Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients

Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

Marc J. Gollub, Supreeta Arya, Regina G.H. Beets-Tan, Gregory DePrisco, Mithat Gonen, Kartik Jhaveri, Zahra Kassam, Harmeet Kaur, David Kim, Andrea Knezevic, Elena Korngold, Chandana Lall, Neeraj Lalwani, D. Blair Macdonald, Courtney Moreno, Stephanie Nougaret, Perry Pickhardt, Shannon Sheedy, Mukesh Harisinghani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalAbdominal Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 21 2018

Fingerprint

Rectal Diseases
Rectal Neoplasms
Radiology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Guidelines
Carcinoma
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Consensus recommendations
  • Expert panel
  • Rectal cancer
  • Rectal MRI
  • White paper

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology

Cite this

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients : Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. / Gollub, Marc J.; Arya, Supreeta; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.; DePrisco, Gregory; Gonen, Mithat; Jhaveri, Kartik; Kassam, Zahra; Kaur, Harmeet; Kim, David; Knezevic, Andrea; Korngold, Elena; Lall, Chandana; Lalwani, Neeraj; Blair Macdonald, D.; Moreno, Courtney; Nougaret, Stephanie; Pickhardt, Perry; Sheedy, Shannon; Harisinghani, Mukesh.

In: Abdominal Radiology, 21.05.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gollub, MJ, Arya, S, Beets-Tan, RGH, DePrisco, G, Gonen, M, Jhaveri, K, Kassam, Z, Kaur, H, Kim, D, Knezevic, A, Korngold, E, Lall, C, Lalwani, N, Blair Macdonald, D, Moreno, C, Nougaret, S, Pickhardt, P, Sheedy, S & Harisinghani, M 2018, 'Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017', Abdominal Radiology, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9
Gollub, Marc J. ; Arya, Supreeta ; Beets-Tan, Regina G.H. ; DePrisco, Gregory ; Gonen, Mithat ; Jhaveri, Kartik ; Kassam, Zahra ; Kaur, Harmeet ; Kim, David ; Knezevic, Andrea ; Korngold, Elena ; Lall, Chandana ; Lalwani, Neeraj ; Blair Macdonald, D. ; Moreno, Courtney ; Nougaret, Stephanie ; Pickhardt, Perry ; Sheedy, Shannon ; Harisinghani, Mukesh. / Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients : Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. In: Abdominal Radiology. 2018 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{043a2767842b4d3a90ba270861372354,
title = "Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017",
abstract = "Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70{\%} agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70{\%}) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87{\%} of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.",
keywords = "Consensus recommendations, Expert panel, Rectal cancer, Rectal MRI, White paper",
author = "Gollub, {Marc J.} and Supreeta Arya and Beets-Tan, {Regina G.H.} and Gregory DePrisco and Mithat Gonen and Kartik Jhaveri and Zahra Kassam and Harmeet Kaur and David Kim and Andrea Knezevic and Elena Korngold and Chandana Lall and Neeraj Lalwani and {Blair Macdonald}, D. and Courtney Moreno and Stephanie Nougaret and Perry Pickhardt and Shannon Sheedy and Mukesh Harisinghani",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Abdominal Radiology",
issn = "2366-004X",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients

T2 - Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

AU - Gollub, Marc J.

AU - Arya, Supreeta

AU - Beets-Tan, Regina G.H.

AU - DePrisco, Gregory

AU - Gonen, Mithat

AU - Jhaveri, Kartik

AU - Kassam, Zahra

AU - Kaur, Harmeet

AU - Kim, David

AU - Knezevic, Andrea

AU - Korngold, Elena

AU - Lall, Chandana

AU - Lalwani, Neeraj

AU - Blair Macdonald, D.

AU - Moreno, Courtney

AU - Nougaret, Stephanie

AU - Pickhardt, Perry

AU - Sheedy, Shannon

AU - Harisinghani, Mukesh

PY - 2018/5/21

Y1 - 2018/5/21

N2 - Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

AB - Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

KW - Consensus recommendations

KW - Expert panel

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - Rectal MRI

KW - White paper

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047216685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047216685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

DO - 10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

SN - 2366-004X

ER -