Uncovering frustrations

A qualitative needs assessment of academic general internists as geriatric care providers and teachers

Craig Tanner, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Sima Desai, Carol L. Joseph, Marnie R. Ririe, Judith Bowen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General internists commonly provide medical care for older adults and geriatric education to trainees, but lack the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfill these tasks. OBJECTIVE: Assess the geriatric training needs of academic general internists in 3 hospital systems in Portland, OR. DESIGN: Ten focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, a well-recognized qualitative technique. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 22 academic general internists and 8 geriatricians from 3 different teaching hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: We elicited stories of frustration and success in caring for elderly patients and in teaching about their care. We asked geriatricians to recount their experiences as consultants to general internists and to comment on the training of Internists in geriatrics. RESULTS: In addition to deficits in their medical knowledge and skills, our Internists reported frustration with the process of delivering care to older adults. In particular, they felt ill prepared to guide care transitions for patients, use multidisciplinary teams effectively, and were frustrated with health care system issues. Additionally, general internists' approach to medical care, which largely relies on the medical model, is different from that of geriatricians, which focuses more on social and functional issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings may not be broadly representative, improving our general internists' abilities to care for the elderly and to teach learners how to do the same should address deficits in medical knowledge and skills, barriers to the processes of delivering care, and philosophical approaches to care. Prioritizing and quantifying these needs and measuring the effectiveness of curricula to address them are areas for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-55
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Frustration
Needs Assessment
Geriatrics
Teaching
Interviews
Patient Transfer
Aptitude
Consultants
Focus Groups
Teaching Hospitals
Curriculum
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Geriatricians

Keywords

  • Curriculum development
  • Faculty development
  • General internal medicine
  • Geriatrics
  • Medical education
  • Qualitative methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Uncovering frustrations : A qualitative needs assessment of academic general internists as geriatric care providers and teachers. / Tanner, Craig; Eckstrom, Elizabeth; Desai, Sima; Joseph, Carol L.; Ririe, Marnie R.; Bowen, Judith.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 51-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d891b5fc94e940f0bb47e5ed47896eb1,
title = "Uncovering frustrations: A qualitative needs assessment of academic general internists as geriatric care providers and teachers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: General internists commonly provide medical care for older adults and geriatric education to trainees, but lack the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfill these tasks. OBJECTIVE: Assess the geriatric training needs of academic general internists in 3 hospital systems in Portland, OR. DESIGN: Ten focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, a well-recognized qualitative technique. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 22 academic general internists and 8 geriatricians from 3 different teaching hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: We elicited stories of frustration and success in caring for elderly patients and in teaching about their care. We asked geriatricians to recount their experiences as consultants to general internists and to comment on the training of Internists in geriatrics. RESULTS: In addition to deficits in their medical knowledge and skills, our Internists reported frustration with the process of delivering care to older adults. In particular, they felt ill prepared to guide care transitions for patients, use multidisciplinary teams effectively, and were frustrated with health care system issues. Additionally, general internists' approach to medical care, which largely relies on the medical model, is different from that of geriatricians, which focuses more on social and functional issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings may not be broadly representative, improving our general internists' abilities to care for the elderly and to teach learners how to do the same should address deficits in medical knowledge and skills, barriers to the processes of delivering care, and philosophical approaches to care. Prioritizing and quantifying these needs and measuring the effectiveness of curricula to address them are areas for future research.",
keywords = "Curriculum development, Faculty development, General internal medicine, Geriatrics, Medical education, Qualitative methods",
author = "Craig Tanner and Elizabeth Eckstrom and Sima Desai and Joseph, {Carol L.} and Ririe, {Marnie R.} and Judith Bowen",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0281.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "51--55",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncovering frustrations

T2 - A qualitative needs assessment of academic general internists as geriatric care providers and teachers

AU - Tanner, Craig

AU - Eckstrom, Elizabeth

AU - Desai, Sima

AU - Joseph, Carol L.

AU - Ririe, Marnie R.

AU - Bowen, Judith

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: General internists commonly provide medical care for older adults and geriatric education to trainees, but lack the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfill these tasks. OBJECTIVE: Assess the geriatric training needs of academic general internists in 3 hospital systems in Portland, OR. DESIGN: Ten focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, a well-recognized qualitative technique. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 22 academic general internists and 8 geriatricians from 3 different teaching hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: We elicited stories of frustration and success in caring for elderly patients and in teaching about their care. We asked geriatricians to recount their experiences as consultants to general internists and to comment on the training of Internists in geriatrics. RESULTS: In addition to deficits in their medical knowledge and skills, our Internists reported frustration with the process of delivering care to older adults. In particular, they felt ill prepared to guide care transitions for patients, use multidisciplinary teams effectively, and were frustrated with health care system issues. Additionally, general internists' approach to medical care, which largely relies on the medical model, is different from that of geriatricians, which focuses more on social and functional issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings may not be broadly representative, improving our general internists' abilities to care for the elderly and to teach learners how to do the same should address deficits in medical knowledge and skills, barriers to the processes of delivering care, and philosophical approaches to care. Prioritizing and quantifying these needs and measuring the effectiveness of curricula to address them are areas for future research.

AB - BACKGROUND: General internists commonly provide medical care for older adults and geriatric education to trainees, but lack the necessary knowledge and skills to fulfill these tasks. OBJECTIVE: Assess the geriatric training needs of academic general internists in 3 hospital systems in Portland, OR. DESIGN: Ten focus groups and 1 semi-structured interview. Interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, a well-recognized qualitative technique. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 22 academic general internists and 8 geriatricians from 3 different teaching hospitals. MEASUREMENTS: We elicited stories of frustration and success in caring for elderly patients and in teaching about their care. We asked geriatricians to recount their experiences as consultants to general internists and to comment on the training of Internists in geriatrics. RESULTS: In addition to deficits in their medical knowledge and skills, our Internists reported frustration with the process of delivering care to older adults. In particular, they felt ill prepared to guide care transitions for patients, use multidisciplinary teams effectively, and were frustrated with health care system issues. Additionally, general internists' approach to medical care, which largely relies on the medical model, is different from that of geriatricians, which focuses more on social and functional issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although our findings may not be broadly representative, improving our general internists' abilities to care for the elderly and to teach learners how to do the same should address deficits in medical knowledge and skills, barriers to the processes of delivering care, and philosophical approaches to care. Prioritizing and quantifying these needs and measuring the effectiveness of curricula to address them are areas for future research.

KW - Curriculum development

KW - Faculty development

KW - General internal medicine

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Medical education

KW - Qualitative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645123420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645123420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0281.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0281.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 51

EP - 55

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 1

ER -