Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop and test two instruments measuring decision making about level of aggressiveness of intensive care unit (ICU) patient care. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care (DAC) measures care providers' general perceptions about decision making. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care for Specific Patients (DAC[SP]) measures perceptions in specific situations. Design: Two-phase psychometric instrument evaluation. Setting: Phase I, nationally mailed questionnaire. Phase II, northeastern medical center medical ICU. Subjects: Phase I, 22 ICU nurse and physician experts. Phase II, 35 medical ICU staff nurses and eight medical resident physicians. Outcome Measure: Psychometric properties of instruments. Results: Content validity of both tools was supported by their development from the literature and by the experts. Face validity was supported by the experts, staff nurses, and medical resident physicians. Both instruments had variance in responses, internal consistency reliability (r = 0.53, r = 0.73) and, test-retest reliability (r = 0.73). Conclusion: These instruments may enrich our understanding of how care providers make bioethical decisions for ICU patients. Such understanding could assist with development of interventions to increase collaborative interdisciplinary decision making, leading to increased care provider satisfaction and better patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)542-547
Number of pages6
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Critical Care
Volume22
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intensive Care Units
Decision Making
Reproducibility of Results
Patient Care
Nurses
Physicians
Psychometrics
Medical Staff
Patient Satisfaction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making. / Baggs, Judith.

In: Heart and Lung: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1993, p. 542-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f4f5afbdc6cc424eac18f36c521b939e,
title = "Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and test two instruments measuring decision making about level of aggressiveness of intensive care unit (ICU) patient care. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care (DAC) measures care providers' general perceptions about decision making. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care for Specific Patients (DAC[SP]) measures perceptions in specific situations. Design: Two-phase psychometric instrument evaluation. Setting: Phase I, nationally mailed questionnaire. Phase II, northeastern medical center medical ICU. Subjects: Phase I, 22 ICU nurse and physician experts. Phase II, 35 medical ICU staff nurses and eight medical resident physicians. Outcome Measure: Psychometric properties of instruments. Results: Content validity of both tools was supported by their development from the literature and by the experts. Face validity was supported by the experts, staff nurses, and medical resident physicians. Both instruments had variance in responses, internal consistency reliability (r = 0.53, r = 0.73) and, test-retest reliability (r = 0.73). Conclusion: These instruments may enrich our understanding of how care providers make bioethical decisions for ICU patients. Such understanding could assist with development of interventions to increase collaborative interdisciplinary decision making, leading to increased care provider satisfaction and better patient outcomes.",
author = "Judith Baggs",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "542--547",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making

AU - Baggs, Judith

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Objective: To develop and test two instruments measuring decision making about level of aggressiveness of intensive care unit (ICU) patient care. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care (DAC) measures care providers' general perceptions about decision making. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care for Specific Patients (DAC[SP]) measures perceptions in specific situations. Design: Two-phase psychometric instrument evaluation. Setting: Phase I, nationally mailed questionnaire. Phase II, northeastern medical center medical ICU. Subjects: Phase I, 22 ICU nurse and physician experts. Phase II, 35 medical ICU staff nurses and eight medical resident physicians. Outcome Measure: Psychometric properties of instruments. Results: Content validity of both tools was supported by their development from the literature and by the experts. Face validity was supported by the experts, staff nurses, and medical resident physicians. Both instruments had variance in responses, internal consistency reliability (r = 0.53, r = 0.73) and, test-retest reliability (r = 0.73). Conclusion: These instruments may enrich our understanding of how care providers make bioethical decisions for ICU patients. Such understanding could assist with development of interventions to increase collaborative interdisciplinary decision making, leading to increased care provider satisfaction and better patient outcomes.

AB - Objective: To develop and test two instruments measuring decision making about level of aggressiveness of intensive care unit (ICU) patient care. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care (DAC) measures care providers' general perceptions about decision making. Decisions about Aggressiveness of Patient Care for Specific Patients (DAC[SP]) measures perceptions in specific situations. Design: Two-phase psychometric instrument evaluation. Setting: Phase I, nationally mailed questionnaire. Phase II, northeastern medical center medical ICU. Subjects: Phase I, 22 ICU nurse and physician experts. Phase II, 35 medical ICU staff nurses and eight medical resident physicians. Outcome Measure: Psychometric properties of instruments. Results: Content validity of both tools was supported by their development from the literature and by the experts. Face validity was supported by the experts, staff nurses, and medical resident physicians. Both instruments had variance in responses, internal consistency reliability (r = 0.53, r = 0.73) and, test-retest reliability (r = 0.73). Conclusion: These instruments may enrich our understanding of how care providers make bioethical decisions for ICU patients. Such understanding could assist with development of interventions to increase collaborative interdisciplinary decision making, leading to increased care provider satisfaction and better patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027486843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027486843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8288458

AN - SCOPUS:0027486843

VL - 22

SP - 542

EP - 547

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 6

ER -