To trach or not to trach, that is the question

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Progressive neuromuscular disease requires increasing degrees of respiratory support to sustain life. Each step from intermittent to continuous—and noninvasive to invasive—ventilation requires thoughtful consideration based on the goals of the patient and family, and the inherent benefits and burdens of the treatment. Tracheostomy, in particular, should not be viewed as an inevitable next step when less permanent or invasive methods prove insufficient. Like other modes of respiratory support, tracheostomy may represent a bridge to recovery of pulmonary function, or a stabilizing action in the hope that novel therapies may prove beneficial. In other situations, tracheostomy represents a destination therapy, necessitating consideration of the implications of chronic mechanical ventilation. Institutional, social, and financial considerations may affect decisions related to tracheostomy, as may implicit bias regarding quality of life. The complexity of such care and decisions highlight the need for optimal palliative care throughout the patient's life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPaediatric Respiratory Reviews
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Tracheostomy
Neuromuscular Diseases
Recovery of Function
Palliative Care
Artificial Respiration
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Lung

Keywords

  • Best interests
  • Bias
  • Bridge
  • Destination
  • Disability paradox
  • Endotracheal tube
  • Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)
  • Palliative care
  • Tracheostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

To trach or not to trach, that is the question. / Macauley, Robert.

In: Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7b73ef6035f9430da82f93295b2a47d4,
title = "To trach or not to trach, that is the question",
abstract = "Progressive neuromuscular disease requires increasing degrees of respiratory support to sustain life. Each step from intermittent to continuous—and noninvasive to invasive—ventilation requires thoughtful consideration based on the goals of the patient and family, and the inherent benefits and burdens of the treatment. Tracheostomy, in particular, should not be viewed as an inevitable next step when less permanent or invasive methods prove insufficient. Like other modes of respiratory support, tracheostomy may represent a bridge to recovery of pulmonary function, or a stabilizing action in the hope that novel therapies may prove beneficial. In other situations, tracheostomy represents a destination therapy, necessitating consideration of the implications of chronic mechanical ventilation. Institutional, social, and financial considerations may affect decisions related to tracheostomy, as may implicit bias regarding quality of life. The complexity of such care and decisions highlight the need for optimal palliative care throughout the patient's life.",
keywords = "Best interests, Bias, Bridge, Destination, Disability paradox, Endotracheal tube, Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), Palliative care, Tracheostomy",
author = "Robert Macauley",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prrv.2018.05.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Paediatric Respiratory Reviews",
issn = "1526-0542",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - To trach or not to trach, that is the question

AU - Macauley, Robert

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Progressive neuromuscular disease requires increasing degrees of respiratory support to sustain life. Each step from intermittent to continuous—and noninvasive to invasive—ventilation requires thoughtful consideration based on the goals of the patient and family, and the inherent benefits and burdens of the treatment. Tracheostomy, in particular, should not be viewed as an inevitable next step when less permanent or invasive methods prove insufficient. Like other modes of respiratory support, tracheostomy may represent a bridge to recovery of pulmonary function, or a stabilizing action in the hope that novel therapies may prove beneficial. In other situations, tracheostomy represents a destination therapy, necessitating consideration of the implications of chronic mechanical ventilation. Institutional, social, and financial considerations may affect decisions related to tracheostomy, as may implicit bias regarding quality of life. The complexity of such care and decisions highlight the need for optimal palliative care throughout the patient's life.

AB - Progressive neuromuscular disease requires increasing degrees of respiratory support to sustain life. Each step from intermittent to continuous—and noninvasive to invasive—ventilation requires thoughtful consideration based on the goals of the patient and family, and the inherent benefits and burdens of the treatment. Tracheostomy, in particular, should not be viewed as an inevitable next step when less permanent or invasive methods prove insufficient. Like other modes of respiratory support, tracheostomy may represent a bridge to recovery of pulmonary function, or a stabilizing action in the hope that novel therapies may prove beneficial. In other situations, tracheostomy represents a destination therapy, necessitating consideration of the implications of chronic mechanical ventilation. Institutional, social, and financial considerations may affect decisions related to tracheostomy, as may implicit bias regarding quality of life. The complexity of such care and decisions highlight the need for optimal palliative care throughout the patient's life.

KW - Best interests

KW - Bias

KW - Bridge

KW - Destination

KW - Disability paradox

KW - Endotracheal tube

KW - Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)

KW - Palliative care

KW - Tracheostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060102543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060102543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prrv.2018.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.prrv.2018.05.004

M3 - Article

JO - Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

JF - Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

SN - 1526-0542

ER -