Top Surgery in Transgender Men: How Far Can You Push the Envelope?

Rachel Bluebond-Langner, Jens Berli, Jennifer Sabino, Karan Chopra, Devinder Singh, Beverly Fischer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The authors present their grading scale and the outcomes of the largest cohort of top surgery published to date. Application of this grading system can help determine which patients will benefit from a subcutaneous mastectomy with free nipple graft versus a circumareolar technique, with the primary endpoint being need for aesthetic revisions. Methods: The authors reviewed their database of transgender males who underwent bilateral mastectomy between 2006 and 2015. Data collected included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, testosterone use, months of social transition, technique used, postoperative complications, and need for revision. Two techniques were used, circumareolar incision and free nipple graft technique. Results: Between 2006 and 2015, 1686 consecutive mastectomies were performed on 843 patients. Of those, 548 patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Of the 295 included, 109 were treated using a circumareolar incision and 186 were treated using a free nipple graft technique. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of aesthetic revisions in the grade 2B circumareolar incision group (34 percent versus 8.8 percent). Conclusions: The authors' outcomes are comparable to the literature, and demonstrate that these procedures can safely be performed in an outpatient setting. The authors' grading scale classifies patients and helps the surgeon select a surgical technique. The authors show a statistical difference in rates of aesthetic revisions in Fischer grade 2B patients when a circumareolar incision is selected over a free nipple graft technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)873e-882e
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume139
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Nipples
Esthetics
Transplants
Mastectomy
Subcutaneous Mastectomy
Testosterone
Body Mass Index
Outpatients
Smoking
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Top Surgery in Transgender Men : How Far Can You Push the Envelope? / Bluebond-Langner, Rachel; Berli, Jens; Sabino, Jennifer; Chopra, Karan; Singh, Devinder; Fischer, Beverly.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 4, 01.04.2017, p. 873e-882e.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bluebond-Langner, R, Berli, J, Sabino, J, Chopra, K, Singh, D & Fischer, B 2017, 'Top Surgery in Transgender Men: How Far Can You Push the Envelope?', Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 873e-882e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003225
Bluebond-Langner, Rachel ; Berli, Jens ; Sabino, Jennifer ; Chopra, Karan ; Singh, Devinder ; Fischer, Beverly. / Top Surgery in Transgender Men : How Far Can You Push the Envelope?. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 139, No. 4. pp. 873e-882e.
@article{617d117491bc4c51ba179b0a409aedd8,
title = "Top Surgery in Transgender Men: How Far Can You Push the Envelope?",
abstract = "Background: The authors present their grading scale and the outcomes of the largest cohort of top surgery published to date. Application of this grading system can help determine which patients will benefit from a subcutaneous mastectomy with free nipple graft versus a circumareolar technique, with the primary endpoint being need for aesthetic revisions. Methods: The authors reviewed their database of transgender males who underwent bilateral mastectomy between 2006 and 2015. Data collected included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, testosterone use, months of social transition, technique used, postoperative complications, and need for revision. Two techniques were used, circumareolar incision and free nipple graft technique. Results: Between 2006 and 2015, 1686 consecutive mastectomies were performed on 843 patients. Of those, 548 patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Of the 295 included, 109 were treated using a circumareolar incision and 186 were treated using a free nipple graft technique. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of aesthetic revisions in the grade 2B circumareolar incision group (34 percent versus 8.8 percent). Conclusions: The authors' outcomes are comparable to the literature, and demonstrate that these procedures can safely be performed in an outpatient setting. The authors' grading scale classifies patients and helps the surgeon select a surgical technique. The authors show a statistical difference in rates of aesthetic revisions in Fischer grade 2B patients when a circumareolar incision is selected over a free nipple graft technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.",
author = "Rachel Bluebond-Langner and Jens Berli and Jennifer Sabino and Karan Chopra and Devinder Singh and Beverly Fischer",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000003225",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "139",
pages = "873e--882e",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Top Surgery in Transgender Men

T2 - How Far Can You Push the Envelope?

AU - Bluebond-Langner, Rachel

AU - Berli, Jens

AU - Sabino, Jennifer

AU - Chopra, Karan

AU - Singh, Devinder

AU - Fischer, Beverly

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Background: The authors present their grading scale and the outcomes of the largest cohort of top surgery published to date. Application of this grading system can help determine which patients will benefit from a subcutaneous mastectomy with free nipple graft versus a circumareolar technique, with the primary endpoint being need for aesthetic revisions. Methods: The authors reviewed their database of transgender males who underwent bilateral mastectomy between 2006 and 2015. Data collected included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, testosterone use, months of social transition, technique used, postoperative complications, and need for revision. Two techniques were used, circumareolar incision and free nipple graft technique. Results: Between 2006 and 2015, 1686 consecutive mastectomies were performed on 843 patients. Of those, 548 patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Of the 295 included, 109 were treated using a circumareolar incision and 186 were treated using a free nipple graft technique. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of aesthetic revisions in the grade 2B circumareolar incision group (34 percent versus 8.8 percent). Conclusions: The authors' outcomes are comparable to the literature, and demonstrate that these procedures can safely be performed in an outpatient setting. The authors' grading scale classifies patients and helps the surgeon select a surgical technique. The authors show a statistical difference in rates of aesthetic revisions in Fischer grade 2B patients when a circumareolar incision is selected over a free nipple graft technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

AB - Background: The authors present their grading scale and the outcomes of the largest cohort of top surgery published to date. Application of this grading system can help determine which patients will benefit from a subcutaneous mastectomy with free nipple graft versus a circumareolar technique, with the primary endpoint being need for aesthetic revisions. Methods: The authors reviewed their database of transgender males who underwent bilateral mastectomy between 2006 and 2015. Data collected included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, smoking, diabetes, testosterone use, months of social transition, technique used, postoperative complications, and need for revision. Two techniques were used, circumareolar incision and free nipple graft technique. Results: Between 2006 and 2015, 1686 consecutive mastectomies were performed on 843 patients. Of those, 548 patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Of the 295 included, 109 were treated using a circumareolar incision and 186 were treated using a free nipple graft technique. There was no statistically significant difference in complications between the two groups; however, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of aesthetic revisions in the grade 2B circumareolar incision group (34 percent versus 8.8 percent). Conclusions: The authors' outcomes are comparable to the literature, and demonstrate that these procedures can safely be performed in an outpatient setting. The authors' grading scale classifies patients and helps the surgeon select a surgical technique. The authors show a statistical difference in rates of aesthetic revisions in Fischer grade 2B patients when a circumareolar incision is selected over a free nipple graft technique. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016332755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016332755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003225

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003225

M3 - Article

C2 - 28350658

AN - SCOPUS:85016332755

VL - 139

SP - 873e-882e

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 4

ER -