Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

168 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the validity and reliability of many newer health status instruments have been reported, few data are available regarding the sensitivity of these instruments to clinically discernible changes in patient status. We studied this feature of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, comparing it with more traditional measures of functional status (the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional classification and a patient self-rating scale). Four different approaches were devised to measure "sensitivity to clinical change." These involved comparisons of functional score changes with clinical changes in patient status which were independently agreed upon by both clinician and patient, and also comparisons with several clinical disease severity indicators. When applied to groups of patients, the SIP and the patient self-rating scale were modestly superior to the ARA scale, but neither the SIP nor the self-rating scale was clearly superior to the other. For considering individual patients, all of the scales were relatively insensitive, and predictive accuracy for clinically estimated change was low. New strategies for assessing sensitivity to small changes should be developed and applied to health status and functional scales. Attention to this characteristic should allow refinement of existing scales and may enhance their clinical usefulness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-289
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

rating scale
rheumatism
Health Status
health status
illness
Sickness Impact Profile
Group
Rheumatic Diseases
Disease
Reproducibility of Results
Rheumatoid Arthritis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Toward clinical applications of health status measures : sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Inui, T. S.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 08.1984, p. 277-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e711b1ba30424f7594df36ed8131738f,
title = "Toward clinical applications of health status measures: sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes.",
abstract = "While the validity and reliability of many newer health status instruments have been reported, few data are available regarding the sensitivity of these instruments to clinically discernible changes in patient status. We studied this feature of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, comparing it with more traditional measures of functional status (the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional classification and a patient self-rating scale). Four different approaches were devised to measure {"}sensitivity to clinical change.{"} These involved comparisons of functional score changes with clinical changes in patient status which were independently agreed upon by both clinician and patient, and also comparisons with several clinical disease severity indicators. When applied to groups of patients, the SIP and the patient self-rating scale were modestly superior to the ARA scale, but neither the SIP nor the self-rating scale was clearly superior to the other. For considering individual patients, all of the scales were relatively insensitive, and predictive accuracy for clinically estimated change was low. New strategies for assessing sensitivity to small changes should be developed and applied to health status and functional scales. Attention to this characteristic should allow refinement of existing scales and may enhance their clinical usefulness.",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Inui, {T. S.}",
year = "1984",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "277--289",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward clinical applications of health status measures

T2 - sensitivity of scales to clinically important changes.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Inui, T. S.

PY - 1984/8

Y1 - 1984/8

N2 - While the validity and reliability of many newer health status instruments have been reported, few data are available regarding the sensitivity of these instruments to clinically discernible changes in patient status. We studied this feature of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, comparing it with more traditional measures of functional status (the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional classification and a patient self-rating scale). Four different approaches were devised to measure "sensitivity to clinical change." These involved comparisons of functional score changes with clinical changes in patient status which were independently agreed upon by both clinician and patient, and also comparisons with several clinical disease severity indicators. When applied to groups of patients, the SIP and the patient self-rating scale were modestly superior to the ARA scale, but neither the SIP nor the self-rating scale was clearly superior to the other. For considering individual patients, all of the scales were relatively insensitive, and predictive accuracy for clinically estimated change was low. New strategies for assessing sensitivity to small changes should be developed and applied to health status and functional scales. Attention to this characteristic should allow refinement of existing scales and may enhance their clinical usefulness.

AB - While the validity and reliability of many newer health status instruments have been reported, few data are available regarding the sensitivity of these instruments to clinically discernible changes in patient status. We studied this feature of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, comparing it with more traditional measures of functional status (the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional classification and a patient self-rating scale). Four different approaches were devised to measure "sensitivity to clinical change." These involved comparisons of functional score changes with clinical changes in patient status which were independently agreed upon by both clinician and patient, and also comparisons with several clinical disease severity indicators. When applied to groups of patients, the SIP and the patient self-rating scale were modestly superior to the ARA scale, but neither the SIP nor the self-rating scale was clearly superior to the other. For considering individual patients, all of the scales were relatively insensitive, and predictive accuracy for clinically estimated change was low. New strategies for assessing sensitivity to small changes should be developed and applied to health status and functional scales. Attention to this characteristic should allow refinement of existing scales and may enhance their clinical usefulness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021474879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021474879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6746293

AN - SCOPUS:0021474879

VL - 19

SP - 277

EP - 289

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 3

ER -