The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys: Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability

John E. Crews, Donald Lollar, Alex R. Kemper, Lisa M. Lee, Cynthia Owsley, Xinzhi Zhang, Amanda F. Elliott, Chiu Fang Chou, Jinan B. Saaddine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To review U.S. national population-based surveys to evaluate comparability and conceptual clarity of vision measures. Design: Perspective. Methods: The vision questions in 12 surveys were mapped to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework under the domains of condition, impairment, activity limitation, participation, and environment. Surveys examined include the National Health Interview Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the Census, and the Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: Nearly 100 vision measures were identified in 12 surveys. These surveys provided no consistent measure of vision or vision impairment. Survey questions asked about differing characteristics of vision-related disease, function, and social roles. A question related to ability to read newspaper print was the most commonly asked question in surveys. Conclusions: Limited comparability of data and lack of conceptual clarity in the population-based surveys resulted in an inability to consistently characterize the population of people experiencing vision impairment. Consequently, vision surveillance was limited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume154
Issue number6 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Surveys and Questionnaires
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Population
Newspapers
Aptitude
Nutrition Surveys
Censuses
Health Surveys
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys : Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability. / Crews, John E.; Lollar, Donald; Kemper, Alex R.; Lee, Lisa M.; Owsley, Cynthia; Zhang, Xinzhi; Elliott, Amanda F.; Chou, Chiu Fang; Saaddine, Jinan B.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 154, No. 6 SUPPL., 12.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Crews, JE, Lollar, D, Kemper, AR, Lee, LM, Owsley, C, Zhang, X, Elliott, AF, Chou, CF & Saaddine, JB 2012, 'The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys: Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability', American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 154, no. 6 SUPPL.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.029
Crews, John E. ; Lollar, Donald ; Kemper, Alex R. ; Lee, Lisa M. ; Owsley, Cynthia ; Zhang, Xinzhi ; Elliott, Amanda F. ; Chou, Chiu Fang ; Saaddine, Jinan B. / The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys : Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 154, No. 6 SUPPL.
@article{3262ae7da9de4a1f9598031dd75a7e65,
title = "The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys: Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability",
abstract = "Purpose: To review U.S. national population-based surveys to evaluate comparability and conceptual clarity of vision measures. Design: Perspective. Methods: The vision questions in 12 surveys were mapped to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework under the domains of condition, impairment, activity limitation, participation, and environment. Surveys examined include the National Health Interview Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the Census, and the Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: Nearly 100 vision measures were identified in 12 surveys. These surveys provided no consistent measure of vision or vision impairment. Survey questions asked about differing characteristics of vision-related disease, function, and social roles. A question related to ability to read newspaper print was the most commonly asked question in surveys. Conclusions: Limited comparability of data and lack of conceptual clarity in the population-based surveys resulted in an inability to consistently characterize the population of people experiencing vision impairment. Consequently, vision surveillance was limited.",
author = "Crews, {John E.} and Donald Lollar and Kemper, {Alex R.} and Lee, {Lisa M.} and Cynthia Owsley and Xinzhi Zhang and Elliott, {Amanda F.} and Chou, {Chiu Fang} and Saaddine, {Jinan B.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "154",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The variability of vision loss assessment in federally sponsored surveys

T2 - Seeking conceptual clarity and comparability

AU - Crews, John E.

AU - Lollar, Donald

AU - Kemper, Alex R.

AU - Lee, Lisa M.

AU - Owsley, Cynthia

AU - Zhang, Xinzhi

AU - Elliott, Amanda F.

AU - Chou, Chiu Fang

AU - Saaddine, Jinan B.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Purpose: To review U.S. national population-based surveys to evaluate comparability and conceptual clarity of vision measures. Design: Perspective. Methods: The vision questions in 12 surveys were mapped to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework under the domains of condition, impairment, activity limitation, participation, and environment. Surveys examined include the National Health Interview Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the Census, and the Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: Nearly 100 vision measures were identified in 12 surveys. These surveys provided no consistent measure of vision or vision impairment. Survey questions asked about differing characteristics of vision-related disease, function, and social roles. A question related to ability to read newspaper print was the most commonly asked question in surveys. Conclusions: Limited comparability of data and lack of conceptual clarity in the population-based surveys resulted in an inability to consistently characterize the population of people experiencing vision impairment. Consequently, vision surveillance was limited.

AB - Purpose: To review U.S. national population-based surveys to evaluate comparability and conceptual clarity of vision measures. Design: Perspective. Methods: The vision questions in 12 surveys were mapped to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework under the domains of condition, impairment, activity limitation, participation, and environment. Surveys examined include the National Health Interview Survey, the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the Census, and the Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: Nearly 100 vision measures were identified in 12 surveys. These surveys provided no consistent measure of vision or vision impairment. Survey questions asked about differing characteristics of vision-related disease, function, and social roles. A question related to ability to read newspaper print was the most commonly asked question in surveys. Conclusions: Limited comparability of data and lack of conceptual clarity in the population-based surveys resulted in an inability to consistently characterize the population of people experiencing vision impairment. Consequently, vision surveillance was limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869028084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869028084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.029

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23158222

AN - SCOPUS:84869028084

VL - 154

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 6 SUPPL.

ER -