TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of Evidence-Based Interventions and Implementation Strategies to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers
AU - Adams, Swann Arp
AU - Rohweder, Catherine L.
AU - Leeman, Jennifer
AU - Friedman, Daniela B.
AU - Gizlice, Ziya
AU - Vanderpool, Robin C.
AU - Askelson, Natoshia
AU - Best, Alicia
AU - Flocke, Susan A.
AU - Glanz, Karen
AU - Ko, Linda K.
AU - Kegler, Michelle
N1 - Funding Information:
One of the main goals of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) is to conduct dissemination and implementation (D&I) research that will facilitate cancer screening. CPCRN is a network of eight research sites across the U.S. funded by the CDC and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (http://www.cpcrn.org). A cross-CPCRN workgroup conducted this study to: (1) identify CRC screening EBIs that FQHCs are using, (2) explore implementation strategies that FQHCs are using to integrate those EBIs, (3) examine the relationship between EBIs, implementation strategies, and CRC screening rates, and (4) learn about the implementation supports (i.e. training and technical assistance) that FQHCs are accessing.
Funding Information:
Funding This research was conducted by the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network, which is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Research Centers and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). This research was supported by the following cooperative agreements from the CDC Prevention Research Centers and the NCI: 3 U48 DP005030-01S5, 3 U48 DP005021-01S4, 3 U48 DP005014-01S2, 3 U48 DP005053-01S1, 3 U48 DP005013-01S1A3, 3 U48 DP005000-01S2, 3 U48 DP005017-01S8.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been increasing in the general population, rates are considerably lower in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve a large proportion of uninsured and medically vulnerable patients. Efforts to screen eligible patients must be accelerated if we are to reach the national screening goal of 80% by 2018 and beyond. To inform this work, we conducted a survey of key informants at FQHCs in eight states to determine which evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote CRC screening are currently being used, and which implementation strategies are being employed to ensure that the interventions are executed as intended. One hundred and forty-eight FQHCs were invited to participate in the study, and 56 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 38%. Results demonstrated that provider reminder and recall systems were the most commonly used EBIs (44.6%) while the most commonly used implementation strategy was the identification of barriers (84.0%). The mean number of EBIs that were fully implemented at the centers was 2.4 (range 0–7) out of seven. Almost one-quarter of respondents indicated that their FQHCs were not using any EBIs to increase CRC screening. Full implementation of EBIs was correlated with higher CRC screening rates. These findings identify gaps as well as the preferences and needs of FQHCs in selecting and implementing EBIs for CRC screening.
AB - While colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have been increasing in the general population, rates are considerably lower in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which serve a large proportion of uninsured and medically vulnerable patients. Efforts to screen eligible patients must be accelerated if we are to reach the national screening goal of 80% by 2018 and beyond. To inform this work, we conducted a survey of key informants at FQHCs in eight states to determine which evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to promote CRC screening are currently being used, and which implementation strategies are being employed to ensure that the interventions are executed as intended. One hundred and forty-eight FQHCs were invited to participate in the study, and 56 completed surveys were received for a response rate of 38%. Results demonstrated that provider reminder and recall systems were the most commonly used EBIs (44.6%) while the most commonly used implementation strategy was the identification of barriers (84.0%). The mean number of EBIs that were fully implemented at the centers was 2.4 (range 0–7) out of seven. Almost one-quarter of respondents indicated that their FQHCs were not using any EBIs to increase CRC screening. Full implementation of EBIs was correlated with higher CRC screening rates. These findings identify gaps as well as the preferences and needs of FQHCs in selecting and implementing EBIs for CRC screening.
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Community health center
KW - Evidence-based interventions
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047115925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047115925&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2
DO - 10.1007/s10900-018-0520-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 29770945
AN - SCOPUS:85047115925
SN - 0094-5145
VL - 43
SP - 1044
EP - 1052
JO - Journal of Community Health
JF - Journal of Community Health
IS - 6
ER -