TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasound-guided blocks for cardiovascular surgery
T2 - Which block for which patient?
AU - Smith, Lauren M.
AU - Barrington, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was supported by the Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Purpose of reviewRegional anesthesia blocks may benefit patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. This review coincides with the evolution of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, societal concerns regarding opioid misuse and changing expectations regarding surgical recovery.Recent findingsParavertebral block and thoracic epidural analgesia have comparable postoperative analgesic profiles following thoracotomy; however, the former has a more favorable complication profile. Limited trials have compared these modalities in cardiac surgery. The mechanism of action of continuous paravertebral blockade may be systemic. Bilateral continuous paravertebral (and other continuous peripheral nerve blocks) should be used with caution in adult patients having cardiac surgery because of the risk of systemic local anesthetic toxicity and bleeding. Novel ultrasound-guided blocks: Erector spinae, serratus anterior, pectoral, transversus thoracic muscle and pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks potentially reduce postoperative opioid requirements; however, they require further investigation before their routine use can be recommended in adult cardiovascular surgical practice. The mechanism of action of erector spinae block is not fully elucidated.SummaryUltrasound-guided fascial plane blocks may reduce postoperative opioid requirements. Investigation into the safety and efficacy of bilateral continuous ultrasound-guided blockade for cardiac surgery is required. Trial protocols should be embedded into enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Patient-reported and long-term outcomes are recommended.
AB - Purpose of reviewRegional anesthesia blocks may benefit patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. This review coincides with the evolution of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, societal concerns regarding opioid misuse and changing expectations regarding surgical recovery.Recent findingsParavertebral block and thoracic epidural analgesia have comparable postoperative analgesic profiles following thoracotomy; however, the former has a more favorable complication profile. Limited trials have compared these modalities in cardiac surgery. The mechanism of action of continuous paravertebral blockade may be systemic. Bilateral continuous paravertebral (and other continuous peripheral nerve blocks) should be used with caution in adult patients having cardiac surgery because of the risk of systemic local anesthetic toxicity and bleeding. Novel ultrasound-guided blocks: Erector spinae, serratus anterior, pectoral, transversus thoracic muscle and pecto-intercostal fascial plane blocks potentially reduce postoperative opioid requirements; however, they require further investigation before their routine use can be recommended in adult cardiovascular surgical practice. The mechanism of action of erector spinae block is not fully elucidated.SummaryUltrasound-guided fascial plane blocks may reduce postoperative opioid requirements. Investigation into the safety and efficacy of bilateral continuous ultrasound-guided blockade for cardiac surgery is required. Trial protocols should be embedded into enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Patient-reported and long-term outcomes are recommended.
KW - cardiovascular surgery
KW - erector spinae
KW - fascial plane blocks
KW - pectoral
KW - regional anesthesia
KW - serratus anterior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077225607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077225607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000818
DO - 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000818
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31833864
AN - SCOPUS:85077225607
SN - 0952-7907
VL - 33
SP - 64
EP - 70
JO - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
JF - Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
IS - 1
ER -