Unilateral and bilateral surgery for parathyroid disease

Neil D. Gross, Mark Wax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The goal of parathyroid surgery, extirpation of all disease with the least possible patient morbidity, is the same regardless of the approach. According to this aim, it may be difficult for the neophyte surgeon to determine which approach is most appropriate. Bilateral exploration offers the potential of identifying and removing all disease with a single operation, whereas unilateral surgery carries the promise of decreased morbidity. Unfortunately, a cursory review of the literature is not as helpful as one would expect. The sheer volume of studies on parathyroid surgery can prove to be an insurmountable review task for any active clinician: the PubMed National Library of Medicine (available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez) has 2347 citations between 1993 and 2003. Further, numerous contradictory reports fail to define accurately the nuances of clinical management. In the end, the choice of technique may have more to do with surgeon preference and experience than with science. As Edward D. Churchill stated in 1931, "The success of parathyroid surgery must lie in the ability of the surgeon to know a parathyroid gland when he sees it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)799-817
Number of pages19
JournalOtolaryngologic Clinics of North America
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004

Fingerprint

Parathyroid Diseases
National Library of Medicine (U.S.)
Morbidity
Parathyroid Glands
PubMed
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Unilateral and bilateral surgery for parathyroid disease. / Gross, Neil D.; Wax, Mark.

In: Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 37, No. 4, 08.2004, p. 799-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a1beb959d4842939b949f275077eb9f,
title = "Unilateral and bilateral surgery for parathyroid disease",
abstract = "The goal of parathyroid surgery, extirpation of all disease with the least possible patient morbidity, is the same regardless of the approach. According to this aim, it may be difficult for the neophyte surgeon to determine which approach is most appropriate. Bilateral exploration offers the potential of identifying and removing all disease with a single operation, whereas unilateral surgery carries the promise of decreased morbidity. Unfortunately, a cursory review of the literature is not as helpful as one would expect. The sheer volume of studies on parathyroid surgery can prove to be an insurmountable review task for any active clinician: the PubMed National Library of Medicine (available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez) has 2347 citations between 1993 and 2003. Further, numerous contradictory reports fail to define accurately the nuances of clinical management. In the end, the choice of technique may have more to do with surgeon preference and experience than with science. As Edward D. Churchill stated in 1931, {"}The success of parathyroid surgery must lie in the ability of the surgeon to know a parathyroid gland when he sees it.",
author = "Gross, {Neil D.} and Mark Wax",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.otc.2004.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "799--817",
journal = "Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America",
issn = "0030-6665",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unilateral and bilateral surgery for parathyroid disease

AU - Gross, Neil D.

AU - Wax, Mark

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - The goal of parathyroid surgery, extirpation of all disease with the least possible patient morbidity, is the same regardless of the approach. According to this aim, it may be difficult for the neophyte surgeon to determine which approach is most appropriate. Bilateral exploration offers the potential of identifying and removing all disease with a single operation, whereas unilateral surgery carries the promise of decreased morbidity. Unfortunately, a cursory review of the literature is not as helpful as one would expect. The sheer volume of studies on parathyroid surgery can prove to be an insurmountable review task for any active clinician: the PubMed National Library of Medicine (available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez) has 2347 citations between 1993 and 2003. Further, numerous contradictory reports fail to define accurately the nuances of clinical management. In the end, the choice of technique may have more to do with surgeon preference and experience than with science. As Edward D. Churchill stated in 1931, "The success of parathyroid surgery must lie in the ability of the surgeon to know a parathyroid gland when he sees it.

AB - The goal of parathyroid surgery, extirpation of all disease with the least possible patient morbidity, is the same regardless of the approach. According to this aim, it may be difficult for the neophyte surgeon to determine which approach is most appropriate. Bilateral exploration offers the potential of identifying and removing all disease with a single operation, whereas unilateral surgery carries the promise of decreased morbidity. Unfortunately, a cursory review of the literature is not as helpful as one would expect. The sheer volume of studies on parathyroid surgery can prove to be an insurmountable review task for any active clinician: the PubMed National Library of Medicine (available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez) has 2347 citations between 1993 and 2003. Further, numerous contradictory reports fail to define accurately the nuances of clinical management. In the end, the choice of technique may have more to do with surgeon preference and experience than with science. As Edward D. Churchill stated in 1931, "The success of parathyroid surgery must lie in the ability of the surgeon to know a parathyroid gland when he sees it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242725070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242725070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otc.2004.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.otc.2004.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 15262517

AN - SCOPUS:3242725070

VL - 37

SP - 799

EP - 817

JO - Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

JF - Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

SN - 0030-6665

IS - 4

ER -