Therapeutic trials for low back pain

Richard M. Hoffman, Judith A. Turner, Daniel C. Cherkin, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Larry D. Herron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Little consensus exists regarding the indications for and effectiveness of many back pain treatments. This clinical uncertainty arises because most back pain research has been flawed by poor methodology. The authors discuss strategies for improving the quality of back pain research on treatrrent efficacy, Design features, including randomized treatment allocation, independent outcome assessors, comprehensive outcome measures, appropriate statistical analyses, and close patient follow-up can Increase study validity. Complete descriptions of enrollment criteria, patient characteristics, and clinical interventions can increase the generalizability of results. Although large scale trials often involve university centers, community-based researchers can collaborate on randomized trials or conduct valuable cohort studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2068-2075
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume19
Issue number18
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Back Pain
Low Back Pain
Research
Uncertainty
Cohort Studies
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Health status measures
  • Low back pain
  • Randomized trials
  • Spine surgery
  • Study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Hoffman, R. M., Turner, J. A., Cherkin, D. C., Deyo, R. R., & Herron, L. D. (1994). Therapeutic trials for low back pain. Spine, 19(18), 2068-2075.

Therapeutic trials for low back pain. / Hoffman, Richard M.; Turner, Judith A.; Cherkin, Daniel C.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Herron, Larry D.

In: Spine, Vol. 19, No. 18, 1994, p. 2068-2075.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoffman, RM, Turner, JA, Cherkin, DC, Deyo, RR & Herron, LD 1994, 'Therapeutic trials for low back pain', Spine, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 2068-2075.
Hoffman RM, Turner JA, Cherkin DC, Deyo RR, Herron LD. Therapeutic trials for low back pain. Spine. 1994;19(18):2068-2075.
Hoffman, Richard M. ; Turner, Judith A. ; Cherkin, Daniel C. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Herron, Larry D. / Therapeutic trials for low back pain. In: Spine. 1994 ; Vol. 19, No. 18. pp. 2068-2075.
@article{4a48e55b70514a21a7dc9d6116d18253,
title = "Therapeutic trials for low back pain",
abstract = "Little consensus exists regarding the indications for and effectiveness of many back pain treatments. This clinical uncertainty arises because most back pain research has been flawed by poor methodology. The authors discuss strategies for improving the quality of back pain research on treatrrent efficacy, Design features, including randomized treatment allocation, independent outcome assessors, comprehensive outcome measures, appropriate statistical analyses, and close patient follow-up can Increase study validity. Complete descriptions of enrollment criteria, patient characteristics, and clinical interventions can increase the generalizability of results. Although large scale trials often involve university centers, community-based researchers can collaborate on randomized trials or conduct valuable cohort studies.",
keywords = "Health status measures, Low back pain, Randomized trials, Spine surgery, Study design",
author = "Hoffman, {Richard M.} and Turner, {Judith A.} and Cherkin, {Daniel C.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Herron, {Larry D.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "2068--2075",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "18",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Therapeutic trials for low back pain

AU - Hoffman, Richard M.

AU - Turner, Judith A.

AU - Cherkin, Daniel C.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Herron, Larry D.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Little consensus exists regarding the indications for and effectiveness of many back pain treatments. This clinical uncertainty arises because most back pain research has been flawed by poor methodology. The authors discuss strategies for improving the quality of back pain research on treatrrent efficacy, Design features, including randomized treatment allocation, independent outcome assessors, comprehensive outcome measures, appropriate statistical analyses, and close patient follow-up can Increase study validity. Complete descriptions of enrollment criteria, patient characteristics, and clinical interventions can increase the generalizability of results. Although large scale trials often involve university centers, community-based researchers can collaborate on randomized trials or conduct valuable cohort studies.

AB - Little consensus exists regarding the indications for and effectiveness of many back pain treatments. This clinical uncertainty arises because most back pain research has been flawed by poor methodology. The authors discuss strategies for improving the quality of back pain research on treatrrent efficacy, Design features, including randomized treatment allocation, independent outcome assessors, comprehensive outcome measures, appropriate statistical analyses, and close patient follow-up can Increase study validity. Complete descriptions of enrollment criteria, patient characteristics, and clinical interventions can increase the generalizability of results. Although large scale trials often involve university centers, community-based researchers can collaborate on randomized trials or conduct valuable cohort studies.

KW - Health status measures

KW - Low back pain

KW - Randomized trials

KW - Spine surgery

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028109405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028109405&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 2068

EP - 2075

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 18

ER -