Use of computerized interview scheduling program for pediatric surgery match applicants

Caroline Q. Stephens, Nicholas Hamilton, Ann E. Thompson, Sanjay Krishnaswami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants and programs coordinate over 20 interviews per cycle. We hypothesized that replacing e-mail and phone communication with a computerized-scheduling program (CSP) could benefit both parties. Methods: We used a CSP to schedule 2016 interviews. Time to schedule and e-mail communication per applicant was compared to 2015, when traditional scheduling was used. Additionally, 2016 interviewees were surveyed about their experience with the CSP vs. traditional means. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and a Student's T-test. Results: We found a significant decrease in mean scheduling time from 14.4 to 1.7. h (p. <. 0.001) and in e-mails exchanged from 3.4 to 1.0 (p. <. 0.0001). Survey respondents reported 92% satisfaction with the CSP, and 87% found it easier to schedule interviews. Applicants also reported quicker finalization of interview dates (96%), improved access to interview slots (71%), and easier coordination of additional services and time off (63%). Notably, the mean longest time reported to schedule interviews using traditional methods was 7. days (range 1-30). Overall, 84% supported widespread adoption of CSPs. Conclusions: Using CSPs improved the scheduling process for the significant majority of interviewees, and our program. If widely adopted, this could greatly improve the efficiency of pediatric surgery interview scheduling. Level of evidence: N/A.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 7 2017

Fingerprint

Interviews
Pediatrics
Appointments and Schedules
Postal Service
Communication
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Fellowship
  • Interview
  • Match
  • Pediatric surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery

Cite this

Use of computerized interview scheduling program for pediatric surgery match applicants. / Stephens, Caroline Q.; Hamilton, Nicholas; Thompson, Ann E.; Krishnaswami, Sanjay.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 07.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{663c7b4883be4903a6adbc30b7a2f112,
title = "Use of computerized interview scheduling program for pediatric surgery match applicants",
abstract = "Background: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants and programs coordinate over 20 interviews per cycle. We hypothesized that replacing e-mail and phone communication with a computerized-scheduling program (CSP) could benefit both parties. Methods: We used a CSP to schedule 2016 interviews. Time to schedule and e-mail communication per applicant was compared to 2015, when traditional scheduling was used. Additionally, 2016 interviewees were surveyed about their experience with the CSP vs. traditional means. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and a Student's T-test. Results: We found a significant decrease in mean scheduling time from 14.4 to 1.7. h (p. <. 0.001) and in e-mails exchanged from 3.4 to 1.0 (p. <. 0.0001). Survey respondents reported 92{\%} satisfaction with the CSP, and 87{\%} found it easier to schedule interviews. Applicants also reported quicker finalization of interview dates (96{\%}), improved access to interview slots (71{\%}), and easier coordination of additional services and time off (63{\%}). Notably, the mean longest time reported to schedule interviews using traditional methods was 7. days (range 1-30). Overall, 84{\%} supported widespread adoption of CSPs. Conclusions: Using CSPs improved the scheduling process for the significant majority of interviewees, and our program. If widely adopted, this could greatly improve the efficiency of pediatric surgery interview scheduling. Level of evidence: N/A.",
keywords = "Cost, Fellowship, Interview, Match, Pediatric surgery",
author = "Stephens, {Caroline Q.} and Nicholas Hamilton and Thompson, {Ann E.} and Sanjay Krishnaswami",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.033",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of computerized interview scheduling program for pediatric surgery match applicants

AU - Stephens, Caroline Q.

AU - Hamilton, Nicholas

AU - Thompson, Ann E.

AU - Krishnaswami, Sanjay

PY - 2017/3/7

Y1 - 2017/3/7

N2 - Background: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants and programs coordinate over 20 interviews per cycle. We hypothesized that replacing e-mail and phone communication with a computerized-scheduling program (CSP) could benefit both parties. Methods: We used a CSP to schedule 2016 interviews. Time to schedule and e-mail communication per applicant was compared to 2015, when traditional scheduling was used. Additionally, 2016 interviewees were surveyed about their experience with the CSP vs. traditional means. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and a Student's T-test. Results: We found a significant decrease in mean scheduling time from 14.4 to 1.7. h (p. <. 0.001) and in e-mails exchanged from 3.4 to 1.0 (p. <. 0.0001). Survey respondents reported 92% satisfaction with the CSP, and 87% found it easier to schedule interviews. Applicants also reported quicker finalization of interview dates (96%), improved access to interview slots (71%), and easier coordination of additional services and time off (63%). Notably, the mean longest time reported to schedule interviews using traditional methods was 7. days (range 1-30). Overall, 84% supported widespread adoption of CSPs. Conclusions: Using CSPs improved the scheduling process for the significant majority of interviewees, and our program. If widely adopted, this could greatly improve the efficiency of pediatric surgery interview scheduling. Level of evidence: N/A.

AB - Background: Pediatric surgery fellowship applicants and programs coordinate over 20 interviews per cycle. We hypothesized that replacing e-mail and phone communication with a computerized-scheduling program (CSP) could benefit both parties. Methods: We used a CSP to schedule 2016 interviews. Time to schedule and e-mail communication per applicant was compared to 2015, when traditional scheduling was used. Additionally, 2016 interviewees were surveyed about their experience with the CSP vs. traditional means. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and a Student's T-test. Results: We found a significant decrease in mean scheduling time from 14.4 to 1.7. h (p. <. 0.001) and in e-mails exchanged from 3.4 to 1.0 (p. <. 0.0001). Survey respondents reported 92% satisfaction with the CSP, and 87% found it easier to schedule interviews. Applicants also reported quicker finalization of interview dates (96%), improved access to interview slots (71%), and easier coordination of additional services and time off (63%). Notably, the mean longest time reported to schedule interviews using traditional methods was 7. days (range 1-30). Overall, 84% supported widespread adoption of CSPs. Conclusions: Using CSPs improved the scheduling process for the significant majority of interviewees, and our program. If widely adopted, this could greatly improve the efficiency of pediatric surgery interview scheduling. Level of evidence: N/A.

KW - Cost

KW - Fellowship

KW - Interview

KW - Match

KW - Pediatric surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016011636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016011636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.033

M3 - Article

C2 - 28351518

AN - SCOPUS:85016011636

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

ER -