
author = "Tracey Evans and Orezioghene Akporuno and Owens, {Katrina M.} and Brittany Lickers and Jazmin Marlinga and Henry Lin and Loh, {Lawrence C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/efh.EfH_175_16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "133--139",
journal = "Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice",
issn = "1357-6283",
publisher = "Network: Towards Unity for Health",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Maslow’s hierarchy to highlight power imbalances between visiting health professional student volunteers and the host community

T2 - An applied qualitative study

AU - Evans, Tracey

AU - Akporuno, Orezioghene

AU - Owens, Katrina M.

AU - Lickers, Brittany

AU - Marlinga, Jazmin

AU - Lin, Henry

AU - Loh, Lawrence C.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Background: Health professional students from high-income countries increasingly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) conducted abroad. One common criticism of STEGH is the inherent power differential that exists between visiting learners and the local community. To highlight this power differential, this paper explores perceived benefits as described by volunteer and community respondents and applies Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to commonly identified themes in each respondent group. Methods: A semistructured survey was used to collect qualitative responses from both volunteers and community members located in a Dominican Republic community, that is, a hotspot for traditionally conducted STEGH. Thematic analysis identified themes of perceived benefits from both respondent groups; each group’s common themes were then classified and compared within Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Results: Each respondent group identified resource provision as a perceived benefit of STEGH, but volunteer respondents primarily focused on the provision of highly-skilled, complex resources while community respondents focused on basic necessities (food, water, etc.) Volunteer respondents were also the only group to also mention spiritual/religious/life experiences, personal skills development, and relationships as perceived benefits. Applying Maslow’s hierarchy thus demonstrates a difference in needs: community respondents focused on benefits that address deficiency needs at the bottom of the hierarchy while volunteers focused on benefits addressing self-transcendence/actualization needs at the top of the hierarchy. Conclusions: The perceived difference in needs met by STEGH between volunteers and the host community within Maslow’s hierarchy may drive an inherent power differential. Refocusing STEGH on the relationship level of the hierarchy (i.e., focusing on partnerships) might help mitigate this imbalance and empower host communities.

AB - Background: Health professional students from high-income countries increasingly participate in short-term experiences in global health (STEGH) conducted abroad. One common criticism of STEGH is the inherent power differential that exists between visiting learners and the local community. To highlight this power differential, this paper explores perceived benefits as described by volunteer and community respondents and applies Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to commonly identified themes in each respondent group. Methods: A semistructured survey was used to collect qualitative responses from both volunteers and community members located in a Dominican Republic community, that is, a hotspot for traditionally conducted STEGH. Thematic analysis identified themes of perceived benefits from both respondent groups; each group’s common themes were then classified and compared within Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Results: Each respondent group identified resource provision as a perceived benefit of STEGH, but volunteer respondents primarily focused on the provision of highly-skilled, complex resources while community respondents focused on basic necessities (food, water, etc.) Volunteer respondents were also the only group to also mention spiritual/religious/life experiences, personal skills development, and relationships as perceived benefits. Applying Maslow’s hierarchy thus demonstrates a difference in needs: community respondents focused on benefits that address deficiency needs at the bottom of the hierarchy while volunteers focused on benefits addressing self-transcendence/actualization needs at the top of the hierarchy. Conclusions: The perceived difference in needs met by STEGH between volunteers and the host community within Maslow’s hierarchy may drive an inherent power differential. Refocusing STEGH on the relationship level of the hierarchy (i.e., focusing on partnerships) might help mitigate this imbalance and empower host communities.

KW - Education

KW - Ethics

KW - Global health

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical missions

KW - Volunteering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029820374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029820374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/efh.EfH_175_16

DO - 10.4103/efh.EfH_175_16

M3 - Article

C2 - 28928343

AN - SCOPUS:85029820374

VL - 30

SP - 133

EP - 139

JO - Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice

JF - Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice

SN - 1357-6283

IS - 2

ER -