Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting

Susan E. Hickman, Christine A. Nelson, Alvin H. Moss, Bernard J. Hammes, Allison Terwilliger, Ann Jackson, Susan Tolle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program was designed to ensure the full range of patient treatment preferences are honored throughout the health care system. Data are lacking about the use of POLST in the hospice setting. Objective: To assess use of the POLST by hospice programs, attitudes of hospice personnel toward POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments, and the types of treatments options selected by hospice patients. Design: A telephone survey was conducted of all hospice programs in three states (Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia) to assess POLST use. Staff at hospices reporting POLST use (n = 71) were asked additional questions about their attitudes toward the POLST. Chart reviews were conducted at a subsample of POLST-using programs in Oregon (n = 8), West Virginia (n = 5), and Wisconsin (n = 2). Results: The POLST is used widely in hospices in Oregon (100%) and West Virginia (85%) but only regionally in Wisconsin (6%). A majority of hospice staff interviewed believe the POLST is useful at preventing unwanted resuscitation (97%) and at initiating conversations about treatment preferences (96%). Preferences for treatment limitations were respected in 98% of cases and no one received unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, intensive care, or feeding tubes. A majority of hospice patients (78%) with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders wanted more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category such as antibiotics or hospitalization. Conclusions: The POLST is viewed by hospice personnel as useful, helpful, and reliable. It is effective at ensuring preferences for limitations are honored. When given a choice, most hospice patients want the option for more aggressive treatments in selected situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-141
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2009

Fingerprint

Hospice Care
Physicians
Hospices
Therapeutics
Resuscitation Orders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting. / Hickman, Susan E.; Nelson, Christine A.; Moss, Alvin H.; Hammes, Bernard J.; Terwilliger, Allison; Jackson, Ann; Tolle, Susan.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 133-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hickman, Susan E. ; Nelson, Christine A. ; Moss, Alvin H. ; Hammes, Bernard J. ; Terwilliger, Allison ; Jackson, Ann ; Tolle, Susan. / Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting. In: Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 133-141.
@article{ff43b1cde7f043d9ad935a7c48b680c6,
title = "Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting",
abstract = "Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program was designed to ensure the full range of patient treatment preferences are honored throughout the health care system. Data are lacking about the use of POLST in the hospice setting. Objective: To assess use of the POLST by hospice programs, attitudes of hospice personnel toward POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments, and the types of treatments options selected by hospice patients. Design: A telephone survey was conducted of all hospice programs in three states (Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia) to assess POLST use. Staff at hospices reporting POLST use (n = 71) were asked additional questions about their attitudes toward the POLST. Chart reviews were conducted at a subsample of POLST-using programs in Oregon (n = 8), West Virginia (n = 5), and Wisconsin (n = 2). Results: The POLST is used widely in hospices in Oregon (100{\%}) and West Virginia (85{\%}) but only regionally in Wisconsin (6{\%}). A majority of hospice staff interviewed believe the POLST is useful at preventing unwanted resuscitation (97{\%}) and at initiating conversations about treatment preferences (96{\%}). Preferences for treatment limitations were respected in 98{\%} of cases and no one received unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, intensive care, or feeding tubes. A majority of hospice patients (78{\%}) with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders wanted more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category such as antibiotics or hospitalization. Conclusions: The POLST is viewed by hospice personnel as useful, helpful, and reliable. It is effective at ensuring preferences for limitations are honored. When given a choice, most hospice patients want the option for more aggressive treatments in selected situations.",
author = "Hickman, {Susan E.} and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Moss, {Alvin H.} and Hammes, {Bernard J.} and Allison Terwilliger and Ann Jackson and Susan Tolle",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2008.0196",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "133--141",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting

AU - Hickman, Susan E.

AU - Nelson, Christine A.

AU - Moss, Alvin H.

AU - Hammes, Bernard J.

AU - Terwilliger, Allison

AU - Jackson, Ann

AU - Tolle, Susan

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program was designed to ensure the full range of patient treatment preferences are honored throughout the health care system. Data are lacking about the use of POLST in the hospice setting. Objective: To assess use of the POLST by hospice programs, attitudes of hospice personnel toward POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments, and the types of treatments options selected by hospice patients. Design: A telephone survey was conducted of all hospice programs in three states (Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia) to assess POLST use. Staff at hospices reporting POLST use (n = 71) were asked additional questions about their attitudes toward the POLST. Chart reviews were conducted at a subsample of POLST-using programs in Oregon (n = 8), West Virginia (n = 5), and Wisconsin (n = 2). Results: The POLST is used widely in hospices in Oregon (100%) and West Virginia (85%) but only regionally in Wisconsin (6%). A majority of hospice staff interviewed believe the POLST is useful at preventing unwanted resuscitation (97%) and at initiating conversations about treatment preferences (96%). Preferences for treatment limitations were respected in 98% of cases and no one received unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, intensive care, or feeding tubes. A majority of hospice patients (78%) with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders wanted more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category such as antibiotics or hospitalization. Conclusions: The POLST is viewed by hospice personnel as useful, helpful, and reliable. It is effective at ensuring preferences for limitations are honored. When given a choice, most hospice patients want the option for more aggressive treatments in selected situations.

AB - Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm Program was designed to ensure the full range of patient treatment preferences are honored throughout the health care system. Data are lacking about the use of POLST in the hospice setting. Objective: To assess use of the POLST by hospice programs, attitudes of hospice personnel toward POLST, the effect of POLST on the use of life-sustaining treatments, and the types of treatments options selected by hospice patients. Design: A telephone survey was conducted of all hospice programs in three states (Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia) to assess POLST use. Staff at hospices reporting POLST use (n = 71) were asked additional questions about their attitudes toward the POLST. Chart reviews were conducted at a subsample of POLST-using programs in Oregon (n = 8), West Virginia (n = 5), and Wisconsin (n = 2). Results: The POLST is used widely in hospices in Oregon (100%) and West Virginia (85%) but only regionally in Wisconsin (6%). A majority of hospice staff interviewed believe the POLST is useful at preventing unwanted resuscitation (97%) and at initiating conversations about treatment preferences (96%). Preferences for treatment limitations were respected in 98% of cases and no one received unwanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), intubation, intensive care, or feeding tubes. A majority of hospice patients (78%) with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders wanted more than the lowest level of treatment in at least one other category such as antibiotics or hospitalization. Conclusions: The POLST is viewed by hospice personnel as useful, helpful, and reliable. It is effective at ensuring preferences for limitations are honored. When given a choice, most hospice patients want the option for more aggressive treatments in selected situations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60049098675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60049098675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2008.0196

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2008.0196

M3 - Article

C2 - 19207056

AN - SCOPUS:60049098675

VL - 12

SP - 133

EP - 141

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 2

ER -