Use of advance directives for high-risk operations

A national survey of surgeons

Andrew J. Redmann, Karen Brasel, Caleb G. Alexander, Margaret L. Schwarze

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize surgeons' beliefs and approach to the use of an advance directive in the decision to perform high-risk operations. BACKGROUND: Prior work suggests many surgeons regard advance directives as antithetical to the goals of surgical therapy, yet little is known about surgeons' approach to high-risk operations for patients with directives limiting postoperative care. METHODS: We sent a self-administered survey by US mail to 2100 randomly selected vascular, neurologic, and cardiothoracic surgeons. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the relationship between explanatory variables and: (1) how often surgeons discuss advance directives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directives limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy influence the decision to operate. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 55%. All surgeons reported discussing the potential for unanticipated outcomes and nearly all (95%) discussed the need for postoperative life-supporting therapy. More than four-fifths (81%) reported discussing patient preferences to limit postoperative life-supporting therapy during informed consent. Approximately one half of respondents (52%) either sometimes or always discuss advance directives before surgery, with younger physicians less likely to do so than more experienced surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.06-0.85). More than one half (54%) of surgeons reported they would decline to operate on patients who have an advance directive limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgeons do not routinely discuss advanced directives preoperatively and more than one half reported they would decline to operate on patients whose directives limit postoperative care. This practice may limit the expression of patient preferences during decision making for high-risk operations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-423
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume255
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Advance Directives
Patient Preference
Postoperative Care
Therapeutics
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Postal Service
Informed Consent
Nervous System
Blood Vessels
Decision Making
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Use of advance directives for high-risk operations : A national survey of surgeons. / Redmann, Andrew J.; Brasel, Karen; Alexander, Caleb G.; Schwarze, Margaret L.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 255, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 418-423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Redmann, Andrew J. ; Brasel, Karen ; Alexander, Caleb G. ; Schwarze, Margaret L. / Use of advance directives for high-risk operations : A national survey of surgeons. In: Annals of Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 255, No. 3. pp. 418-423.
@article{e7d0c632945449219688412105017771,
title = "Use of advance directives for high-risk operations: A national survey of surgeons",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To characterize surgeons' beliefs and approach to the use of an advance directive in the decision to perform high-risk operations. BACKGROUND: Prior work suggests many surgeons regard advance directives as antithetical to the goals of surgical therapy, yet little is known about surgeons' approach to high-risk operations for patients with directives limiting postoperative care. METHODS: We sent a self-administered survey by US mail to 2100 randomly selected vascular, neurologic, and cardiothoracic surgeons. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the relationship between explanatory variables and: (1) how often surgeons discuss advance directives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directives limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy influence the decision to operate. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 55{\%}. All surgeons reported discussing the potential for unanticipated outcomes and nearly all (95{\%}) discussed the need for postoperative life-supporting therapy. More than four-fifths (81{\%}) reported discussing patient preferences to limit postoperative life-supporting therapy during informed consent. Approximately one half of respondents (52{\%}) either sometimes or always discuss advance directives before surgery, with younger physicians less likely to do so than more experienced surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95{\%} confidence intervals [CI] = 0.06-0.85). More than one half (54{\%}) of surgeons reported they would decline to operate on patients who have an advance directive limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgeons do not routinely discuss advanced directives preoperatively and more than one half reported they would decline to operate on patients whose directives limit postoperative care. This practice may limit the expression of patient preferences during decision making for high-risk operations.",
author = "Redmann, {Andrew J.} and Karen Brasel and Alexander, {Caleb G.} and Schwarze, {Margaret L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823b6782",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "255",
pages = "418--423",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of advance directives for high-risk operations

T2 - A national survey of surgeons

AU - Redmann, Andrew J.

AU - Brasel, Karen

AU - Alexander, Caleb G.

AU - Schwarze, Margaret L.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To characterize surgeons' beliefs and approach to the use of an advance directive in the decision to perform high-risk operations. BACKGROUND: Prior work suggests many surgeons regard advance directives as antithetical to the goals of surgical therapy, yet little is known about surgeons' approach to high-risk operations for patients with directives limiting postoperative care. METHODS: We sent a self-administered survey by US mail to 2100 randomly selected vascular, neurologic, and cardiothoracic surgeons. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the relationship between explanatory variables and: (1) how often surgeons discuss advance directives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directives limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy influence the decision to operate. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 55%. All surgeons reported discussing the potential for unanticipated outcomes and nearly all (95%) discussed the need for postoperative life-supporting therapy. More than four-fifths (81%) reported discussing patient preferences to limit postoperative life-supporting therapy during informed consent. Approximately one half of respondents (52%) either sometimes or always discuss advance directives before surgery, with younger physicians less likely to do so than more experienced surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.06-0.85). More than one half (54%) of surgeons reported they would decline to operate on patients who have an advance directive limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgeons do not routinely discuss advanced directives preoperatively and more than one half reported they would decline to operate on patients whose directives limit postoperative care. This practice may limit the expression of patient preferences during decision making for high-risk operations.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To characterize surgeons' beliefs and approach to the use of an advance directive in the decision to perform high-risk operations. BACKGROUND: Prior work suggests many surgeons regard advance directives as antithetical to the goals of surgical therapy, yet little is known about surgeons' approach to high-risk operations for patients with directives limiting postoperative care. METHODS: We sent a self-administered survey by US mail to 2100 randomly selected vascular, neurologic, and cardiothoracic surgeons. We used stepwise logistic regression to determine the relationship between explanatory variables and: (1) how often surgeons discuss advance directives preoperatively, and (2) how advance directives limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy influence the decision to operate. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 55%. All surgeons reported discussing the potential for unanticipated outcomes and nearly all (95%) discussed the need for postoperative life-supporting therapy. More than four-fifths (81%) reported discussing patient preferences to limit postoperative life-supporting therapy during informed consent. Approximately one half of respondents (52%) either sometimes or always discuss advance directives before surgery, with younger physicians less likely to do so than more experienced surgeons (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.06-0.85). More than one half (54%) of surgeons reported they would decline to operate on patients who have an advance directive limiting postoperative life-supporting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Many surgeons do not routinely discuss advanced directives preoperatively and more than one half reported they would decline to operate on patients whose directives limit postoperative care. This practice may limit the expression of patient preferences during decision making for high-risk operations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857647097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857647097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823b6782

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823b6782

M3 - Article

VL - 255

SP - 418

EP - 423

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 3

ER -