The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors

Michele N. Schaefer, Joseph Bloom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Heightened awareness and concern regarding the large number of mentally ill misdemeanants in jails has led to a search for alternatives to jail and to the development nationwide of jail diversion programs for offenders with mental illness. Two such mechanisms-diversion to civil commitment and the use of mental health courts-are briefly reviewed. In Oregon, however, a rather unique mechanism is used to defer mentally ill misdemeanants (in addition to felons) from the criminal justice system: the insanity defense, with subsequent placement of the individual under Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. Statistics regarding such use from 1978 to 2001 are provided. The authors compare and contrast this jail alternative with both mental health courts and diversion to civil commitment, and discuss questions related to the feasibility of larger-scale use of this mechanism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-84
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume33
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Insanity Defense
misdemeanor
Mentally Ill Persons
mental illness
Mental Health
mental health
commitment
Criminal Law
Psychiatry
jurisdiction
offender
justice
statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors. / Schaefer, Michele N.; Bloom, Joseph.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2005, p. 79-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98b4ceffc8264443846b87972fb850ac,
title = "The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors",
abstract = "Heightened awareness and concern regarding the large number of mentally ill misdemeanants in jails has led to a search for alternatives to jail and to the development nationwide of jail diversion programs for offenders with mental illness. Two such mechanisms-diversion to civil commitment and the use of mental health courts-are briefly reviewed. In Oregon, however, a rather unique mechanism is used to defer mentally ill misdemeanants (in addition to felons) from the criminal justice system: the insanity defense, with subsequent placement of the individual under Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. Statistics regarding such use from 1978 to 2001 are provided. The authors compare and contrast this jail alternative with both mental health courts and diversion to civil commitment, and discuss questions related to the feasibility of larger-scale use of this mechanism.",
author = "Schaefer, {Michele N.} and Joseph Bloom",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "79--84",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors

AU - Schaefer, Michele N.

AU - Bloom, Joseph

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Heightened awareness and concern regarding the large number of mentally ill misdemeanants in jails has led to a search for alternatives to jail and to the development nationwide of jail diversion programs for offenders with mental illness. Two such mechanisms-diversion to civil commitment and the use of mental health courts-are briefly reviewed. In Oregon, however, a rather unique mechanism is used to defer mentally ill misdemeanants (in addition to felons) from the criminal justice system: the insanity defense, with subsequent placement of the individual under Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. Statistics regarding such use from 1978 to 2001 are provided. The authors compare and contrast this jail alternative with both mental health courts and diversion to civil commitment, and discuss questions related to the feasibility of larger-scale use of this mechanism.

AB - Heightened awareness and concern regarding the large number of mentally ill misdemeanants in jails has led to a search for alternatives to jail and to the development nationwide of jail diversion programs for offenders with mental illness. Two such mechanisms-diversion to civil commitment and the use of mental health courts-are briefly reviewed. In Oregon, however, a rather unique mechanism is used to defer mentally ill misdemeanants (in addition to felons) from the criminal justice system: the insanity defense, with subsequent placement of the individual under Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. Statistics regarding such use from 1978 to 2001 are provided. The authors compare and contrast this jail alternative with both mental health courts and diversion to civil commitment, and discuss questions related to the feasibility of larger-scale use of this mechanism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15244361719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15244361719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15809243

AN - SCOPUS:15244361719

VL - 33

SP - 79

EP - 84

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 1

ER -