The Use of Pulse Oximetry for Objective Quantification of Vascular Injuries in the Hand

Neil Tarabadkar, Matthew L. Iorio, Kenneth Gundle, Jeffrey B. Friedrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Efficient identification of dysvascular finger(s) following trauma is critical for triaging surgical care and optimizing patient outcomes. The authors designed a study evaluating an objective measure of digital hypoxia followed by surgical exploration and correlation with vascular injury. Methods: Patients with lacerating or penetrating trauma to the hand or digits were examined. A pulse oximeter was applied to the injured digit, and the oxygen saturation was recorded. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for differences in pulse oximetry for digits with and without an ischemic-type injury that required repair. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine cut-points. Results: Twenty patients with digital lacerations were enrolled, with a total of 49 digit measurements of pulse oximetry. Twelve dysvascular injuries requiring repair or amputation were confirmed in the operating room. There was a significant difference in pulse oximetry measurement in digits with (76 percent; 95 percent CI, 64 to 87 percent) and without (98 percent; 95 percent CI, 97 to 99 percent) ischemic injury (p < 0.001). Injured digits ranged in pulse oximetry values from 53 to 92 percent. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry is widely available and offers an objective measure of tissue oxygenation. No digit with a pulse oximetry value of at least 95 percent had an ischemic injury, and all digits with a pulse oximetry value of 84 percent or lower required operative vascular treatment. Based on these data, pulse oximetry should be adopted as a routine measure for the evaluation and communication of a potentially dysvascular digit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1227-1233
Number of pages7
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oximetry
Vascular System Injuries
Hand
Wounds and Injuries
Nonparametric Statistics
Lacerations
Operating Rooms
Amputation
ROC Curve
Fingers
Blood Vessels
Pulse
Patient Care
Communication
Oxygen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The Use of Pulse Oximetry for Objective Quantification of Vascular Injuries in the Hand. / Tarabadkar, Neil; Iorio, Matthew L.; Gundle, Kenneth; Friedrich, Jeffrey B.

In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery, Vol. 136, No. 6, 01.01.2015, p. 1227-1233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tarabadkar, Neil ; Iorio, Matthew L. ; Gundle, Kenneth ; Friedrich, Jeffrey B. / The Use of Pulse Oximetry for Objective Quantification of Vascular Injuries in the Hand. In: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 136, No. 6. pp. 1227-1233.
@article{f8c260e6e51247f695b7fbd9870a2dc6,
title = "The Use of Pulse Oximetry for Objective Quantification of Vascular Injuries in the Hand",
abstract = "Efficient identification of dysvascular finger(s) following trauma is critical for triaging surgical care and optimizing patient outcomes. The authors designed a study evaluating an objective measure of digital hypoxia followed by surgical exploration and correlation with vascular injury. Methods: Patients with lacerating or penetrating trauma to the hand or digits were examined. A pulse oximeter was applied to the injured digit, and the oxygen saturation was recorded. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for differences in pulse oximetry for digits with and without an ischemic-type injury that required repair. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine cut-points. Results: Twenty patients with digital lacerations were enrolled, with a total of 49 digit measurements of pulse oximetry. Twelve dysvascular injuries requiring repair or amputation were confirmed in the operating room. There was a significant difference in pulse oximetry measurement in digits with (76 percent; 95 percent CI, 64 to 87 percent) and without (98 percent; 95 percent CI, 97 to 99 percent) ischemic injury (p < 0.001). Injured digits ranged in pulse oximetry values from 53 to 92 percent. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry is widely available and offers an objective measure of tissue oxygenation. No digit with a pulse oximetry value of at least 95 percent had an ischemic injury, and all digits with a pulse oximetry value of 84 percent or lower required operative vascular treatment. Based on these data, pulse oximetry should be adopted as a routine measure for the evaluation and communication of a potentially dysvascular digit.",
author = "Neil Tarabadkar and Iorio, {Matthew L.} and Kenneth Gundle and Friedrich, {Jeffrey B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0000000000001777",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "1227--1233",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Use of Pulse Oximetry for Objective Quantification of Vascular Injuries in the Hand

AU - Tarabadkar, Neil

AU - Iorio, Matthew L.

AU - Gundle, Kenneth

AU - Friedrich, Jeffrey B.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Efficient identification of dysvascular finger(s) following trauma is critical for triaging surgical care and optimizing patient outcomes. The authors designed a study evaluating an objective measure of digital hypoxia followed by surgical exploration and correlation with vascular injury. Methods: Patients with lacerating or penetrating trauma to the hand or digits were examined. A pulse oximeter was applied to the injured digit, and the oxygen saturation was recorded. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for differences in pulse oximetry for digits with and without an ischemic-type injury that required repair. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine cut-points. Results: Twenty patients with digital lacerations were enrolled, with a total of 49 digit measurements of pulse oximetry. Twelve dysvascular injuries requiring repair or amputation were confirmed in the operating room. There was a significant difference in pulse oximetry measurement in digits with (76 percent; 95 percent CI, 64 to 87 percent) and without (98 percent; 95 percent CI, 97 to 99 percent) ischemic injury (p < 0.001). Injured digits ranged in pulse oximetry values from 53 to 92 percent. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry is widely available and offers an objective measure of tissue oxygenation. No digit with a pulse oximetry value of at least 95 percent had an ischemic injury, and all digits with a pulse oximetry value of 84 percent or lower required operative vascular treatment. Based on these data, pulse oximetry should be adopted as a routine measure for the evaluation and communication of a potentially dysvascular digit.

AB - Efficient identification of dysvascular finger(s) following trauma is critical for triaging surgical care and optimizing patient outcomes. The authors designed a study evaluating an objective measure of digital hypoxia followed by surgical exploration and correlation with vascular injury. Methods: Patients with lacerating or penetrating trauma to the hand or digits were examined. A pulse oximeter was applied to the injured digit, and the oxygen saturation was recorded. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for differences in pulse oximetry for digits with and without an ischemic-type injury that required repair. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to determine cut-points. Results: Twenty patients with digital lacerations were enrolled, with a total of 49 digit measurements of pulse oximetry. Twelve dysvascular injuries requiring repair or amputation were confirmed in the operating room. There was a significant difference in pulse oximetry measurement in digits with (76 percent; 95 percent CI, 64 to 87 percent) and without (98 percent; 95 percent CI, 97 to 99 percent) ischemic injury (p < 0.001). Injured digits ranged in pulse oximetry values from 53 to 92 percent. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry is widely available and offers an objective measure of tissue oxygenation. No digit with a pulse oximetry value of at least 95 percent had an ischemic injury, and all digits with a pulse oximetry value of 84 percent or lower required operative vascular treatment. Based on these data, pulse oximetry should be adopted as a routine measure for the evaluation and communication of a potentially dysvascular digit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947910643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947910643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001777

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001777

M3 - Article

C2 - 26267399

AN - SCOPUS:84947910643

VL - 136

SP - 1227

EP - 1233

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 6

ER -