Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

Marc J. Gollub; Supreeta Arya; Regina Gh Beets-Tan; Gregory dePrisco; Mithat Gonen; Kartik Jhaveri; Zahra Kassam; Harmeet Kaur; David Kim; Andrea Knezevic; Elena Korngold; Chandana Lall; Neeraj Lalwani; D. Blair Macdonald; Courtney Moreno; Stephanie Nougaret; Perry Pickhardt; Shannon Sheedy; Mukesh Harisinghani

doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

Marc J. Gollub, Supreeta Arya, Regina Gh Beets-Tan, Gregory dePrisco, Mithat Gonen, Kartik Jhaveri, Zahra Kassam, Harmeet Kaur, David Kim, Andrea Knezevic, Elena Korngold, Chandana Lall, Neeraj Lalwani, D. Blair Macdonald, Courtney Moreno, Stephanie Nougaret, Perry Pickhardt, Shannon Sheedy, Mukesh Harisinghani

Diagnostic Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

105 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2893-2902
Number of pages	10
Journal	Abdominal Radiology
Volume	43
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9
State	Published - Nov 1 2018

Keywords

Consensus recommendations
Expert panel
Rectal MRI
Rectal cancer
White paper

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Gastroenterology
Urology

Access to Document

10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

Cite this

Gollub, M. J., Arya, S., Beets-Tan, R. G., dePrisco, G., Gonen, M., Jhaveri, K., Kassam, Z., Kaur, H., Kim, D., Knezevic, A., Korngold, E., Lall, C., Lalwani, N., Blair Macdonald, D., Moreno, C., Nougaret, S., Pickhardt, P., Sheedy, S., & Harisinghani, M. (2018). Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdominal Radiology, 43(11), 2893-2902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

Gollub, MJ, Arya, S, Beets-Tan, RG, dePrisco, G, Gonen, M, Jhaveri, K, Kassam, Z, Kaur, H, Kim, D, Knezevic, A, Korngold, E, Lall, C, Lalwani, N, Blair Macdonald, D, Moreno, C, Nougaret, S, Pickhardt, P, Sheedy, S & Harisinghani, M 2018, 'Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017', Abdominal Radiology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2893-2902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

@article{043a2767842b4d3a90ba270861372354,

title = "Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017",

abstract = "Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.",

keywords = "Consensus recommendations, Expert panel, Rectal MRI, Rectal cancer, White paper",

author = "Gollub, {Marc J.} and Supreeta Arya and Beets-Tan, {Regina Gh} and Gregory dePrisco and Mithat Gonen and Kartik Jhaveri and Zahra Kassam and Harmeet Kaur and David Kim and Andrea Knezevic and Elena Korngold and Chandana Lall and Neeraj Lalwani and {Blair Macdonald}, D. and Courtney Moreno and Stephanie Nougaret and Perry Pickhardt and Shannon Sheedy and Mukesh Harisinghani",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2018",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "2893--2902",

journal = "Abdominal Radiology",

issn = "2366-004X",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients

T2 - Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

AU - Gollub, Marc J.

AU - Arya, Supreeta

AU - Beets-Tan, Regina Gh

AU - dePrisco, Gregory

AU - Gonen, Mithat

AU - Jhaveri, Kartik

AU - Kassam, Zahra

AU - Kaur, Harmeet

AU - Kim, David

AU - Knezevic, Andrea

AU - Korngold, Elena

AU - Lall, Chandana

AU - Lalwani, Neeraj

AU - Blair Macdonald, D.

AU - Moreno, Courtney

AU - Nougaret, Stephanie

AU - Pickhardt, Perry

AU - Sheedy, Shannon

AU - Harisinghani, Mukesh

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

AB - Purpose: To propose guidelines based on an expert-panel-derived unified approach to the technical performance, interpretation, and reporting of MRI for baseline and post-treatment staging of rectal carcinoma. Methods: A consensus-based questionnaire adopted with permission and modified from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiologists was sent to a 17-member expert panel from the Rectal Cancer Disease-Focused Panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology containing 268 question parts. Consensus on an answer was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Answers not reaching consensus (< 70%) were noted. Results: Consensus was reached for 87% of items from which recommendations regarding patient preparation, technical performance, pulse sequence acquisition, and criteria for MRI assessment at initial staging and restaging exams and for MRI reporting were constructed. Conclusion: These expert consensus recommendations can be used as guidelines for primary and post-treatment staging of rectal cancer using MRI.

KW - Consensus recommendations

KW - Expert panel

KW - Rectal MRI

KW - Rectal cancer

KW - White paper

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047216685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047216685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

DO - 10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 29785540

AN - SCOPUS:85047216685

SN - 2366-004X

VL - 43

SP - 2893

EP - 2902

JO - Abdominal Radiology

JF - Abdominal Radiology

IS - 11

ER -

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this