Traumatic cataracts secondary to combat ocular trauma Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Seattle, Washington, May 2013.

Michael P. Smith, Marcus H. Colyer, Eric D. Weichel, Richard Stutzman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To describe the characteristics, visual outcomes, and predictive value of the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) in eyes with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma. Setting Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Records of service members with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma over a 7-year period were reviewed. Visual acuity at initial presentation and visual acuity at the final follow-up were compared in addition to outcomes in closed versus open globes, by final lens status, and in eyes receiving primary versus secondary intraocular lenses (IOLs). Visual outcomes were predicted using the OTS and compared to the achieved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Results A total of 181 eyes of 167 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty-six percent of all eye injuries sustained traumatic cataract. The mean final visual outcome was 0.86 logMAR ± 1.01 (SD) with 44 no light perception (NLP) eyes and 26 light perception (LP) eyes compared with an initial visual acuity of 2.41 ± 0.88 logMAR with 27 no NLP eyes and 64 LP eyes (P ≥001, 2-tailed Student t test). Final CDVAs in eyes receiving primary IOLs were 0.72 ± 0.84 logMAR with 1 NLP and 1 LP eye versus 0.51 ± 0.78 logMAR with 2 LP eyes in eyes receiving a secondary IOL (P =.37, Student t test). Conclusion Traumatic cataracts are frequently associated with ocular trauma. The OTS is a reliable means of predicting visual outcome. There was no difference in eyes receiving primary IOLs versus secondary IOLs. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1693-1698
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Capsule Opacification
Wounds and Injuries
Intraocular Lenses
Light
Cataract
Visual Acuity
Students
Eye Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{d025ba42f9f44a71879ebbf805259fa7,
title = "Traumatic cataracts secondary to combat ocular trauma Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Seattle, Washington, May 2013.",
abstract = "Purpose To describe the characteristics, visual outcomes, and predictive value of the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) in eyes with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma. Setting Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Records of service members with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma over a 7-year period were reviewed. Visual acuity at initial presentation and visual acuity at the final follow-up were compared in addition to outcomes in closed versus open globes, by final lens status, and in eyes receiving primary versus secondary intraocular lenses (IOLs). Visual outcomes were predicted using the OTS and compared to the achieved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Results A total of 181 eyes of 167 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty-six percent of all eye injuries sustained traumatic cataract. The mean final visual outcome was 0.86 logMAR ± 1.01 (SD) with 44 no light perception (NLP) eyes and 26 light perception (LP) eyes compared with an initial visual acuity of 2.41 ± 0.88 logMAR with 27 no NLP eyes and 64 LP eyes (P ≥001, 2-tailed Student t test). Final CDVAs in eyes receiving primary IOLs were 0.72 ± 0.84 logMAR with 1 NLP and 1 LP eye versus 0.51 ± 0.78 logMAR with 2 LP eyes in eyes receiving a secondary IOL (P =.37, Student t test). Conclusion Traumatic cataracts are frequently associated with ocular trauma. The OTS is a reliable means of predicting visual outcome. There was no difference in eyes receiving primary IOLs versus secondary IOLs. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.",
author = "Smith, {Michael P.} and Colyer, {Marcus H.} and Weichel, {Eric D.} and Richard Stutzman",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "1693--1698",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traumatic cataracts secondary to combat ocular trauma Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Seattle, Washington, May 2013.

AU - Smith, Michael P.

AU - Colyer, Marcus H.

AU - Weichel, Eric D.

AU - Stutzman, Richard

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose To describe the characteristics, visual outcomes, and predictive value of the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) in eyes with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma. Setting Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Records of service members with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma over a 7-year period were reviewed. Visual acuity at initial presentation and visual acuity at the final follow-up were compared in addition to outcomes in closed versus open globes, by final lens status, and in eyes receiving primary versus secondary intraocular lenses (IOLs). Visual outcomes were predicted using the OTS and compared to the achieved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Results A total of 181 eyes of 167 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty-six percent of all eye injuries sustained traumatic cataract. The mean final visual outcome was 0.86 logMAR ± 1.01 (SD) with 44 no light perception (NLP) eyes and 26 light perception (LP) eyes compared with an initial visual acuity of 2.41 ± 0.88 logMAR with 27 no NLP eyes and 64 LP eyes (P ≥001, 2-tailed Student t test). Final CDVAs in eyes receiving primary IOLs were 0.72 ± 0.84 logMAR with 1 NLP and 1 LP eye versus 0.51 ± 0.78 logMAR with 2 LP eyes in eyes receiving a secondary IOL (P =.37, Student t test). Conclusion Traumatic cataracts are frequently associated with ocular trauma. The OTS is a reliable means of predicting visual outcome. There was no difference in eyes receiving primary IOLs versus secondary IOLs. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

AB - Purpose To describe the characteristics, visual outcomes, and predictive value of the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) in eyes with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma. Setting Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Design Retrospective case series. Methods Records of service members with traumatic cataract from combat ocular trauma over a 7-year period were reviewed. Visual acuity at initial presentation and visual acuity at the final follow-up were compared in addition to outcomes in closed versus open globes, by final lens status, and in eyes receiving primary versus secondary intraocular lenses (IOLs). Visual outcomes were predicted using the OTS and compared to the achieved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Results A total of 181 eyes of 167 patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty-six percent of all eye injuries sustained traumatic cataract. The mean final visual outcome was 0.86 logMAR ± 1.01 (SD) with 44 no light perception (NLP) eyes and 26 light perception (LP) eyes compared with an initial visual acuity of 2.41 ± 0.88 logMAR with 27 no NLP eyes and 64 LP eyes (P ≥001, 2-tailed Student t test). Final CDVAs in eyes receiving primary IOLs were 0.72 ± 0.84 logMAR with 1 NLP and 1 LP eye versus 0.51 ± 0.78 logMAR with 2 LP eyes in eyes receiving a secondary IOL (P =.37, Student t test). Conclusion Traumatic cataracts are frequently associated with ocular trauma. The OTS is a reliable means of predicting visual outcome. There was no difference in eyes receiving primary IOLs versus secondary IOLs. Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942910557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942910557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.059

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.059

M3 - Article

C2 - 26432127

AN - SCOPUS:84942910557

VL - 41

SP - 1693

EP - 1698

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 8

ER -