Update on major reconstruction of the head and neck

Mark Wax, Jason Kim, Yadranko Ducic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the head and neck is best accomplished using similar composite tissue. In the head and neck, this tissue is usually available in the form of adjacent tissue transfer. The local adjacent tissue resembles the resected tissue in color and composition. In some circumstances, the local tissue is not suitable for transfer. This may be due to previous surgery, exposure to radiation, or a defect that is too large for local tissue transfer. In these cases, free tissue transfer may be needed. Free tissue transfer allows for the replacement of similar composite tissue that has not seen previous treatment. The diversity of sites that may be harvested allows a relatively similar tissue match. This article discusses recent advances in the reconstruction of 3 areas that in the past have presented many problems to the reconstructive surgeon. Total nasal and lip reconstruction have been problematic. In heavily pretreated patients, the reconstruction often results in suboptimal outcomes. Large scalp defects in the setting of previous excisions or irradiation are difficult to reconstruct and rehabilitate. In all of these cases, the ability to transfer composite tissue has improved the functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)392-399
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Facial Plastic Surgery
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Neck
Head
Lip
Scalp
Nose
Cosmetics
Color

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Update on major reconstruction of the head and neck. / Wax, Mark; Kim, Jason; Ducic, Yadranko.

In: Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, Vol. 9, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 392-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wax, Mark ; Kim, Jason ; Ducic, Yadranko. / Update on major reconstruction of the head and neck. In: Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 392-399.
@article{5b4edbeb6a4c4a4eac74ec07ae7b1980,
title = "Update on major reconstruction of the head and neck",
abstract = "Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the head and neck is best accomplished using similar composite tissue. In the head and neck, this tissue is usually available in the form of adjacent tissue transfer. The local adjacent tissue resembles the resected tissue in color and composition. In some circumstances, the local tissue is not suitable for transfer. This may be due to previous surgery, exposure to radiation, or a defect that is too large for local tissue transfer. In these cases, free tissue transfer may be needed. Free tissue transfer allows for the replacement of similar composite tissue that has not seen previous treatment. The diversity of sites that may be harvested allows a relatively similar tissue match. This article discusses recent advances in the reconstruction of 3 areas that in the past have presented many problems to the reconstructive surgeon. Total nasal and lip reconstruction have been problematic. In heavily pretreated patients, the reconstruction often results in suboptimal outcomes. Large scalp defects in the setting of previous excisions or irradiation are difficult to reconstruct and rehabilitate. In all of these cases, the ability to transfer composite tissue has improved the functional and cosmetic outcomes.",
author = "Mark Wax and Jason Kim and Yadranko Ducic",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1001/archfaci.9.6.392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "392--399",
journal = "JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery",
issn = "2168-6076",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Update on major reconstruction of the head and neck

AU - Wax, Mark

AU - Kim, Jason

AU - Ducic, Yadranko

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the head and neck is best accomplished using similar composite tissue. In the head and neck, this tissue is usually available in the form of adjacent tissue transfer. The local adjacent tissue resembles the resected tissue in color and composition. In some circumstances, the local tissue is not suitable for transfer. This may be due to previous surgery, exposure to radiation, or a defect that is too large for local tissue transfer. In these cases, free tissue transfer may be needed. Free tissue transfer allows for the replacement of similar composite tissue that has not seen previous treatment. The diversity of sites that may be harvested allows a relatively similar tissue match. This article discusses recent advances in the reconstruction of 3 areas that in the past have presented many problems to the reconstructive surgeon. Total nasal and lip reconstruction have been problematic. In heavily pretreated patients, the reconstruction often results in suboptimal outcomes. Large scalp defects in the setting of previous excisions or irradiation are difficult to reconstruct and rehabilitate. In all of these cases, the ability to transfer composite tissue has improved the functional and cosmetic outcomes.

AB - Reconstruction of soft-tissue defects in the head and neck is best accomplished using similar composite tissue. In the head and neck, this tissue is usually available in the form of adjacent tissue transfer. The local adjacent tissue resembles the resected tissue in color and composition. In some circumstances, the local tissue is not suitable for transfer. This may be due to previous surgery, exposure to radiation, or a defect that is too large for local tissue transfer. In these cases, free tissue transfer may be needed. Free tissue transfer allows for the replacement of similar composite tissue that has not seen previous treatment. The diversity of sites that may be harvested allows a relatively similar tissue match. This article discusses recent advances in the reconstruction of 3 areas that in the past have presented many problems to the reconstructive surgeon. Total nasal and lip reconstruction have been problematic. In heavily pretreated patients, the reconstruction often results in suboptimal outcomes. Large scalp defects in the setting of previous excisions or irradiation are difficult to reconstruct and rehabilitate. In all of these cases, the ability to transfer composite tissue has improved the functional and cosmetic outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36849064432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36849064432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archfaci.9.6.392

DO - 10.1001/archfaci.9.6.392

M3 - Article

C2 - 18025349

AN - SCOPUS:36849064432

VL - 9

SP - 392

EP - 399

JO - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

JF - JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

SN - 2168-6076

IS - 6

ER -