Traumatic brain injury in latin America: Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol

Randall M. Chesnut, Nancy Temkin, Nancy Carney, Sureyya Dikmen, Jim Pridgeon, Jason Barber, Juanita M. Celix, Kelley Chaddock, Marianna Cherner, Terence Hendrix, Silvia Lujan, Joan MacHamer, Gustavo Petroni, Carlos Rondina, Walter Videtta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although in the developed world the intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is considered the standard of care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), its usefulness to direct treatment decisions has never been tested rigorously. OBJECTIVE: The primary focus was to conduct a high-quality, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether ICP monitoring used to direct TBI treatment improves patient outcomes. By providing education, equipment, and structure, the project will enhance the research capacity of the collaborating investigators and will foster the collaborations established during earlier studies. METHODS: Study centers were selected that routinely treated ICP based on clinical examination and computed tomography imaging using internal protocols. We randomized patients to either an ICP monitor group or an imaging and clinical examination group. Treatment decisions for the ICP monitor group are guided by ICP monitoring based on established guidelines. Treatment decisions for the imaging and clinical examination group are made using a single protocol derived from those previously being used at those centers. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: There are 2 study hypotheses: (1) patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have improved outcomes and 2) incorporating ICP monitoring in the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize complications and decrease length of intensive care unit stay. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial tests the effectiveness of a management protocol based on technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world: the ICP monitor. A randomized, controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed-a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of this randomized, controlled trial will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1055-1063
Number of pages9
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Latin America
Intracranial Pressure
Clinical Protocols
Randomized Controlled Trials
Traumatic Brain Injury
Therapeutics
Standard of Care
Intensive Care Units
Patient Care
Tomography
Research Personnel
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Technology
Education

Keywords

  • Clinical research protocol
  • Craniocerebral trauma
  • Intracranial pressure
  • Randomized controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Chesnut, R. M., Temkin, N., Carney, N., Dikmen, S., Pridgeon, J., Barber, J., ... Videtta, W. (2012). Traumatic brain injury in latin America: Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol. Neurosurgery, 71(6), 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7

Traumatic brain injury in latin America : Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol. / Chesnut, Randall M.; Temkin, Nancy; Carney, Nancy; Dikmen, Sureyya; Pridgeon, Jim; Barber, Jason; Celix, Juanita M.; Chaddock, Kelley; Cherner, Marianna; Hendrix, Terence; Lujan, Silvia; MacHamer, Joan; Petroni, Gustavo; Rondina, Carlos; Videtta, Walter.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 71, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 1055-1063.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chesnut, RM, Temkin, N, Carney, N, Dikmen, S, Pridgeon, J, Barber, J, Celix, JM, Chaddock, K, Cherner, M, Hendrix, T, Lujan, S, MacHamer, J, Petroni, G, Rondina, C & Videtta, W 2012, 'Traumatic brain injury in latin America: Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol', Neurosurgery, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7
Chesnut, Randall M. ; Temkin, Nancy ; Carney, Nancy ; Dikmen, Sureyya ; Pridgeon, Jim ; Barber, Jason ; Celix, Juanita M. ; Chaddock, Kelley ; Cherner, Marianna ; Hendrix, Terence ; Lujan, Silvia ; MacHamer, Joan ; Petroni, Gustavo ; Rondina, Carlos ; Videtta, Walter. / Traumatic brain injury in latin America : Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol. In: Neurosurgery. 2012 ; Vol. 71, No. 6. pp. 1055-1063.
@article{5b43c95bc5594424be3906418b1ba228,
title = "Traumatic brain injury in latin America: Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Although in the developed world the intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is considered the standard of care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), its usefulness to direct treatment decisions has never been tested rigorously. OBJECTIVE: The primary focus was to conduct a high-quality, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether ICP monitoring used to direct TBI treatment improves patient outcomes. By providing education, equipment, and structure, the project will enhance the research capacity of the collaborating investigators and will foster the collaborations established during earlier studies. METHODS: Study centers were selected that routinely treated ICP based on clinical examination and computed tomography imaging using internal protocols. We randomized patients to either an ICP monitor group or an imaging and clinical examination group. Treatment decisions for the ICP monitor group are guided by ICP monitoring based on established guidelines. Treatment decisions for the imaging and clinical examination group are made using a single protocol derived from those previously being used at those centers. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: There are 2 study hypotheses: (1) patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have improved outcomes and 2) incorporating ICP monitoring in the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize complications and decrease length of intensive care unit stay. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial tests the effectiveness of a management protocol based on technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world: the ICP monitor. A randomized, controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed-a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of this randomized, controlled trial will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.",
keywords = "Clinical research protocol, Craniocerebral trauma, Intracranial pressure, Randomized controlled trial",
author = "Chesnut, {Randall M.} and Nancy Temkin and Nancy Carney and Sureyya Dikmen and Jim Pridgeon and Jason Barber and Celix, {Juanita M.} and Kelley Chaddock and Marianna Cherner and Terence Hendrix and Silvia Lujan and Joan MacHamer and Gustavo Petroni and Carlos Rondina and Walter Videtta",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "1055--1063",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traumatic brain injury in latin America

