TY - JOUR
T1 - Updates in histologic grading of urologic neoplasms
AU - Rice-Stitt, Travis
AU - Valencia-Guerrero, Aida
AU - Cornejo, Kristine M.
AU - Wu, Chin Lee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Context.-Tumor histology offers a composite view of the genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, and microenvironmental determinants of tumor biology. As a marker of tumor histology, histologic grading has persisted as a highly relevant factor in risk stratification and management of urologic neoplasms (ie, renal cell carcinoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma). Ongoing research and consensus meetings have attempted to improve the accuracy, consistency, and biologic relevance of histologic grading, as well as provide guidance for many challenging scenarios. Objective.-To review the most recent updates to the grading system of urologic neoplasms, including those in the 2016 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Bluebook, with emphasis on issues encountered in routine practice. Data Sources.-Peer-reviewed publications and the 4th edition of the WHO Bluebook on the pathology and genetics of the urinary system and male genital organs. Conclusions.-This article summarizes the recently updated grading schemes for renal cell carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinomas, and bladder neoplasms of the genitourinary tract.
AB - Context.-Tumor histology offers a composite view of the genetic, epigenetic, proteomic, and microenvironmental determinants of tumor biology. As a marker of tumor histology, histologic grading has persisted as a highly relevant factor in risk stratification and management of urologic neoplasms (ie, renal cell carcinoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma). Ongoing research and consensus meetings have attempted to improve the accuracy, consistency, and biologic relevance of histologic grading, as well as provide guidance for many challenging scenarios. Objective.-To review the most recent updates to the grading system of urologic neoplasms, including those in the 2016 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Bluebook, with emphasis on issues encountered in routine practice. Data Sources.-Peer-reviewed publications and the 4th edition of the WHO Bluebook on the pathology and genetics of the urinary system and male genital organs. Conclusions.-This article summarizes the recently updated grading schemes for renal cell carcinoma, prostate adenocarcinomas, and bladder neoplasms of the genitourinary tract.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081163399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081163399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2019-0551-RA
DO - 10.5858/arpa.2019-0551-RA
M3 - Article
C2 - 32101058
AN - SCOPUS:85081163399
SN - 0003-9985
VL - 144
SP - 335
EP - 343
JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
IS - 3
ER -