Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans

Linda Ganzini, Lauren M. Denneson, Nancy Press, Matthew J. Bair, Drew A. Helmer, Jennifer Poat, Steven Dobscha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1215-1221
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Veterans
Suicide
Disclosure
Ambulatory Care
Suicidal Ideation
2003-2011 Iraq War
Afghan Campaign 2001-
Delivery of Health Care
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Behavior Therapy
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Hospitalization
Language
Research Personnel
Interviews
Depression
Health

Keywords

  • depression
  • post-traumatic stress disorder
  • qualitative methods
  • screening
  • suicide
  • veterans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans. / Ganzini, Linda; Denneson, Lauren M.; Press, Nancy; Bair, Matthew J.; Helmer, Drew A.; Poat, Jennifer; Dobscha, Steven.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 28, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 1215-1221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ganzini, Linda ; Denneson, Lauren M. ; Press, Nancy ; Bair, Matthew J. ; Helmer, Drew A. ; Poat, Jennifer ; Dobscha, Steven. / Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 9. pp. 1215-1221.
@article{0b104c05c3b24adc8b9b3cd1d9e77e88,
title = "Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.",
keywords = "depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, qualitative methods, screening, suicide, veterans",
author = "Linda Ganzini and Denneson, {Lauren M.} and Nancy Press and Bair, {Matthew J.} and Helmer, {Drew A.} and Jennifer Poat and Steven Dobscha",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-013-2412-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1215--1221",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trust is the basis for effective suicide risk screening and assessment in veterans

AU - Ganzini, Linda

AU - Denneson, Lauren M.

AU - Press, Nancy

AU - Bair, Matthew J.

AU - Helmer, Drew A.

AU - Poat, Jennifer

AU - Dobscha, Steven

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.

AB - BACKGROUND: To reduce suicides among Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has designated suicide risk assessments for Veterans who screen positive for depression or post-traumatic stress disorder as a national performance goal. Many VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) are using brief suicidal ideation screens, administered in non-mental health ambulatory care settings, as the first step in the assessment process. OBJECTIVE: To explore Veterans' perceptions of the suicide screening and risk assessment process, the barriers and facilitators to disclosing suicidal thoughts, and perceptions of possible consequences of revealing suicidal thoughts. DESIGN: Investigators recorded one semi-structured interview with each Veteran. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans who screened positive for suicidal ideation in non-mental health ambulatory care settings in 2009 and 2010. KEY RESULTS: Veterans accepted the need to assess suicide risk. They increasingly experienced attempts to suppress and avoid thoughts of suicide as burdensome and exhausting. Despite this, Veterans often failed to disclose severe and pervasive suicidal thoughts when screened because: (1) they considered suicidal thoughts as shameful and a sign of weakness; (2) they believed suicidal thoughts were private and not to be divulged to strangers; (3) they worried that disclosure would lead to unwanted hospitalization or medication recommendations; and (4) the templated computer reminder process was perceived as perfunctory and disrespectful. In contrast, admitting and discussing thoughts of suicide with a health provider who focused on building a relationship, demonstrated genuineness and empathy, offered information on the rationale for suicide risk assessment, and used straightforward and understandable language, all promoted trust that resulted in more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts. CONCLUSION: In ambulatory care settings, both provider behaviors and system modifications may lead to more honest disclosure of suicidal thoughts.

KW - depression

KW - post-traumatic stress disorder

KW - qualitative methods

KW - screening

KW - suicide

KW - veterans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883202079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883202079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-013-2412-6

DO - 10.1007/s11606-013-2412-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 23580131

AN - SCOPUS:84883202079

VL - 28

SP - 1215

EP - 1221

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 9

ER -