Translating agricultural health and medicine education across the Pacific: A United States and Australian comparison study

S. A. Brumby, J. Ruldolphi, Diane Rohlman, K. J. Donham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Populations in agricultural communities require health care that is interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral to address the high rate of workplace deaths, preventable injuries and illness. These rates are compounded by limited access to services and the distinctive personal values and culture of farming populations, which both health and rural practitioners must be aware of to reduce the gap between rural and urban population health outcomes. To address the unique health and medical characteristics of agricultural populations, education in agricultural medicine was established through the College of Medicine and the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in the USA. The course was initially developed in 1974 for teaching medical students, family medicine residents and nurses, and a postgraduate curriculum was added in 2006 to develop medical/health and rural professionals' cultural competence to work in agricultural communities. This article reviews the adaptation of the US course to Australia and the educational and practice outcomes of students who completed the agricultural medicine course in either Australia or the USA. Methods: Data were collected from students who completed either the Agricultural Medicine: Occupational and Environmental Health for Rural Health Professionals course in the state of Iowa in the USA or the Agricultural Health and Medicine course in the state of Victoria in Australia between 2010 and 2013 (inclusive). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, frequencies and the 2 test. Students were invited to make any other comments regarding the course. Results: One hundred and ten students completed the survey (59 from the USA and 51 from Australia) with over a 50% response from both countries, indicating the high level of commitment to this discipline. Responses were consistent across both continents, with more than 91% agreeing that the course improved their abilities to diagnose, prevent and treat rural and agricultural populations. Further, both courses successfully enabled a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach to agricultural health and medicine. Conclusions: More than 72% of previous students were practising in rural and /or mixed communities at the time of the survey, demonstrating a repeatable and transferable medical education program that supports multidisciplinary care and scholarship while addressing health inequities in agricultural populations. Findings from this study indicate there are opportunities to expand globally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalRural and Remote Health
Volume17
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Education
Medicine
medicine
agricultural population
Rural Health
health
Students
education
Health
Rural Population
rural population
student
environmental medicine
Population
Cultural Competency
Urban Health
Professional Competence
Community Health Services
occupational medicine
Aptitude

Keywords

  • Agricultural medicine
  • Australia
  • cultural competence
  • Education
  • Farmer
  • Medicine
  • Nursing
  • Prevention
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medical Services
  • Health(social science)
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Translating agricultural health and medicine education across the Pacific : A United States and Australian comparison study. / Brumby, S. A.; Ruldolphi, J.; Rohlman, Diane; Donham, K. J.

In: Rural and Remote Health, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5db2b9241f841c1a97f79a8f252b000,
title = "Translating agricultural health and medicine education across the Pacific: A United States and Australian comparison study",
abstract = "Background: Populations in agricultural communities require health care that is interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral to address the high rate of workplace deaths, preventable injuries and illness. These rates are compounded by limited access to services and the distinctive personal values and culture of farming populations, which both health and rural practitioners must be aware of to reduce the gap between rural and urban population health outcomes. To address the unique health and medical characteristics of agricultural populations, education in agricultural medicine was established through the College of Medicine and the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in the USA. The course was initially developed in 1974 for teaching medical students, family medicine residents and nurses, and a postgraduate curriculum was added in 2006 to develop medical/health and rural professionals' cultural competence to work in agricultural communities. This article reviews the adaptation of the US course to Australia and the educational and practice outcomes of students who completed the agricultural medicine course in either Australia or the USA. Methods: Data were collected from students who completed either the Agricultural Medicine: Occupational and Environmental Health for Rural Health Professionals course in the state of Iowa in the USA or the Agricultural Health and Medicine course in the state of Victoria in Australia between 2010 and 2013 (inclusive). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, frequencies and the 2 test. Students were invited to make any other comments regarding the course. Results: One hundred and ten students completed the survey (59 from the USA and 51 from Australia) with over a 50{\%} response from both countries, indicating the high level of commitment to this discipline. Responses were consistent across both continents, with more than 91{\%} agreeing that the course improved their abilities to diagnose, prevent and treat rural and agricultural populations. Further, both courses successfully enabled a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach to agricultural health and medicine. Conclusions: More than 72{\%} of previous students were practising in rural and /or mixed communities at the time of the survey, demonstrating a repeatable and transferable medical education program that supports multidisciplinary care and scholarship while addressing health inequities in agricultural populations. Findings from this study indicate there are opportunities to expand globally.",
keywords = "Agricultural medicine, Australia, cultural competence, Education, Farmer, Medicine, Nursing, Prevention, USA",
author = "Brumby, {S. A.} and J. Ruldolphi and Diane Rohlman and Donham, {K. J.}",
year = "2017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "Rural and Remote Health",
issn = "1445-6354",
publisher = "Deakin University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating agricultural health and medicine education across the Pacific

T2 - A United States and Australian comparison study

AU - Brumby, S. A.

