Use of a novel, electronic health record-centered, interprofessional ICU rounding simulation to understand latent safety issues

James Bordley, Knewton K. Sakata, Jesse Bierman, Karess McGrath, Ashley Mulanax, Linh Nguyen, Vishnu Mohan, Jeffrey (Jeff) Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making. Design: Each member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams. Conclusions: Although significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1570-1576
Number of pages7
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Safety
Pharmacists
Nurses
Optic Disk
Patient Safety
Aptitude
Decision Making
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Attending rounds
  • Communication
  • Critical care
  • Electronic health record
  • Intensive care unit
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Use of a novel, electronic health record-centered, interprofessional ICU rounding simulation to understand latent safety issues. / Bordley, James; Sakata, Knewton K.; Bierman, Jesse; McGrath, Karess; Mulanax, Ashley; Nguyen, Linh; Mohan, Vishnu; Gold, Jeffrey (Jeff).

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 46, No. 10, 01.01.2018, p. 1570-1576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bordley, James ; Sakata, Knewton K. ; Bierman, Jesse ; McGrath, Karess ; Mulanax, Ashley ; Nguyen, Linh ; Mohan, Vishnu ; Gold, Jeffrey (Jeff). / Use of a novel, electronic health record-centered, interprofessional ICU rounding simulation to understand latent safety issues. In: Critical care medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 46, No. 10. pp. 1570-1576.
@article{afa3d8c161e546e3baf0bb606c07bece,
title = "Use of a novel, electronic health record-centered, interprofessional ICU rounding simulation to understand latent safety issues",
abstract = "Objectives: The electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making. Design: Each member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight teams recognized 68.6{\%} of safety issues with only 50{\%} teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4{\%}, 15.6{\%}, and 19.6{\%} of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43{\%} being unique to a specific team and only 2{\%} placed by all teams. Conclusions: Although significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.",
keywords = "Attending rounds, Communication, Critical care, Electronic health record, Intensive care unit, Simulation",
author = "James Bordley and Sakata, {Knewton K.} and Jesse Bierman and Karess McGrath and Ashley Mulanax and Linh Nguyen and Vishnu Mohan and Gold, {Jeffrey (Jeff)}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1570--1576",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a novel, electronic health record-centered, interprofessional ICU rounding simulation to understand latent safety issues

AU - Bordley, James

AU - Sakata, Knewton K.

AU - Bierman, Jesse

AU - McGrath, Karess

AU - Mulanax, Ashley

AU - Nguyen, Linh

AU - Mohan, Vishnu

AU - Gold, Jeffrey (Jeff)

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making. Design: Each member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams. Conclusions: Although significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.

AB - Objectives: The electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making. Design: Each member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues. Setting: Academic medical center. Subjects: ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams. Conclusions: Although significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.

KW - Attending rounds

KW - Communication

KW - Critical care

KW - Electronic health record

KW - Intensive care unit

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064266103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064266103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003302

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064266103

VL - 46

SP - 1570

EP - 1576

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 10

ER -