T2 - Lifespan analysis randomized control trial protocol

AU - Chesnut, Randall M.

AU - Temkin, Nancy

AU - Carney, Nancy

AU - Dikmen, Sureyya

AU - Pridgeon, Jim

AU - Barber, Jason

AU - Celix, Juanita M.

AU - Chaddock, Kelley

AU - Cherner, Marianna

AU - Hendrix, Terence

AU - Lujan, Silvia

AU - MacHamer, Joan

AU - Petroni, Gustavo

AU - Rondina, Carlos

AU - Videtta, Walter

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: Although in the developed world the intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is considered the standard of care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), its usefulness to direct treatment decisions has never been tested rigorously. OBJECTIVE: The primary focus was to conduct a high-quality, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether ICP monitoring used to direct TBI treatment improves patient outcomes. By providing education, equipment, and structure, the project will enhance the research capacity of the collaborating investigators and will foster the collaborations established during earlier studies. METHODS: Study centers were selected that routinely treated ICP based on clinical examination and computed tomography imaging using internal protocols. We randomized patients to either an ICP monitor group or an imaging and clinical examination group. Treatment decisions for the ICP monitor group are guided by ICP monitoring based on established guidelines. Treatment decisions for the imaging and clinical examination group are made using a single protocol derived from those previously being used at those centers. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: There are 2 study hypotheses: (1) patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have improved outcomes and 2) incorporating ICP monitoring in the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize complications and decrease length of intensive care unit stay. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial tests the effectiveness of a management protocol based on technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world: the ICP monitor. A randomized, controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed-a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of this randomized, controlled trial will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.

AB - BACKGROUND: Although in the developed world the intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is considered the standard of care for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), its usefulness to direct treatment decisions has never been tested rigorously. OBJECTIVE: The primary focus was to conduct a high-quality, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether ICP monitoring used to direct TBI treatment improves patient outcomes. By providing education, equipment, and structure, the project will enhance the research capacity of the collaborating investigators and will foster the collaborations established during earlier studies. METHODS: Study centers were selected that routinely treated ICP based on clinical examination and computed tomography imaging using internal protocols. We randomized patients to either an ICP monitor group or an imaging and clinical examination group. Treatment decisions for the ICP monitor group are guided by ICP monitoring based on established guidelines. Treatment decisions for the imaging and clinical examination group are made using a single protocol derived from those previously being used at those centers. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: There are 2 study hypotheses: (1) patients with severe TBI whose acute care treatment is managed using ICP monitors will have improved outcomes and 2) incorporating ICP monitoring in the care of patients with severe TBI will minimize complications and decrease length of intensive care unit stay. DISCUSSION: This clinical trial tests the effectiveness of a management protocol based on technology considered pivotal to brain trauma treatment in the developed world: the ICP monitor. A randomized, controlled trial of ICP monitoring has never been performed-a critical gap in the evidence base that supports the role of ICP monitoring in TBI care. As such, the results of this randomized, controlled trial will have global implications regardless of the level of development of the trauma system.

KW - Clinical research protocol

KW - Craniocerebral trauma

KW - Intracranial pressure

KW - Randomized controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870066987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870066987&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7

DO - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827276b7

M3 - Article

C2 - 22986600

AN - SCOPUS:84870066987

VL - 71

SP - 1055

EP - 1063

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 6

ER -