Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors: Attention to the principles of exercise training

Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko, Kerri Winters-Stone, Kelcey A. Bland, Kristin L. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion: No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 20 2017

Fingerprint

Survivors
Exercise
Breast Neoplasms
Prescriptions
Randomized Controlled Trials
Physical Fitness
Information Storage and Retrieval
Body Composition
Research
Databases

Keywords

  • breast
  • cancer
  • exercise training
  • methodology
  • review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors : Attention to the principles of exercise training. / Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.; Winters-Stone, Kerri; Bland, Kelcey A.; Campbell, Kristin L.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, 20.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c86bcba81b94e77a992330c55642938,
title = "Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors: Attention to the principles of exercise training",
abstract = "Objectives: To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 84{\%}, progression by 29{\%}, overload by 38{\%} and initial values by 67{\%} of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3{\%} anddiminishing returns by 22{\%} of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion: No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.",
keywords = "breast, cancer, exercise training, methodology, review",
author = "Neil-Sztramko, {Sarah E.} and Kerri Winters-Stone and Bland, {Kelcey A.} and Campbell, {Kristin L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2017-098389",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors

T2 - Attention to the principles of exercise training

AU - Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.

AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri

AU - Bland, Kelcey A.

AU - Campbell, Kristin L.

PY - 2017/11/20

Y1 - 2017/11/20

N2 - Objectives: To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion: No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.

AB - Objectives: To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results: Specificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion: No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.

KW - breast

KW - cancer

KW - exercise training

KW - methodology

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042331474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042331474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098389

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098389

M3 - Article

C2 - 29162619

AN - SCOPUS:85042331474

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

ER -