Understanding ageing

Further commentary on the limitations of cross-sectional designs for ageing research

Scott Hofer, Martin J. Sliwinski, Brian P. Flaherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical issues regarding the utility of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional samples for estimating associations among rates of change are briefly reviewed and further examined in response to the four insightful commentaries on our original discussion paper. These general issues are considered in terms of current practice in gerontological studies. Several of the commentaries refer to additional problems (e.g., selection/attrition, cohort differences) with cross-sectional designs for inferring correlated rates of change, often modeled as shared age-related variance. The commentators concurred with, and performed simulations that support, our primary contention that the influence of mean population trends over time has a major confounding influence on cross-sectional estimates of association. While this confound has been acknowledged and demonstrated in a number of publications over this century, cross-sectional studies and covariance modeling remain common practice in gerontological studies. We question the value of this practice for advancing aging theory and would like to see greater emphasis placed on longitudinal studies and the use of cross-sectional designs and analytic methods that permit separation of age-related mean trends from estimates of association between age-related variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-29
Number of pages8
JournalGerontology
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Longitudinal Studies
Publications
Research Design
Cross-Sectional Studies
Population

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Cognition
  • Methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

Understanding ageing : Further commentary on the limitations of cross-sectional designs for ageing research. / Hofer, Scott; Sliwinski, Martin J.; Flaherty, Brian P.

In: Gerontology, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2002, p. 22-29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hofer, Scott ; Sliwinski, Martin J. ; Flaherty, Brian P. / Understanding ageing : Further commentary on the limitations of cross-sectional designs for ageing research. In: Gerontology. 2002 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 22-29.
@article{1f40ad6c71404df095c88f70d8a50dc5,
title = "Understanding ageing: Further commentary on the limitations of cross-sectional designs for ageing research",
abstract = "Critical issues regarding the utility of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional samples for estimating associations among rates of change are briefly reviewed and further examined in response to the four insightful commentaries on our original discussion paper. These general issues are considered in terms of current practice in gerontological studies. Several of the commentaries refer to additional problems (e.g., selection/attrition, cohort differences) with cross-sectional designs for inferring correlated rates of change, often modeled as shared age-related variance. The commentators concurred with, and performed simulations that support, our primary contention that the influence of mean population trends over time has a major confounding influence on cross-sectional estimates of association. While this confound has been acknowledged and demonstrated in a number of publications over this century, cross-sectional studies and covariance modeling remain common practice in gerontological studies. We question the value of this practice for advancing aging theory and would like to see greater emphasis placed on longitudinal studies and the use of cross-sectional designs and analytic methods that permit separation of age-related mean trends from estimates of association between age-related variables.",
keywords = "Ageing, Cognition, Methodology",
author = "Scott Hofer and Sliwinski, {Martin J.} and Flaherty, {Brian P.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1159/000048920",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "22--29",
journal = "Gerontology",
issn = "0304-324X",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding ageing

T2 - Further commentary on the limitations of cross-sectional designs for ageing research

AU - Hofer, Scott

AU - Sliwinski, Martin J.

AU - Flaherty, Brian P.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Critical issues regarding the utility of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional samples for estimating associations among rates of change are briefly reviewed and further examined in response to the four insightful commentaries on our original discussion paper. These general issues are considered in terms of current practice in gerontological studies. Several of the commentaries refer to additional problems (e.g., selection/attrition, cohort differences) with cross-sectional designs for inferring correlated rates of change, often modeled as shared age-related variance. The commentators concurred with, and performed simulations that support, our primary contention that the influence of mean population trends over time has a major confounding influence on cross-sectional estimates of association. While this confound has been acknowledged and demonstrated in a number of publications over this century, cross-sectional studies and covariance modeling remain common practice in gerontological studies. We question the value of this practice for advancing aging theory and would like to see greater emphasis placed on longitudinal studies and the use of cross-sectional designs and analytic methods that permit separation of age-related mean trends from estimates of association between age-related variables.

AB - Critical issues regarding the utility of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional samples for estimating associations among rates of change are briefly reviewed and further examined in response to the four insightful commentaries on our original discussion paper. These general issues are considered in terms of current practice in gerontological studies. Several of the commentaries refer to additional problems (e.g., selection/attrition, cohort differences) with cross-sectional designs for inferring correlated rates of change, often modeled as shared age-related variance. The commentators concurred with, and performed simulations that support, our primary contention that the influence of mean population trends over time has a major confounding influence on cross-sectional estimates of association. While this confound has been acknowledged and demonstrated in a number of publications over this century, cross-sectional studies and covariance modeling remain common practice in gerontological studies. We question the value of this practice for advancing aging theory and would like to see greater emphasis placed on longitudinal studies and the use of cross-sectional designs and analytic methods that permit separation of age-related mean trends from estimates of association between age-related variables.

KW - Ageing

KW - Cognition

KW - Methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036178141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036178141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000048920

DO - 10.1159/000048920

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 22

EP - 29

JO - Gerontology

JF - Gerontology

SN - 0304-324X

IS - 1

ER -