AU - Ruldolphi, J.

AU - Rohlman, Diane

AU - Donham, K. J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background: Populations in agricultural communities require health care that is interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral to address the high rate of workplace deaths, preventable injuries and illness. These rates are compounded by limited access to services and the distinctive personal values and culture of farming populations, which both health and rural practitioners must be aware of to reduce the gap between rural and urban population health outcomes. To address the unique health and medical characteristics of agricultural populations, education in agricultural medicine was established through the College of Medicine and the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in the USA. The course was initially developed in 1974 for teaching medical students, family medicine residents and nurses, and a postgraduate curriculum was added in 2006 to develop medical/health and rural professionals' cultural competence to work in agricultural communities. This article reviews the adaptation of the US course to Australia and the educational and practice outcomes of students who completed the agricultural medicine course in either Australia or the USA. Methods: Data were collected from students who completed either the Agricultural Medicine: Occupational and Environmental Health for Rural Health Professionals course in the state of Iowa in the USA or the Agricultural Health and Medicine course in the state of Victoria in Australia between 2010 and 2013 (inclusive). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, frequencies and the 2 test. Students were invited to make any other comments regarding the course. Results: One hundred and ten students completed the survey (59 from the USA and 51 from Australia) with over a 50% response from both countries, indicating the high level of commitment to this discipline. Responses were consistent across both continents, with more than 91% agreeing that the course improved their abilities to diagnose, prevent and treat rural and agricultural populations. Further, both courses successfully enabled a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach to agricultural health and medicine. Conclusions: More than 72% of previous students were practising in rural and /or mixed communities at the time of the survey, demonstrating a repeatable and transferable medical education program that supports multidisciplinary care and scholarship while addressing health inequities in agricultural populations. Findings from this study indicate there are opportunities to expand globally.

AB - Background: Populations in agricultural communities require health care that is interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral to address the high rate of workplace deaths, preventable injuries and illness. These rates are compounded by limited access to services and the distinctive personal values and culture of farming populations, which both health and rural practitioners must be aware of to reduce the gap between rural and urban population health outcomes. To address the unique health and medical characteristics of agricultural populations, education in agricultural medicine was established through the College of Medicine and the College of Public Health at the University of Iowa in the USA. The course was initially developed in 1974 for teaching medical students, family medicine residents and nurses, and a postgraduate curriculum was added in 2006 to develop medical/health and rural professionals' cultural competence to work in agricultural communities. This article reviews the adaptation of the US course to Australia and the educational and practice outcomes of students who completed the agricultural medicine course in either Australia or the USA. Methods: Data were collected from students who completed either the Agricultural Medicine: Occupational and Environmental Health for Rural Health Professionals course in the state of Iowa in the USA or the Agricultural Health and Medicine course in the state of Victoria in Australia between 2010 and 2013 (inclusive). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, frequencies and the 2 test. Students were invited to make any other comments regarding the course. Results: One hundred and ten students completed the survey (59 from the USA and 51 from Australia) with over a 50% response from both countries, indicating the high level of commitment to this discipline. Responses were consistent across both continents, with more than 91% agreeing that the course improved their abilities to diagnose, prevent and treat rural and agricultural populations. Further, both courses successfully enabled a multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach to agricultural health and medicine. Conclusions: More than 72% of previous students were practising in rural and /or mixed communities at the time of the survey, demonstrating a repeatable and transferable medical education program that supports multidisciplinary care and scholarship while addressing health inequities in agricultural populations. Findings from this study indicate there are opportunities to expand globally.

KW - Agricultural medicine

KW - Australia

KW - cultural competence

KW - Education

KW - Farmer

KW - Medicine

KW - Nursing

KW - Prevention

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017554385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017554385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28292189

AN - SCOPUS:85017554385

VL - 17

JO - Rural and Remote Health

JF - Rural and Remote Health

SN - 1445-6354

IS - 1

ER -