Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis: Comments on a meta-analysis

Sean Kohles, David A. Kohles, Adam P. Karp, Victor M. Erlich, Nayak L. Polissar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. In this Journal Club review, we critically examine the methodology and results of a recently published meta-analysis describing the time dependency of surgical outcomes associated with cauda equina syndrome (CES) diagnosis. Objectives. Our objectives are to clarify the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use of statistics regarding the findings of the previous publication. Summary of Background Data. Surgical outcomes from published reports are related to both preoperative conditions and the time between surgery and diagnosis of CES. Methods. We reexamined many of the papers that were used to create the surgical outcomes data set, including the publications that supplied quantitative information for logistic regression. Of special focus were studies that contributed to the "less than 24 hours from diagnosis" data. The use of statistical parameters such as probabilities and odds ratios to infer possible future outcomes is also addressed to clarify the papers' interpretations. To support the overall limitations of their generalized findings, we conducted a power analysis, which highlights the lack of statistical strength in the resulting conclusions. Results. The results of the initial work state that an advantage exists in treating patients within 48 hours in comparison to treating them during a period greater than 48 hours after the onset of CES symptoms. However, the authors also state that no difference exists between the effects of an early surgery (less than 24 hours) compared with a subsequent period between 24 and 48 hours after CES onset. Key elements of logistic regression and meta-analysis are used to refute specific aspects of their methodology as well as their clinical interpretation regarding acute intervention. Conclusions. We conclude that a flawed methodology and misinterpretation of results are reported, understating the value of early surgical intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1281-1287
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2004

Fingerprint

Polyradiculopathy
Meta-Analysis
Logistic Models
Publications
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Logistic regression
  • Meta-analysis
  • Statistical strength
  • Time dependence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Kohles, S., Kohles, D. A., Karp, A. P., Erlich, V. M., & Polissar, N. L. (2004). Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis: Comments on a meta-analysis. Spine, 29(11), 1281-1287. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200406010-00019

Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis : Comments on a meta-analysis. / Kohles, Sean; Kohles, David A.; Karp, Adam P.; Erlich, Victor M.; Polissar, Nayak L.

In: Spine, Vol. 29, No. 11, 01.06.2004, p. 1281-1287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kohles, Sean ; Kohles, David A. ; Karp, Adam P. ; Erlich, Victor M. ; Polissar, Nayak L. / Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis : Comments on a meta-analysis. In: Spine. 2004 ; Vol. 29, No. 11. pp. 1281-1287.
@article{a2763d82fd5842039739be61a341e98c,
title = "Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis: Comments on a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Study Design. In this Journal Club review, we critically examine the methodology and results of a recently published meta-analysis describing the time dependency of surgical outcomes associated with cauda equina syndrome (CES) diagnosis. Objectives. Our objectives are to clarify the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use of statistics regarding the findings of the previous publication. Summary of Background Data. Surgical outcomes from published reports are related to both preoperative conditions and the time between surgery and diagnosis of CES. Methods. We reexamined many of the papers that were used to create the surgical outcomes data set, including the publications that supplied quantitative information for logistic regression. Of special focus were studies that contributed to the {"}less than 24 hours from diagnosis{"} data. The use of statistical parameters such as probabilities and odds ratios to infer possible future outcomes is also addressed to clarify the papers' interpretations. To support the overall limitations of their generalized findings, we conducted a power analysis, which highlights the lack of statistical strength in the resulting conclusions. Results. The results of the initial work state that an advantage exists in treating patients within 48 hours in comparison to treating them during a period greater than 48 hours after the onset of CES symptoms. However, the authors also state that no difference exists between the effects of an early surgery (less than 24 hours) compared with a subsequent period between 24 and 48 hours after CES onset. Key elements of logistic regression and meta-analysis are used to refute specific aspects of their methodology as well as their clinical interpretation regarding acute intervention. Conclusions. We conclude that a flawed methodology and misinterpretation of results are reported, understating the value of early surgical intervention.",
keywords = "Cauda equina syndrome, Logistic regression, Meta-analysis, Statistical strength, Time dependence",
author = "Sean Kohles and Kohles, {David A.} and Karp, {Adam P.} and Erlich, {Victor M.} and Polissar, {Nayak L.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-200406010-00019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1281--1287",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-dependent surgical outcomes following cauda equina syndrome diagnosis

T2 - Comments on a meta-analysis

AU - Kohles, Sean

AU - Kohles, David A.

AU - Karp, Adam P.

AU - Erlich, Victor M.

AU - Polissar, Nayak L.

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - Study Design. In this Journal Club review, we critically examine the methodology and results of a recently published meta-analysis describing the time dependency of surgical outcomes associated with cauda equina syndrome (CES) diagnosis. Objectives. Our objectives are to clarify the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use of statistics regarding the findings of the previous publication. Summary of Background Data. Surgical outcomes from published reports are related to both preoperative conditions and the time between surgery and diagnosis of CES. Methods. We reexamined many of the papers that were used to create the surgical outcomes data set, including the publications that supplied quantitative information for logistic regression. Of special focus were studies that contributed to the "less than 24 hours from diagnosis" data. The use of statistical parameters such as probabilities and odds ratios to infer possible future outcomes is also addressed to clarify the papers' interpretations. To support the overall limitations of their generalized findings, we conducted a power analysis, which highlights the lack of statistical strength in the resulting conclusions. Results. The results of the initial work state that an advantage exists in treating patients within 48 hours in comparison to treating them during a period greater than 48 hours after the onset of CES symptoms. However, the authors also state that no difference exists between the effects of an early surgery (less than 24 hours) compared with a subsequent period between 24 and 48 hours after CES onset. Key elements of logistic regression and meta-analysis are used to refute specific aspects of their methodology as well as their clinical interpretation regarding acute intervention. Conclusions. We conclude that a flawed methodology and misinterpretation of results are reported, understating the value of early surgical intervention.

AB - Study Design. In this Journal Club review, we critically examine the methodology and results of a recently published meta-analysis describing the time dependency of surgical outcomes associated with cauda equina syndrome (CES) diagnosis. Objectives. Our objectives are to clarify the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use of statistics regarding the findings of the previous publication. Summary of Background Data. Surgical outcomes from published reports are related to both preoperative conditions and the time between surgery and diagnosis of CES. Methods. We reexamined many of the papers that were used to create the surgical outcomes data set, including the publications that supplied quantitative information for logistic regression. Of special focus were studies that contributed to the "less than 24 hours from diagnosis" data. The use of statistical parameters such as probabilities and odds ratios to infer possible future outcomes is also addressed to clarify the papers' interpretations. To support the overall limitations of their generalized findings, we conducted a power analysis, which highlights the lack of statistical strength in the resulting conclusions. Results. The results of the initial work state that an advantage exists in treating patients within 48 hours in comparison to treating them during a period greater than 48 hours after the onset of CES symptoms. However, the authors also state that no difference exists between the effects of an early surgery (less than 24 hours) compared with a subsequent period between 24 and 48 hours after CES onset. Key elements of logistic regression and meta-analysis are used to refute specific aspects of their methodology as well as their clinical interpretation regarding acute intervention. Conclusions. We conclude that a flawed methodology and misinterpretation of results are reported, understating the value of early surgical intervention.

KW - Cauda equina syndrome

KW - Logistic regression

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Statistical strength

KW - Time dependence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542504382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542504382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00019

DO - 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00019

M3 - Article

C2 - 15167669

AN - SCOPUS:2542504382

VL - 29

SP - 1281

EP - 1287

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 11

ER -