Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies

Eva Compérat, André Oszwald, Gabriel Wasinger, Donna E. Hansel, Rodolfo Montironi, Theodorus van der Kwast, Johannes A. Witjes, Mahul B. Amin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim: Optimal management of bladder cancer requires an accurate, standardised and timely pathological diagnosis, and close communication between surgeons and pathologists. Here, we provide an update on pathology reporting standards of transurethral resections of the bladder and cystectomies. Methods: We reviewed recent literature, focusing on developments between 2013 and 2021. Results: Published reporting standards developed by pathology organizations have improved diagnosis and treatment. Tumor sub-staging and subtyping has gained increased attention. Lymph nodes continue to be an area of debate, and their staging has seen minor modifications. Several tasks, particularly regarding specimen preparation (“grossing”), are not yet standardized and offer opportunity for improvement. Molecular classification is rapidly evolving, but currently has only limited impact on management. Conclusion: Pathological reporting of bladder cancer is continuously evolving and remains challenging in some areas. This review provides an overview of recent major developments, with a particular focus on published reporting standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWorld Journal of Urology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • Pathology
  • Reporting
  • Staging
  • TURB

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this