Use caution when applying magnets to pacemakers or defibrillators for surgery

Peter Schulman, Marc A. Rozner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of a magnet to a pacemaker (intended to cause asynchronous pacing) or implanted cardioverter defibrillator (intended to prevent shocks) during surgery without a clear understanding of actual magnet function(s) or precautions can have unexpected, untoward, or harmful consequences. In this report, we present 3 cases in which inadequate assessment of cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) function, coupled with magnet application, contributed to or resulted in inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, CIED damage, or patient injury. Although these cases might be rare, they reinforce the need for a timely, detailed preoperative review of CIED function and programming as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-427
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume117
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Defibrillators
Magnets
Equipment and Supplies
Shock
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Use caution when applying magnets to pacemakers or defibrillators for surgery. / Schulman, Peter; Rozner, Marc A.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 117, No. 2, 08.2013, p. 422-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1751d2331a114b8193f9270e40f3fcec,
title = "Use caution when applying magnets to pacemakers or defibrillators for surgery",
abstract = "The application of a magnet to a pacemaker (intended to cause asynchronous pacing) or implanted cardioverter defibrillator (intended to prevent shocks) during surgery without a clear understanding of actual magnet function(s) or precautions can have unexpected, untoward, or harmful consequences. In this report, we present 3 cases in which inadequate assessment of cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) function, coupled with magnet application, contributed to or resulted in inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, CIED damage, or patient injury. Although these cases might be rare, they reinforce the need for a timely, detailed preoperative review of CIED function and programming as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society.",
author = "Peter Schulman and Rozner, {Marc A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829003a1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "422--427",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use caution when applying magnets to pacemakers or defibrillators for surgery

AU - Schulman, Peter

AU - Rozner, Marc A.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The application of a magnet to a pacemaker (intended to cause asynchronous pacing) or implanted cardioverter defibrillator (intended to prevent shocks) during surgery without a clear understanding of actual magnet function(s) or precautions can have unexpected, untoward, or harmful consequences. In this report, we present 3 cases in which inadequate assessment of cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) function, coupled with magnet application, contributed to or resulted in inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, CIED damage, or patient injury. Although these cases might be rare, they reinforce the need for a timely, detailed preoperative review of CIED function and programming as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society.

AB - The application of a magnet to a pacemaker (intended to cause asynchronous pacing) or implanted cardioverter defibrillator (intended to prevent shocks) during surgery without a clear understanding of actual magnet function(s) or precautions can have unexpected, untoward, or harmful consequences. In this report, we present 3 cases in which inadequate assessment of cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED) function, coupled with magnet application, contributed to or resulted in inappropriate antitachycardia pacing or shocks, CIED damage, or patient injury. Although these cases might be rare, they reinforce the need for a timely, detailed preoperative review of CIED function and programming as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881370046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881370046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829003a1

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829003a1

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 422

EP - 427

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 2

ER -