Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre

Olusegun O. Soge, David No, Karen E. Michael, Jennifer Dankoff, Jennifer Lane, Keith Vogel, Jeremy Smedley, Marilyn C. Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: MDR MRSA isolates cultured from primates, their facility and primate personnel from the Washington National Primate Research Center were characterized to determine whether they were epidemiologically related to each other and if they represented common local human-associated MRSA strains. Methods: Human and primate nasal and composite environmental samples were collected, enriched and selected on medium supplemented with oxacillin and polymyxin B. Isolates were biochemically verified as Staphylococcus aureus and screened for the mecA gene. Selected isolates were characterized using SCCmec typing, MLST and WGS. Results: Nasal cultures were performed on 596 primates and 105 (17.6%) were MRSA positive. Two of 79 (2.5%) personnel and two of 56 (3.6%) composite primate environmental facility samples were MRSA positive. Three MRSA isolates from primates, one MRSA from personnel, two environmental MRSA and one primate MSSA were ST188 and were the same strain type by conventional typing methods. ST188 isolates were related to a 2007 ST188 human isolate from Hong Kong. Both MRSA isolates from out-of-state primates had a novel MLST type, ST3268, and an unrelated group. All isolates carried ≥1 other antibiotic resistance gene(s), including tet(38), the only tet gene identified. Conclusions: ST188 is very rare in North America and has almost exclusively been identified in people from Pan-Asia, while ST3268 is a newly reported MRSA type. The data suggest that the primate MDR MRSA was unlikely to come from primate centre employees. Captive primates are likely to be an unappreciated source of MRSA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberdkw236
Pages (from-to)2798-2803
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Volume71
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Primates
Nose
Genes
Oxacillin
Polymyxin B
Hong Kong
Microbial Drug Resistance
North America
Staphylococcus aureus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Soge, O. O., No, D., Michael, K. E., Dankoff, J., Lane, J., Vogel, K., ... Roberts, M. C. (2016). Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 71(10), 2798-2803. [dkw236]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw236

Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre. / Soge, Olusegun O.; No, David; Michael, Karen E.; Dankoff, Jennifer; Lane, Jennifer; Vogel, Keith; Smedley, Jeremy; Roberts, Marilyn C.

In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol. 71, No. 10, dkw236, 01.10.2016, p. 2798-2803.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soge, Olusegun O. ; No, David ; Michael, Karen E. ; Dankoff, Jennifer ; Lane, Jennifer ; Vogel, Keith ; Smedley, Jeremy ; Roberts, Marilyn C. / Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre. In: Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2016 ; Vol. 71, No. 10. pp. 2798-2803.
@article{1daf5db1a4914431a755d673b70d54cd,
title = "Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre",
abstract = "Objectives: MDR MRSA isolates cultured from primates, their facility and primate personnel from the Washington National Primate Research Center were characterized to determine whether they were epidemiologically related to each other and if they represented common local human-associated MRSA strains. Methods: Human and primate nasal and composite environmental samples were collected, enriched and selected on medium supplemented with oxacillin and polymyxin B. Isolates were biochemically verified as Staphylococcus aureus and screened for the mecA gene. Selected isolates were characterized using SCCmec typing, MLST and WGS. Results: Nasal cultures were performed on 596 primates and 105 (17.6{\%}) were MRSA positive. Two of 79 (2.5{\%}) personnel and two of 56 (3.6{\%}) composite primate environmental facility samples were MRSA positive. Three MRSA isolates from primates, one MRSA from personnel, two environmental MRSA and one primate MSSA were ST188 and were the same strain type by conventional typing methods. ST188 isolates were related to a 2007 ST188 human isolate from Hong Kong. Both MRSA isolates from out-of-state primates had a novel MLST type, ST3268, and an unrelated group. All isolates carried ≥1 other antibiotic resistance gene(s), including tet(38), the only tet gene identified. Conclusions: ST188 is very rare in North America and has almost exclusively been identified in people from Pan-Asia, while ST3268 is a newly reported MRSA type. The data suggest that the primate MDR MRSA was unlikely to come from primate centre employees. Captive primates are likely to be an unappreciated source of MRSA.",
author = "Soge, {Olusegun O.} and David No and Michael, {Karen E.} and Jennifer Dankoff and Jennifer Lane and Keith Vogel and Jeremy Smedley and Roberts, {Marilyn C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jac/dkw236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "2798--2803",
journal = "Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy",
issn = "0305-7453",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transmission of MDR MRSA between primates, their environment and personnel at a United States primate centre

