U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas

A descriptive study and system review

R. T. Gerhardt, T. Stewart, R. A. De Lorenzo, J. S. McGhee, E. J. Gourley, Martin Schreiber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Analysis of a high-volume military air ambulance unit and review of the U.S. Army air medical transport system and Military Assistance to Safety and Traffic (MAST) program. Setting: A remote medical system with numerous ground emergency medical services. Inclusion: All patients transported between January 1, 1996, and February 28, 1998. Exclusion: Patients who were dead on the scene or for whom records were unavailable. Methods: Retrospective review of transport and available inpatient records. Results: A total of 517 patients were transported during the study period; 461 patients met the inclusion criteria (89%). Of these, 70% were classified as trauma patients, and 30% had medical or other surgical diagnoses. Prehospital responses accounted for 71.6% of transports, and 28.4% were interhospitai transfers. Missions averaged 23.4 minutes per flight, with no major aircraft mishaps. Prehospital utilization review showed appropriate use; 35% of interhospital trauma missions and 11% of interhospital nontrauma missions were staffed inadequately by our criteria. Time intervals, procedures, and program impact are discussed. Conclusion: This and similar units participating in the MAST program provide effective air transport in settings underserved by civilian programs. Quality and wartime readiness could be improved by centralized medical direction, treatment and transfer protocols, and enhanced training of medics. Further investigations of the clinical impact of advanced training and a two-medic aircrew model are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)102-107
Number of pages6
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume166
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Air Ambulances
Air
Utilization Review
Safety
Aircraft
Wounds and Injuries
Emergency Medical Services
Clinical Protocols
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Gerhardt, R. T., Stewart, T., De Lorenzo, R. A., McGhee, J. S., Gourley, E. J., & Schreiber, M. (2001). U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas: A descriptive study and system review. Military Medicine, 166(2), 102-107.

U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas : A descriptive study and system review. / Gerhardt, R. T.; Stewart, T.; De Lorenzo, R. A.; McGhee, J. S.; Gourley, E. J.; Schreiber, Martin.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 166, No. 2, 2001, p. 102-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gerhardt, RT, Stewart, T, De Lorenzo, RA, McGhee, JS, Gourley, EJ & Schreiber, M 2001, 'U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas: A descriptive study and system review', Military Medicine, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 102-107.
Gerhardt RT, Stewart T, De Lorenzo RA, McGhee JS, Gourley EJ, Schreiber M. U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas: A descriptive study and system review. Military Medicine. 2001;166(2):102-107.
Gerhardt, R. T. ; Stewart, T. ; De Lorenzo, R. A. ; McGhee, J. S. ; Gourley, E. J. ; Schreiber, Martin. / U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas : A descriptive study and system review. In: Military Medicine. 2001 ; Vol. 166, No. 2. pp. 102-107.
@article{e1ddde7ae7ee4ec2b440bc3b03af02c6,
title = "U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas: A descriptive study and system review",
abstract = "Objective: Analysis of a high-volume military air ambulance unit and review of the U.S. Army air medical transport system and Military Assistance to Safety and Traffic (MAST) program. Setting: A remote medical system with numerous ground emergency medical services. Inclusion: All patients transported between January 1, 1996, and February 28, 1998. Exclusion: Patients who were dead on the scene or for whom records were unavailable. Methods: Retrospective review of transport and available inpatient records. Results: A total of 517 patients were transported during the study period; 461 patients met the inclusion criteria (89{\%}). Of these, 70{\%} were classified as trauma patients, and 30{\%} had medical or other surgical diagnoses. Prehospital responses accounted for 71.6{\%} of transports, and 28.4{\%} were interhospitai transfers. Missions averaged 23.4 minutes per flight, with no major aircraft mishaps. Prehospital utilization review showed appropriate use; 35{\%} of interhospital trauma missions and 11{\%} of interhospital nontrauma missions were staffed inadequately by our criteria. Time intervals, procedures, and program impact are discussed. Conclusion: This and similar units participating in the MAST program provide effective air transport in settings underserved by civilian programs. Quality and wartime readiness could be improved by centralized medical direction, treatment and transfer protocols, and enhanced training of medics. Further investigations of the clinical impact of advanced training and a two-medic aircrew model are warranted.",
author = "Gerhardt, {R. T.} and T. Stewart and {De Lorenzo}, {R. A.} and McGhee, {J. S.} and Gourley, {E. J.} and Martin Schreiber",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "166",
pages = "102--107",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - U.S. Army air ambulance operations in El Paso, Texas

T2 - A descriptive study and system review

AU - Gerhardt, R. T.

AU - Stewart, T.

AU - De Lorenzo, R. A.

AU - McGhee, J. S.

AU - Gourley, E. J.

AU - Schreiber, Martin

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Objective: Analysis of a high-volume military air ambulance unit and review of the U.S. Army air medical transport system and Military Assistance to Safety and Traffic (MAST) program. Setting: A remote medical system with numerous ground emergency medical services. Inclusion: All patients transported between January 1, 1996, and February 28, 1998. Exclusion: Patients who were dead on the scene or for whom records were unavailable. Methods: Retrospective review of transport and available inpatient records. Results: A total of 517 patients were transported during the study period; 461 patients met the inclusion criteria (89%). Of these, 70% were classified as trauma patients, and 30% had medical or other surgical diagnoses. Prehospital responses accounted for 71.6% of transports, and 28.4% were interhospitai transfers. Missions averaged 23.4 minutes per flight, with no major aircraft mishaps. Prehospital utilization review showed appropriate use; 35% of interhospital trauma missions and 11% of interhospital nontrauma missions were staffed inadequately by our criteria. Time intervals, procedures, and program impact are discussed. Conclusion: This and similar units participating in the MAST program provide effective air transport in settings underserved by civilian programs. Quality and wartime readiness could be improved by centralized medical direction, treatment and transfer protocols, and enhanced training of medics. Further investigations of the clinical impact of advanced training and a two-medic aircrew model are warranted.

AB - Objective: Analysis of a high-volume military air ambulance unit and review of the U.S. Army air medical transport system and Military Assistance to Safety and Traffic (MAST) program. Setting: A remote medical system with numerous ground emergency medical services. Inclusion: All patients transported between January 1, 1996, and February 28, 1998. Exclusion: Patients who were dead on the scene or for whom records were unavailable. Methods: Retrospective review of transport and available inpatient records. Results: A total of 517 patients were transported during the study period; 461 patients met the inclusion criteria (89%). Of these, 70% were classified as trauma patients, and 30% had medical or other surgical diagnoses. Prehospital responses accounted for 71.6% of transports, and 28.4% were interhospitai transfers. Missions averaged 23.4 minutes per flight, with no major aircraft mishaps. Prehospital utilization review showed appropriate use; 35% of interhospital trauma missions and 11% of interhospital nontrauma missions were staffed inadequately by our criteria. Time intervals, procedures, and program impact are discussed. Conclusion: This and similar units participating in the MAST program provide effective air transport in settings underserved by civilian programs. Quality and wartime readiness could be improved by centralized medical direction, treatment and transfer protocols, and enhanced training of medics. Further investigations of the clinical impact of advanced training and a two-medic aircrew model are warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035116585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035116585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 166

SP - 102

EP - 107

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

IS - 2

ER -