Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 382-389 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Bulletin of the Medical Library Association |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - 1994 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Informatics
Cite this
Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting. / Hersh, William (Bill); Hickam, D.
In: Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1994, p. 382-389.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting
AU - Hersh, William (Bill)
AU - Hickam, D.
PY - 1994
Y1 - 1994
N2 - The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.
AB - The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027944630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027944630&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 7841907
AN - SCOPUS:0027944630
VL - 82
SP - 382
EP - 389
JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
SN - 1536-5050
IS - 4
ER -