TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator
AU - Thomas, Jason A.
AU - Perez-Alday, Erick Andres
AU - Hamilton, Christopher
AU - Kabir, Muammar M.
AU - Park, Eugene A.
AU - Tereshchenko, Larisa G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This physician-initiated study was partially supported by Boston-Scientific Center for the Advancement of Research. This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health R01HL118277 (LGT).
Funding Information:
This physician-initiated study was partially supported by Boston-Scientific Center for the Advancement of Research. This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health R01HL118277 (LGT).
Funding Information:
This physician-initiated study was partially supported by Boston-Scientific Center for the Advancement of Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Introduction: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. Methods and results: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18–81 y), body mass index (19–53), QRS duration (66–150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37–77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S– and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3–40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. Conclusion: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.
AB - Introduction: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. Methods and results: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18–81 y), body mass index (19–53), QRS duration (66–150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37–77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S– and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3–40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. Conclusion: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.
KW - Electrocardiogram
KW - Eligibility
KW - Subcutaneous ICD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046882596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046882596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 29754992
AN - SCOPUS:85046882596
SN - 0010-4825
VL - 102
SP - 242
EP - 250
JO - Computers in Biology and Medicine
JF - Computers in Biology and Medicine
ER -