AU - Soge, Olusegun O.

AU - No, David

AU - Michael, Karen E.

AU - Dankoff, Jennifer

AU - Lane, Jennifer

AU - Vogel, Keith

AU - Smedley, Jeremy

AU - Roberts, Marilyn C.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objectives: MDR MRSA isolates cultured from primates, their facility and primate personnel from the Washington National Primate Research Center were characterized to determine whether they were epidemiologically related to each other and if they represented common local human-associated MRSA strains. Methods: Human and primate nasal and composite environmental samples were collected, enriched and selected on medium supplemented with oxacillin and polymyxin B. Isolates were biochemically verified as Staphylococcus aureus and screened for the mecA gene. Selected isolates were characterized using SCCmec typing, MLST and WGS. Results: Nasal cultures were performed on 596 primates and 105 (17.6%) were MRSA positive. Two of 79 (2.5%) personnel and two of 56 (3.6%) composite primate environmental facility samples were MRSA positive. Three MRSA isolates from primates, one MRSA from personnel, two environmental MRSA and one primate MSSA were ST188 and were the same strain type by conventional typing methods. ST188 isolates were related to a 2007 ST188 human isolate from Hong Kong. Both MRSA isolates from out-of-state primates had a novel MLST type, ST3268, and an unrelated group. All isolates carried ≥1 other antibiotic resistance gene(s), including tet(38), the only tet gene identified. Conclusions: ST188 is very rare in North America and has almost exclusively been identified in people from Pan-Asia, while ST3268 is a newly reported MRSA type. The data suggest that the primate MDR MRSA was unlikely to come from primate centre employees. Captive primates are likely to be an unappreciated source of MRSA.

AB - Objectives: MDR MRSA isolates cultured from primates, their facility and primate personnel from the Washington National Primate Research Center were characterized to determine whether they were epidemiologically related to each other and if they represented common local human-associated MRSA strains. Methods: Human and primate nasal and composite environmental samples were collected, enriched and selected on medium supplemented with oxacillin and polymyxin B. Isolates were biochemically verified as Staphylococcus aureus and screened for the mecA gene. Selected isolates were characterized using SCCmec typing, MLST and WGS. Results: Nasal cultures were performed on 596 primates and 105 (17.6%) were MRSA positive. Two of 79 (2.5%) personnel and two of 56 (3.6%) composite primate environmental facility samples were MRSA positive. Three MRSA isolates from primates, one MRSA from personnel, two environmental MRSA and one primate MSSA were ST188 and were the same strain type by conventional typing methods. ST188 isolates were related to a 2007 ST188 human isolate from Hong Kong. Both MRSA isolates from out-of-state primates had a novel MLST type, ST3268, and an unrelated group. All isolates carried ≥1 other antibiotic resistance gene(s), including tet(38), the only tet gene identified. Conclusions: ST188 is very rare in North America and has almost exclusively been identified in people from Pan-Asia, while ST3268 is a newly reported MRSA type. The data suggest that the primate MDR MRSA was unlikely to come from primate centre employees. Captive primates are likely to be an unappreciated source of MRSA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994709981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994709981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkw236

DO - 10.1093/jac/dkw236

M3 - Article

C2 - 27439524

AN - SCOPUS:84994709981

VL - 71

SP - 2798

EP - 2803

JO - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

SN - 0305-7453

IS - 10

M1 - dkw236

ER -