Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-389
Number of pages8
JournalBulletin of the Medical Library Association
Volume82
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

workstation
Textbooks
MEDLINE
Librarians
Physicians
textbook
physician
general medicine
Medicine
source of information
librarian
literature
university
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting. / Hersh, William (Bill); Hickam, D.

In: Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 82, No. 4, 1994, p. 382-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{894c074d514745eca2af074756912171,
title = "Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting",
abstract = "The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.",
author = "Hersh, {William (Bill)} and D. Hickam",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "382--389",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting

AU - Hersh, William (Bill)

AU - Hickam, D.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.

AB - The goal of this study was to assess the usage frequency, user satisfaction, and quality of literature searches for a multi-application computer workstation in a university-based general medicine clinic. A computer with medical literature searching, textbook searching, and a decision-support program was deployed in the workroom of the clinic and made available for routine use. Data were collected for ten months. More than three quarters of the study participants used the computer, with use increasing by level of medical training. Despite physicians' known preferences for nonjournal sources of information, literature searching was the application used most frequently, followed by textbooks and decision support. The literature searches were replicated by experienced clinician and librarian searchers using first full MEDLINE and then text-word-only searching, to compare the quantities of relevant references retrieved. Novice searchers retrieved a larger number of relevant references than did the experienced searchers, but they also retrieved more nonrelevant references. For both groups of experienced searchers, the full MEDLINE feature set conferred little benefit over searching with only text words. These searching results call into question the value of traditional searching methods for both novice and experienced physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027944630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027944630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 382

EP - 389

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 4

ER -