Tube feeding: Internists' attitudes regarding ethical obligations

Marian O. Hodges, Susan Tolle, Carol Stocking, Christine K. Cassel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the attitudes of internists regarding their ethical obligation to provide or withhold tube feeding in three clinical contexts when patient preferences are not known: acute pneumonia, severe dementia, and persistent vegetative state. Methods: A written questionnaire with patient scenarios was mailed to a randomized national sample of 1000 internist members of the American College of Physicians. Results: Response was received from 58% of our sample (n=581). Only physicians with personal experience with tube feeding decisions were included in the subsequent analysis (n=326). Respondents were mostly male board- certified internists active in patient care in urban/suburban settings. Physicians demonstrated a predominant attitude for each scenario: 98% favored initiation of tube feeding for the patient with acute pneumonia; 84% opposed initiation of tube feeding for the patient with advanced dementia when depicted with a mixed happy/sad affect; and 80% favored withdrawal of tube feeding for the patient with established persistent vegetative state. Sixteen percent (n=51) described tube feeding as basic humane care, whereas 84% (n=265) believed tube feeding is medical therapy. Physicians were more opposed to tube feeding in certain patient scenarios than the literature suggests occurs in actual practice. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when patient wishes are not known, physician decisions regarding tube feeding are strongly influenced by prognosis. State legislation that categorizes tube feedings differently from other medical treatments conflicts with the judgment of the majority of internist respondents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1013-1020
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume154
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 9 1994

Fingerprint

Enteral Nutrition
Physicians
Persistent Vegetative State
Dementia
Pneumonia
Patient Preference
Legislation
Patient Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Tube feeding : Internists' attitudes regarding ethical obligations. / Hodges, Marian O.; Tolle, Susan; Stocking, Carol; Cassel, Christine K.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 154, No. 9, 09.05.1994, p. 1013-1020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hodges, Marian O. ; Tolle, Susan ; Stocking, Carol ; Cassel, Christine K. / Tube feeding : Internists' attitudes regarding ethical obligations. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 154, No. 9. pp. 1013-1020.
@article{597ff7a98c6843f1a0c2cc78719e6710,
title = "Tube feeding: Internists' attitudes regarding ethical obligations",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the attitudes of internists regarding their ethical obligation to provide or withhold tube feeding in three clinical contexts when patient preferences are not known: acute pneumonia, severe dementia, and persistent vegetative state. Methods: A written questionnaire with patient scenarios was mailed to a randomized national sample of 1000 internist members of the American College of Physicians. Results: Response was received from 58{\%} of our sample (n=581). Only physicians with personal experience with tube feeding decisions were included in the subsequent analysis (n=326). Respondents were mostly male board- certified internists active in patient care in urban/suburban settings. Physicians demonstrated a predominant attitude for each scenario: 98{\%} favored initiation of tube feeding for the patient with acute pneumonia; 84{\%} opposed initiation of tube feeding for the patient with advanced dementia when depicted with a mixed happy/sad affect; and 80{\%} favored withdrawal of tube feeding for the patient with established persistent vegetative state. Sixteen percent (n=51) described tube feeding as basic humane care, whereas 84{\%} (n=265) believed tube feeding is medical therapy. Physicians were more opposed to tube feeding in certain patient scenarios than the literature suggests occurs in actual practice. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when patient wishes are not known, physician decisions regarding tube feeding are strongly influenced by prognosis. State legislation that categorizes tube feedings differently from other medical treatments conflicts with the judgment of the majority of internist respondents.",
author = "Hodges, {Marian O.} and Susan Tolle and Carol Stocking and Cassel, {Christine K.}",
year = "1994",
month = "5",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.154.9.1013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
pages = "1013--1020",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tube feeding

T2 - Internists' attitudes regarding ethical obligations

AU - Hodges, Marian O.

AU - Tolle, Susan

AU - Stocking, Carol

AU - Cassel, Christine K.

PY - 1994/5/9

Y1 - 1994/5/9

N2 - Background: Little is known about the attitudes of internists regarding their ethical obligation to provide or withhold tube feeding in three clinical contexts when patient preferences are not known: acute pneumonia, severe dementia, and persistent vegetative state. Methods: A written questionnaire with patient scenarios was mailed to a randomized national sample of 1000 internist members of the American College of Physicians. Results: Response was received from 58% of our sample (n=581). Only physicians with personal experience with tube feeding decisions were included in the subsequent analysis (n=326). Respondents were mostly male board- certified internists active in patient care in urban/suburban settings. Physicians demonstrated a predominant attitude for each scenario: 98% favored initiation of tube feeding for the patient with acute pneumonia; 84% opposed initiation of tube feeding for the patient with advanced dementia when depicted with a mixed happy/sad affect; and 80% favored withdrawal of tube feeding for the patient with established persistent vegetative state. Sixteen percent (n=51) described tube feeding as basic humane care, whereas 84% (n=265) believed tube feeding is medical therapy. Physicians were more opposed to tube feeding in certain patient scenarios than the literature suggests occurs in actual practice. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when patient wishes are not known, physician decisions regarding tube feeding are strongly influenced by prognosis. State legislation that categorizes tube feedings differently from other medical treatments conflicts with the judgment of the majority of internist respondents.

AB - Background: Little is known about the attitudes of internists regarding their ethical obligation to provide or withhold tube feeding in three clinical contexts when patient preferences are not known: acute pneumonia, severe dementia, and persistent vegetative state. Methods: A written questionnaire with patient scenarios was mailed to a randomized national sample of 1000 internist members of the American College of Physicians. Results: Response was received from 58% of our sample (n=581). Only physicians with personal experience with tube feeding decisions were included in the subsequent analysis (n=326). Respondents were mostly male board- certified internists active in patient care in urban/suburban settings. Physicians demonstrated a predominant attitude for each scenario: 98% favored initiation of tube feeding for the patient with acute pneumonia; 84% opposed initiation of tube feeding for the patient with advanced dementia when depicted with a mixed happy/sad affect; and 80% favored withdrawal of tube feeding for the patient with established persistent vegetative state. Sixteen percent (n=51) described tube feeding as basic humane care, whereas 84% (n=265) believed tube feeding is medical therapy. Physicians were more opposed to tube feeding in certain patient scenarios than the literature suggests occurs in actual practice. Conclusions: Our data suggest that when patient wishes are not known, physician decisions regarding tube feeding are strongly influenced by prognosis. State legislation that categorizes tube feedings differently from other medical treatments conflicts with the judgment of the majority of internist respondents.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028207269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028207269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.154.9.1013

DO - 10.1001/archinte.154.9.1013

M3 - Article

C2 - 8179444

AN - SCOPUS:0028207269

VL - 154

SP - 1013

EP - 1020

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 9

ER -