Two valuation questions in one survey: Is it a recipe for sequencing and instrument context effects?

Kelly L. Giraud, John B. Loomis, Richard Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Economic theory suggests that willingness to pay for two goods independently offered should remain unchanged when the survey instrument changes slightly. Four survey treatments consisting of comprehensive good and a subset of that good were used. The surveys alternated in the question ordering and in the embedded good which accompanied the comprehensive good. We tested for sequencing and instrument context effects using both a combined and split sample designs. In the combined sample case we found some evidence to sequencing effects in the data containing the first subset good. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that sequencing did not effect scale or location of parameters. In the test for instrument context effects, evidence was found indicating context does effect willingness to pay estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-964
Number of pages8
JournalApplied Economics
Volume31
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Context effects
Sequencing
Willingness-to-pay
Sample design
Likelihood ratio test
Economic theory
Scale effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Two valuation questions in one survey : Is it a recipe for sequencing and instrument context effects? / Giraud, Kelly L.; Loomis, John B.; Johnson, Richard.

In: Applied Economics, Vol. 31, No. 8, 1999, p. 957-964.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{43a23cca65014b7fb003a64aece103d4,
title = "Two valuation questions in one survey: Is it a recipe for sequencing and instrument context effects?",
abstract = "Economic theory suggests that willingness to pay for two goods independently offered should remain unchanged when the survey instrument changes slightly. Four survey treatments consisting of comprehensive good and a subset of that good were used. The surveys alternated in the question ordering and in the embedded good which accompanied the comprehensive good. We tested for sequencing and instrument context effects using both a combined and split sample designs. In the combined sample case we found some evidence to sequencing effects in the data containing the first subset good. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that sequencing did not effect scale or location of parameters. In the test for instrument context effects, evidence was found indicating context does effect willingness to pay estimates.",
author = "Giraud, {Kelly L.} and Loomis, {John B.} and Richard Johnson",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "957--964",
journal = "Applied Economics",
issn = "0003-6846",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two valuation questions in one survey

T2 - Is it a recipe for sequencing and instrument context effects?

AU - Giraud, Kelly L.

AU - Loomis, John B.

AU - Johnson, Richard

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Economic theory suggests that willingness to pay for two goods independently offered should remain unchanged when the survey instrument changes slightly. Four survey treatments consisting of comprehensive good and a subset of that good were used. The surveys alternated in the question ordering and in the embedded good which accompanied the comprehensive good. We tested for sequencing and instrument context effects using both a combined and split sample designs. In the combined sample case we found some evidence to sequencing effects in the data containing the first subset good. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that sequencing did not effect scale or location of parameters. In the test for instrument context effects, evidence was found indicating context does effect willingness to pay estimates.

AB - Economic theory suggests that willingness to pay for two goods independently offered should remain unchanged when the survey instrument changes slightly. Four survey treatments consisting of comprehensive good and a subset of that good were used. The surveys alternated in the question ordering and in the embedded good which accompanied the comprehensive good. We tested for sequencing and instrument context effects using both a combined and split sample designs. In the combined sample case we found some evidence to sequencing effects in the data containing the first subset good. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that sequencing did not effect scale or location of parameters. In the test for instrument context effects, evidence was found indicating context does effect willingness to pay estimates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032835117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032835117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032835117

VL - 31

SP - 957

EP - 964

JO - Applied Economics

JF - Applied Economics

SN - 0003-6846

IS - 8

ER -