The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection

Orhan Agcaoglu, Shamil Aliyev, Jamie Mitchell, Kresimira Milas, Allan Siperstein, Eren Berber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Although the utility of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in thyroidectomy has been extensively demonstrated, there is little experience regarding its use for neck dissections. Methods. Within 10 years, 119 patients underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for thyroid cancer. In 51 patients, MRND was performed using conventional knot tying and in 68 using the HS. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), drain output, duration of the drainage, and complications were compared for 47 patients undergoing first-time unilateral MRND without concomitant additional surgical procedures. Results. The number of LNs removed, operative time, duration of drainage, and rate of lymphatic leak were similar between groups. For the HS group, EBL (5 ± 3 vs 32 ± 10; P =.006) and drain output on postoperative day 1 (51.7 ± 6.2 vs 78.9 ± 11.9; P =.02) and at 1 week (6.1 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 1.8, respectively; P =.03) were significantly less. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of its retrospective nature, this study shows that the HS reduces EBL and the amount of lymphatic drainage compared to knot tying after MRND.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-85
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Innovation
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Neck Dissection
Drainage
Operative Time
Lymph Nodes
Thyroidectomy
Thyroid Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • harmonic scalpel
  • neck dissection
  • thyroid cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Agcaoglu, O., Aliyev, S., Mitchell, J., Milas, K., Siperstein, A., & Berber, E. (2013). The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection. Surgical Innovation, 20(1), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350612444782

The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection. / Agcaoglu, Orhan; Aliyev, Shamil; Mitchell, Jamie; Milas, Kresimira; Siperstein, Allan; Berber, Eren.

In: Surgical Innovation, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 81-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agcaoglu, O, Aliyev, S, Mitchell, J, Milas, K, Siperstein, A & Berber, E 2013, 'The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection', Surgical Innovation, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350612444782
Agcaoglu, Orhan ; Aliyev, Shamil ; Mitchell, Jamie ; Milas, Kresimira ; Siperstein, Allan ; Berber, Eren. / The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection. In: Surgical Innovation. 2013 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 81-85.
@article{7345415a53684f43a6f9a00d6c16c2f1,
title = "The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection",
abstract = "Background. Although the utility of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in thyroidectomy has been extensively demonstrated, there is little experience regarding its use for neck dissections. Methods. Within 10 years, 119 patients underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for thyroid cancer. In 51 patients, MRND was performed using conventional knot tying and in 68 using the HS. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), drain output, duration of the drainage, and complications were compared for 47 patients undergoing first-time unilateral MRND without concomitant additional surgical procedures. Results. The number of LNs removed, operative time, duration of drainage, and rate of lymphatic leak were similar between groups. For the HS group, EBL (5 ± 3 vs 32 ± 10; P =.006) and drain output on postoperative day 1 (51.7 ± 6.2 vs 78.9 ± 11.9; P =.02) and at 1 week (6.1 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 1.8, respectively; P =.03) were significantly less. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of its retrospective nature, this study shows that the HS reduces EBL and the amount of lymphatic drainage compared to knot tying after MRND.",
keywords = "harmonic scalpel, neck dissection, thyroid cancer",
author = "Orhan Agcaoglu and Shamil Aliyev and Jamie Mitchell and Kresimira Milas and Allan Siperstein and Eren Berber",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1553350612444782",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "81--85",
journal = "Surgical Innovation",
issn = "1553-3506",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the harmonic scalpel versus knot tying for modified radical neck dissection

AU - Agcaoglu, Orhan

AU - Aliyev, Shamil

AU - Mitchell, Jamie

AU - Milas, Kresimira

AU - Siperstein, Allan

AU - Berber, Eren

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background. Although the utility of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in thyroidectomy has been extensively demonstrated, there is little experience regarding its use for neck dissections. Methods. Within 10 years, 119 patients underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for thyroid cancer. In 51 patients, MRND was performed using conventional knot tying and in 68 using the HS. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), drain output, duration of the drainage, and complications were compared for 47 patients undergoing first-time unilateral MRND without concomitant additional surgical procedures. Results. The number of LNs removed, operative time, duration of drainage, and rate of lymphatic leak were similar between groups. For the HS group, EBL (5 ± 3 vs 32 ± 10; P =.006) and drain output on postoperative day 1 (51.7 ± 6.2 vs 78.9 ± 11.9; P =.02) and at 1 week (6.1 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 1.8, respectively; P =.03) were significantly less. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of its retrospective nature, this study shows that the HS reduces EBL and the amount of lymphatic drainage compared to knot tying after MRND.

AB - Background. Although the utility of the harmonic scalpel (HS) in thyroidectomy has been extensively demonstrated, there is little experience regarding its use for neck dissections. Methods. Within 10 years, 119 patients underwent modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for thyroid cancer. In 51 patients, MRND was performed using conventional knot tying and in 68 using the HS. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), drain output, duration of the drainage, and complications were compared for 47 patients undergoing first-time unilateral MRND without concomitant additional surgical procedures. Results. The number of LNs removed, operative time, duration of drainage, and rate of lymphatic leak were similar between groups. For the HS group, EBL (5 ± 3 vs 32 ± 10; P =.006) and drain output on postoperative day 1 (51.7 ± 6.2 vs 78.9 ± 11.9; P =.02) and at 1 week (6.1 ± 1.2 vs 10.2 ± 1.8, respectively; P =.03) were significantly less. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of its retrospective nature, this study shows that the HS reduces EBL and the amount of lymphatic drainage compared to knot tying after MRND.

KW - harmonic scalpel

KW - neck dissection

KW - thyroid cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872305444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1553350612444782

DO - 10.1177/1553350612444782

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 81

EP - 85

JO - Surgical Innovation

JF - Surgical Innovation

SN - 1553-3506

IS - 1

ER -