Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality

Aaron Caughey, Adam C. Urato, Kathryn A. Lee, Mari Paule Thiet, A. Eugene Washington, Russell K. Laros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the association between time of delivery and neonatal outcomes in term deliveries. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all term pregnancies delivered at an academic institution with 24-hour in-house obstetric and anesthesia coverage. Time of delivery was categorized as day (7 am to 6 pm), evening (6 pm to 12 midnight), and late night (12 midnight to 7 am). Outcomes included 5-minute Apgar less than 7, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, base excess less than -12, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal death. We excluded patients delivered via cesarean delivery not in labor. We had greater than 80% power to detect a 25% difference in Apgar score, base excess, and admission to the NICU and 80% power to detect a 50% difference in umbilical artery pH less than 7.0. Results: Among the 34,424 deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 15,664 were during the day, 8495 were during the evening, and 10,265 were during the night. In univariate comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. For example, the rate of pH less than 7.0 was 0.7% during the day, 1.0% in the evening, and 0.6% at night (P = .12). Admissions to the NICU were 3.6% during the day, 3.7% in the evening, and 3.5% at night (P = .81). When we controlled for obstetric history, demographic factors, and labor characteristics, there were still no differences in rates of either neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of delivery. Conclusion: At our institution, we could not demonstrate any significant differences in neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of day among neonates delivered at term. These data can be used to counsel patients and families concerned about differences in time of delivery and potential impact on their infant's health. Future research should include time of delivery in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in various types of inpatient settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume199
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infant Mortality
Morbidity
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Umbilical Arteries
Obstetrical Anesthesia
Apgar Score
Mortality
Obstetrics
Inpatients
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
History
Mothers
Demography
Newborn Infant
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • neonatal mortality
  • perinatal morbidity
  • time of delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality. / Caughey, Aaron; Urato, Adam C.; Lee, Kathryn A.; Thiet, Mari Paule; Washington, A. Eugene; Laros, Russell K.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 199, No. 5, 11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Caughey, Aaron ; Urato, Adam C. ; Lee, Kathryn A. ; Thiet, Mari Paule ; Washington, A. Eugene ; Laros, Russell K. / Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008 ; Vol. 199, No. 5.
@article{5a42e80c6fb74645859892934cbd3f59,
title = "Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the association between time of delivery and neonatal outcomes in term deliveries. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all term pregnancies delivered at an academic institution with 24-hour in-house obstetric and anesthesia coverage. Time of delivery was categorized as day (7 am to 6 pm), evening (6 pm to 12 midnight), and late night (12 midnight to 7 am). Outcomes included 5-minute Apgar less than 7, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, base excess less than -12, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal death. We excluded patients delivered via cesarean delivery not in labor. We had greater than 80{\%} power to detect a 25{\%} difference in Apgar score, base excess, and admission to the NICU and 80{\%} power to detect a 50{\%} difference in umbilical artery pH less than 7.0. Results: Among the 34,424 deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 15,664 were during the day, 8495 were during the evening, and 10,265 were during the night. In univariate comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. For example, the rate of pH less than 7.0 was 0.7{\%} during the day, 1.0{\%} in the evening, and 0.6{\%} at night (P = .12). Admissions to the NICU were 3.6{\%} during the day, 3.7{\%} in the evening, and 3.5{\%} at night (P = .81). When we controlled for obstetric history, demographic factors, and labor characteristics, there were still no differences in rates of either neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of delivery. Conclusion: At our institution, we could not demonstrate any significant differences in neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of day among neonates delivered at term. These data can be used to counsel patients and families concerned about differences in time of delivery and potential impact on their infant's health. Future research should include time of delivery in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in various types of inpatient settings.",
keywords = "neonatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, time of delivery",
author = "Aaron Caughey and Urato, {Adam C.} and Lee, {Kathryn A.} and Thiet, {Mari Paule} and Washington, {A. Eugene} and Laros, {Russell K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.046",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time of delivery and neonatal morbidity and mortality

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Urato, Adam C.

AU - Lee, Kathryn A.

AU - Thiet, Mari Paule

AU - Washington, A. Eugene

AU - Laros, Russell K.

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the association between time of delivery and neonatal outcomes in term deliveries. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all term pregnancies delivered at an academic institution with 24-hour in-house obstetric and anesthesia coverage. Time of delivery was categorized as day (7 am to 6 pm), evening (6 pm to 12 midnight), and late night (12 midnight to 7 am). Outcomes included 5-minute Apgar less than 7, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, base excess less than -12, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal death. We excluded patients delivered via cesarean delivery not in labor. We had greater than 80% power to detect a 25% difference in Apgar score, base excess, and admission to the NICU and 80% power to detect a 50% difference in umbilical artery pH less than 7.0. Results: Among the 34,424 deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 15,664 were during the day, 8495 were during the evening, and 10,265 were during the night. In univariate comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. For example, the rate of pH less than 7.0 was 0.7% during the day, 1.0% in the evening, and 0.6% at night (P = .12). Admissions to the NICU were 3.6% during the day, 3.7% in the evening, and 3.5% at night (P = .81). When we controlled for obstetric history, demographic factors, and labor characteristics, there were still no differences in rates of either neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of delivery. Conclusion: At our institution, we could not demonstrate any significant differences in neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of day among neonates delivered at term. These data can be used to counsel patients and families concerned about differences in time of delivery and potential impact on their infant's health. Future research should include time of delivery in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in various types of inpatient settings.

AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to examine the association between time of delivery and neonatal outcomes in term deliveries. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all term pregnancies delivered at an academic institution with 24-hour in-house obstetric and anesthesia coverage. Time of delivery was categorized as day (7 am to 6 pm), evening (6 pm to 12 midnight), and late night (12 midnight to 7 am). Outcomes included 5-minute Apgar less than 7, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, base excess less than -12, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal death. We excluded patients delivered via cesarean delivery not in labor. We had greater than 80% power to detect a 25% difference in Apgar score, base excess, and admission to the NICU and 80% power to detect a 50% difference in umbilical artery pH less than 7.0. Results: Among the 34,424 deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 15,664 were during the day, 8495 were during the evening, and 10,265 were during the night. In univariate comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. For example, the rate of pH less than 7.0 was 0.7% during the day, 1.0% in the evening, and 0.6% at night (P = .12). Admissions to the NICU were 3.6% during the day, 3.7% in the evening, and 3.5% at night (P = .81). When we controlled for obstetric history, demographic factors, and labor characteristics, there were still no differences in rates of either neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of delivery. Conclusion: At our institution, we could not demonstrate any significant differences in neonatal morbidity or mortality by time of day among neonates delivered at term. These data can be used to counsel patients and families concerned about differences in time of delivery and potential impact on their infant's health. Future research should include time of delivery in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes in various types of inpatient settings.

KW - neonatal mortality

KW - perinatal morbidity

KW - time of delivery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54849425150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54849425150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.046

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 18501323

AN - SCOPUS:54849425150

VL - 199

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -