Time to Align Coverage with Evidence for Treatment of Back Pain

Daniel C. Cherkin, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Harley Goldberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite improved knowledge about the benefits and harms of treatments for chronic back pain in the past several decades, there is a large and consequential mismatch between treatments found safe and effective and those routinely covered by health insurance. As a result, care for back pain has, if anything, deteriorated in recent decades—expenses are higher, harms are greater, and use of ineffective treatments is more common. Deficiencies in health care delivery processes and payment models are centrally involved in the failure to improve care for back pain. A key step for accelerating progress is changing insurance coverage policies to facilitate use of the safest and most helpful approaches while discouraging riskier and less effective treatments. Relatively simple changes in reimbursement policies may minimize harm and improve quality of life for many patients with chronic back and similar pain syndromes. Such changes might also reduce health care expenditures because the costs of treatments currently covered by insurance and their associated harms may well outweigh the costs of the relatively safe and effective treatments recommended by current guidelines but poorly covered by insurance. There is no justification for continuing the status quo—patients and clinicians deserve better.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Insurance
Chronic Pain
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics
Insurance Coverage
Health Insurance
Health Expenditures
Health Care Costs
Quality of Life
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • back pain
  • evidence-based medicine
  • health insurance
  • reimbursement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Time to Align Coverage with Evidence for Treatment of Back Pain. / Cherkin, Daniel C.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Goldberg, Harley.

In: Journal of general internal medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60b83be4d4524735a46981511860d8f4,
title = "Time to Align Coverage with Evidence for Treatment of Back Pain",
abstract = "Despite improved knowledge about the benefits and harms of treatments for chronic back pain in the past several decades, there is a large and consequential mismatch between treatments found safe and effective and those routinely covered by health insurance. As a result, care for back pain has, if anything, deteriorated in recent decades—expenses are higher, harms are greater, and use of ineffective treatments is more common. Deficiencies in health care delivery processes and payment models are centrally involved in the failure to improve care for back pain. A key step for accelerating progress is changing insurance coverage policies to facilitate use of the safest and most helpful approaches while discouraging riskier and less effective treatments. Relatively simple changes in reimbursement policies may minimize harm and improve quality of life for many patients with chronic back and similar pain syndromes. Such changes might also reduce health care expenditures because the costs of treatments currently covered by insurance and their associated harms may well outweigh the costs of the relatively safe and effective treatments recommended by current guidelines but poorly covered by insurance. There is no justification for continuing the status quo—patients and clinicians deserve better.",
keywords = "back pain, evidence-based medicine, health insurance, reimbursement",
author = "Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Harley Goldberg",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-019-05099-z",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to Align Coverage with Evidence for Treatment of Back Pain

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Goldberg, Harley

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Despite improved knowledge about the benefits and harms of treatments for chronic back pain in the past several decades, there is a large and consequential mismatch between treatments found safe and effective and those routinely covered by health insurance. As a result, care for back pain has, if anything, deteriorated in recent decades—expenses are higher, harms are greater, and use of ineffective treatments is more common. Deficiencies in health care delivery processes and payment models are centrally involved in the failure to improve care for back pain. A key step for accelerating progress is changing insurance coverage policies to facilitate use of the safest and most helpful approaches while discouraging riskier and less effective treatments. Relatively simple changes in reimbursement policies may minimize harm and improve quality of life for many patients with chronic back and similar pain syndromes. Such changes might also reduce health care expenditures because the costs of treatments currently covered by insurance and their associated harms may well outweigh the costs of the relatively safe and effective treatments recommended by current guidelines but poorly covered by insurance. There is no justification for continuing the status quo—patients and clinicians deserve better.

AB - Despite improved knowledge about the benefits and harms of treatments for chronic back pain in the past several decades, there is a large and consequential mismatch between treatments found safe and effective and those routinely covered by health insurance. As a result, care for back pain has, if anything, deteriorated in recent decades—expenses are higher, harms are greater, and use of ineffective treatments is more common. Deficiencies in health care delivery processes and payment models are centrally involved in the failure to improve care for back pain. A key step for accelerating progress is changing insurance coverage policies to facilitate use of the safest and most helpful approaches while discouraging riskier and less effective treatments. Relatively simple changes in reimbursement policies may minimize harm and improve quality of life for many patients with chronic back and similar pain syndromes. Such changes might also reduce health care expenditures because the costs of treatments currently covered by insurance and their associated harms may well outweigh the costs of the relatively safe and effective treatments recommended by current guidelines but poorly covered by insurance. There is no justification for continuing the status quo—patients and clinicians deserve better.

KW - back pain

KW - evidence-based medicine

KW - health insurance

KW - reimbursement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068348232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068348232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-019-05099-z

DO - 10.1007/s11606-019-05099-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 31243710

AN - SCOPUS:85068348232

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

ER -